AckermannB. (1980). Social justice in the liberal state.New Haven: Yale University Press.
2.
AstutoT. A., ClarkD. L., ReadA., McGreeK., & Pelton FernandezL. d. (1994). Roots of reform.Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
3.
BarthR. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BerneR., & StiefelL. (1983). Changes in school finance equity: A national perspective. Journal of Education Finance, 8, 419–435.
5.
BlumerH. (1969). Symbolic interaction.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 78–89.
6.
BrownD. J. (1998). Schools with heart: Voluntarism and public education.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7.
CallahanR. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
CampbellR. F., CunninghamV. L., NystrandR. O., & UsdanM. D. (1985). The organization and control of American schools.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
9.
CohenJ. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In BohmanJ., & RehgW. (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 67–92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
11.
ColemanJ. S., & HofferT. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities.New York: Basic Books.
12.
CoonsJ. E., & SugarmanS. D. (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13.
DanzbergerJ. (1992). School boards: A troubled institution. In The Twentieth Century Fund/Danforth Foundation, Facing the challenge: The report of The Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on School Governance (pp. 19–129). New York: The Fund.
14.
DanzbergerJ., KirstM., & UsdanM. (1992). Governing public schools: New times, new requirements.Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
15.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education.New York: Macmillan.
16.
DeweyJ. (1990). The school and society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
ElmoreR. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership.The Albert Shanker Institute, winter.
18.
GuthrieJ. W. (1997, October). The paradox of educational power: How modern reform proposals miss the point. Education Week, 17(7), 34.
19.
GuthrieJ. W., GarmsW. I., & PierceL. C. (1988). School finance and education policy: Enhancing educational efficiency, equality, and choice.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
GuthrieJ. W., & KirstM. W. (1988, March). Conditions of education in California, 1988. Policy Paper # 88–3–2. Berkeley, CA: Policy Analysis for California Education.
21.
HabermasJ. (1996). Three normative models of democracy. In BenhabibS. (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 21–30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
HewittJ. P. (1989). Dilemmas of the American self.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23.
HobbsN., DokeckiP. R., Hoover-DempseyK. V., MoroneyR. M., ShayneM. W., & WeeksK. H. (1984). Strengthening families.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
HouseE. R., & HoweK. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Institute for Educational Leadership. (1986). School boards: Strengthening grass roots leadership.Washington, DC: Author.
26.
KatzM. B. (1971, Summer). From voluntarism to bureaucracy in American education. Sociology of Education, 44(3), 297–332.
27.
LiebermanA., FalkB., & AlexanderL. (1995). A culture in the making: Leadership in learner-centered schools. In OakesJ., & QuartzK. H. (Eds.), Creating new educational communities: Ninety-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 108–129). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
28.
LeukerG. (1992). Roles and realities of the local school board member. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
29.
LevinB. (1987). The courts as educational policy-makers in the USA. In BoydW. L., & SmartD. (Eds.), Educational policy in Australia and America: Comparative perspectives (pp. 100–128). New York: The Falmer Press.
30.
LitwakE., & SzelenyiI. (1969). Primary group structures and their functions: Kin, neighbors and friends. American Sociological Review, 34, 465–81.
31.
LortieD. C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
McAdamsD. R. (2000). Fighting to save our urban schools… and winning! Lessons from Houston.New York: Teachers College Press.
33.
MarkM. M., HenryG. T., & JulnesG. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
MathewsD. (1996). Is there a public for public schools?Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation Press.
35.
MathewsD. (1997). The lack of a public for public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 740–43.
36.
MurphyJ. (2000). Governing America's schools: The shifting playing field. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 57–84.
37.
National Goals Panel. (1997). The national education goals report: Building a nation of learners, 1997.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38.
OakesJ. (1995). Normative, technical, and political dimensions of creating new educational communities. In OakesJ., & QuartzK. H. (Eds.), Creating new educational communities: Ninety-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 1–15). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
39.
OddenA., & MarshD. (1990). Local response to the 1980s state education reforms: New patterns of local and state interaction. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational reform movement of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases. (pp. 167–186). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
40.
RallisS. F. (1993, April). School boards and school restructuring: A contradiction in terms? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
41.
RallisS. F., and DeckL. L. (1998). Get out of the sunshine—For a while. Unpublished monograph for the Center for the Support of Professional Practice in Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
42.
RamsayJ. G. (2000, October 4). A culture of questions. Commentary. Education Week, 20(5), 52, 30.
43.
RosenthalA. (1998). The decline of representative democracy.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
44.
RussoJ. C. (1992). The legal status of school boards in the intergovernmental system. In FirstP. F., & WalbergH. J. (Eds.), School boards: Changing local control, pp. 3–20. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
45.
SarasonS. B. (1994). Parental involvement and the political principle: Why the existing governance structure of schools should be abolished.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
ScrivenM. (1972). Objectivity and subjectivity in educational research. In ThomasL. G. (Ed.), Philosophical redirection of educational research: The seventy-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 94–142). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
48.
ShiblesM. R., RallisS. F., & DeckL. L. (2001). A new political balance between the superintendent and board: Clarifying purpose and generating knowledge. In BrunnerC., & BjorkL. G. (Eds.), Advances in research and theories of school management and education policy: The new superintendency (Vol. 6). Oxford: Elsevier Press.
49.
SnauwaertD. T. (1993). Democracy, education, and governance: A developmental conception.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
50.
StarrattR. J. (1997). Administering meaning, administering community, administering excellence: The new fundamentals of educational administration.New York: Merrill.
51.
StrikeK. A. (1999, February). Can schools be communities? The tension between shared values and inclusion. In G. Furman-Brown (Ed.), School as community: Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 46–70.
52.
SwansonA. D., & KingR. A. (1997). School finance: Its economics and politics (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
53.
TonniesF. (1940). Fundamental concepts of sociology.New York: American Book Co.
54.
Twentieth Century Fund. (1992). Facing the challenge: The 20th Century Fund TaskForce on School Governance.New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press.
55.
TyackD. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
TyackD. B. (1993). School governance in the United States: Historical puzzles and anomalies. In HannawayJ., & CarnoyM. (Eds.), Decentralization and school improvement (pp. 1–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57.
WallerW. (1932). The sociology of teaching.New York: Wiley.
58.
Washington State House of Representatives. (November, 1990). Report on an evaluation of Seattle public schools.Seattle: Author.
WheatleyM. J. (1994). Leadership and the new science.San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
61.
WirtF. M., & KirstM. W. (1982). Schools in conflict.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
62.
ZerchykovR. (1984). School boards and the communities they represent: An inventory of the research.Boston: Research for Responsive Education. ED 251 920.