Section One: CONDITIONS OF RISK

Alexander K. L. , Entwisle D. R. , Dauber S. L. , & Kabbani N. (2000, October). Dropout in relation to grade retention: An accounting from the Beginning School Study. Paper presented at The National Invitational Conference, Alexandria, VA.

Balfanz R. , & Legters N. (2001, January). How many central city high schools have a severe dropout problem, where are they located, and who attends them? Paper presented at a forum convened by The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University's Graduate School of Education and Achieve, Inc., Cambridge, MA.

Barr R. D. , & Parrett W. H. (2000). Hope fulfilled for at-risk and violent youth: K–12 programs that work (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Barth P. , Haycock K. , Jackson H. , Mora K. , Ruiz P. , Robinson S. , & Wilkins A. (Eds.). (1999). Dispelling the myth: High poverty schools exceeding expectations. Washington, DC: Education Trust.

Bennett N. G. , Li J. , Song Y. , & Yang K. (1999). Young children in poverty: A statistical update. New York: Columbia University, National Center for Children in Poverty.

Bourque M. I. , & Byrd S. (Eds.). (2000). Student performance standards on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Affirmations and improvements. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.

Boyd W. L. , & Shouse R. C. (1997). The problems and promise of urban schools. (LSS Publication Series No. 97–12). Philadelphia: Temple University Laboratory for Student Success.

Brewer D. J. , Rees D. I. , & Argys L. M. (1995). Detracking America's schools: The reform without cost? Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 210–215.

Campbell J. R. , Hombo C. M. , & Mazzeo J. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance (NCES 2000–469). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Carrasquillo A. L. (1999). Profile of Hispanic students in United States public schools. In Kemper E. A. (Managing Ed.) and A. Tashakkori & S. H. Ochoa (Volume Eds.), Readings on equal education: Vol. 16. Education of Hispanics in the United States (pp. 25–43). New York: AMS Press.

Cotton K. (1996). School size, school climate, and student performance (School Improvement Research Series). Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Cuban L. (1989). The “at-risk” label and the problem of urban school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 780–801.

Day C. J. , & Bauman K. J. (2000). Have we reached the top? Educational attainment projections of the U.S. population (Working paper series No. 43). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

Donahue P. L. , Voelkl K. E. , Campbell J. R. , & Mazzeo J. (1999). The NAEP 1998 reading report card for the nation and the states (NCES 1999–500). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Education Week (2001, February 27). Violence and safety [On-line: Education Week on the Web]. Available: http://www.edweek.org/context/topics/issuespage.cfm?id=39

Edwards V. A. (Ed.). (1998). Quality counts ‘98: The urban challenge: Public education in the 50 states [Special issue]. Education Week, 17(17).

Ellwood D. T. (1999). The plight of the working poor. Children's Roundtable Report, 2, 1–8.

Finn J. D. , & Achilles C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 97–109.

Fleischman H. L. , & Hopstock P. J. (1993). Descriptive study of services to limited English proficient students (Report to the U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary). Arlington, VA: Development Associates, Inc.

Fuchs D. , & Fuchs L. S. (1995). What's “special” about special education? Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 522–530.

Gleason P. , & Dynarski M. (in press). Do we know whom to serve? Issues in using risk factors to identify dropouts. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk.

Gordon R. , Piana L. D. , & Keleher T. (2000). Facing the consequences: An examination of racial discrimination in U.S. public schools. Oakland, CA: Applied Research Center.

Grissmer D. (1999). Conclusion: Class size effects: Assessing the evidence, its policy implications, and future research agenda. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 231–248.

Hallinan M. T. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67, 79–84.

Hanushek E. A. (1999). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 143–163.

Hardy L. (2000). The trouble with standards. American School Board Journal, 187(9), 22–26.

Haveman R. , & Schwabish J. (1999). Economic growth and poverty: A return to normalcy? Focus, 20(2), 1–7.

Jencks C. , & Mayer S. E. (1990). Social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In Lynn L. E. Jr. , & McGeary M. G. H. (Eds.), Inner city poverty in the US (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Jimerson S. R. (1999). On the failure of failure: Examining the association between early grade retention and education and employment outcomes during late adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 243–272.

Karweit N. L. (1999). Grade retention: Prevalence, timing, and effects (Report #33). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk.

Kaufman P. , Kwon J. Y. , Klein S. , & Chapman C. D. (2000). Dropout rates in the United States: 1999 (NCES 2001-022). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Kaufman P. , McMillen M. , & Sweet D. (1996). A comparison of high school dropout rates in 1982 and 1992 (NCES 96–893). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Kingery P. M. , Coggeshall M. B. , & Alford A. A. (1998). Violence at school: Recent evidence from four national surveys. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 247–258.

Lee V. E. , & Smith J. B. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 205–227.

Lippman L. , Burns S. , & McArthur E. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty (NCES 96–184). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Loveless T. (1998). The tracking and ability grouping debate. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.

Lucas S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

Lugaila T. A. (1998). Marital status and living arrangements: March 1998 (update) (Current Population Reports P20–514). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

Macías R. F. (1998a). How has the limited English proficient student population changed in recent years? Washington, DC: George Washington University, National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Macías R. F. (1998b). Summary report of the survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services, 1996–1997. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Madon S. , Jussim L. , & Eccles J. (1997). In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 791–809.

Mayer M. J. , & Leone P. E. (1999). A structural analysis of school violence and disruption: Implications for creating safer schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 333–56.

McLanahan S. , & Sandefur G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

McMillen M. (1997). Dropout rates in the United States (NCES 97–473). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

National Center for Children in Poverty (NCCP). (1999). High school diploma, working parents, little protection against young child poverty. News and Issues, 9(2), 3.

National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education [NCBE]. (2000). How many school-aged limited English proficient students are there in the US? How many in each state? Washington, DC: Author.

National Commission on the High School Senior Year. (2001). The lost opportunity of senior year: Finding a better way. Preliminary report. Washington, DC: Author.

Natriello G. , McDill E. L. , & Pallas A. M. (1990). Schooling disadvantaged children: Racing against catastrophe. New York: Teachers College Press.

Nord C. W. , Brimhall D. , & West J. (1997). Fathers’ involvement in their children's schools (NCES 98-091). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Nye B. , Hedges L. V. , & Konstantopoulos S. (1999). The long-term effects of small classes: A five-year follow-up of the Tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 127–142.

Oakes J. (1994). More than misapplied technology: A normative and political response to Hallinan on tracking. Sociology of Education, 67, 84–89.

Olson L. (2000a). Minority groups to emerge as a majority in U.S. schools. Education Week, 20(4), 34–35.

Olson L. (2000b). School-age “millenni-boom” predicted for next 100 years. Education Week, 20(4), 32–33.

Padilla A. M. , Lindholm K. J. , Chen A. , Duran R. , Hakuta K. , Lambert W. , & Tucker C. R. (1991). The English-only movement: Myths, reality, and implications for psychology. American Psychologist, 46, 120–130.

Pittman R. B. , & Haughwout P. (1987). Influence of high school size on dropout rate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 337–343.

Rees D. I. , Argys L. M. , & Brewer D. J. (1996). Tracking in the United States: Descriptive statistics from NELS. Economics of Education Review, 15, 83–89.

Reese C. M. , Miller K. E. , Mazzeo J. , & Dossey J. A. (1997). NAEP 1996 mathematics report card for the nation and the states (NCES 97–488). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Roderick M. (1995). Grade retention and school dropout: Policy debate and research questions. Phi Delta Kappa Research Bulletin, 15, 1–6.

Rosenthal R. , & Jacobson L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Sanders M. G. , & Jordan W. J. (2000). Student-teacher relations and academic achievement in high school. In Sanders M. G. (Ed.), Schooling students placed at risk (pp. 65–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Shouse R. C. (1996). Academic press and sense of community: Conflict, congruence, and implications for student achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 47–68.

Skiba R. , & Peterson R. (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools? Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 372–376, 381–382.

Slavin R. E. (1989). Students at risk of school failure: The problem and its dimensions. In Slavin R. E. , Karweit N. L. , & Madden N. A. (Eds.), Effective programs for students at risk (pp. 3–17). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Slavin R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471–499.

Slavin R. E. , & Madden N. A. (1989). What works for students at risk: A research synthesis. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 4–13.

Smith A. E. , Jussim L. , Eccles J. , VanNoy M. , Madon S. , & Palumbo P. (1998). Self-fulfilling prophecies, perceptual biases, and accuracy at the individual and group levels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 530–561.

Snyder T. (2000). Digest of education statistics, 1999 (NCES 2000-031). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Snyder T. , & Wirt J. (1998). The condition of education, 1998 (NCES 98-013). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Swadener E. B. (1990). Children and families “at risk”: Etiology, critique, and alternative paradigms. Educational Foundations, 4(4), 17–39.

Toppo G. (2001, March 2). Report says Blacks three times as likely to be special-ed students. The Associated Press [On-line]. Available: http://www.wire.ap.org

Townsend B. L. (2000). The disproportionate discipline of African American learners: Reducing school suspensions and expulsions. Exceptional Children, 66, 381–391.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1996). National household and families projections [On-line]. Available: http://www.census.gov/population/projections/nation/hh-fam/table1n.txt

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1999a). Living arrangements of children under 18 years old: 1960 to present [On-line]. Available: http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/ms-la/tabch–1.txt

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1999b). School enrollment—social and economic characteristics of students (update) (Current Population Reports, October 1998, P20–521). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). Historical poverty tables [On-line]. Available: http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/histpov/hstpov3.html

U.S. Department of Education. (1995). The Prospects Report highlights, 1995. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (1999a). The condition of education 1999 (NCES 1999-022). Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education (1999b). Twenty-first annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education (2000a, February). A 5-year report card on American education. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (2000b). The condition of education 2000 (NCES 2000-062). Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education (2000c). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1999). Public education: Title I services provided to students with limited English proficiency (GAO/HEHS-00–25). Washington, DC: Author.

Winzer M. A. , & Mazurek K. (1998). Special education in multicultural contexts. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Young B. A. , & Smith T. M. (1997). The social context of education: No. 10 (NCES 97–981). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Zehr M. A. (2000). Un día nueva for schools. Education Week, 20(10), 39–45.