Annenberg Institute for School Reform. (1998). Reasons for hope, voices for change: A report of the Annenberg Institute on public engagement for public education.Providence, RI: Author.
2.
BailynB. (1960). Education in the forming of American society: Needs and opportunities for study.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
3.
BeckL., & FosterW. (1999). Administration and community: Considering challenges, exploring possibilities. In MurphyJ., and Seashore LouisK. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 337–358). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BjörkL. (1993). Effective schools—effective superintendents: The emerging instructional leadership role. Journal of School Leadership3(3), 246–259.
5.
BjörkL. (1996). The revisionists’ critique of the education reform reports. Journal of School Leadership, 7(1), 290–315.
6.
BjörkL. (2000). Personal characteristics. In GlassT., BjörkL., & BrunnerC. C.The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium (pp. 15–32). Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
7.
BjörkL., & LindleJ. C. (2001). Superintendents and interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(1), 76–91.
8.
BjörkL., LindleJ. C., & Van MeterE. (1999). A summing up. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(4), 657–663.
9.
BlountJ. (1998). Destined to rule the schools: Women and the superintendency, 1873–1995.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
10.
BlumbergA. (1985). The school superintendent: Living with conflict.New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
BoydW. (1974). The school superintendent: Educational statesman or political strategist?Administrator's Notebook, 22(2), 21–26.
12.
BrunnerC. C. (1998a). The legacy of disconnection between the public schools and their communities: Suggestions for policy. Educational Policy, 12(3), 244–266.
13.
BrunnerC. C. (1998b). The new superintendency supports innovation: Collaborative decision making. Contemporary Education, 69(2), 79–82.
14.
BrunnerC. C. (1999). Power, gender, and superintendent selection. In BrunnerC. C. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 63–78). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
15.
BrunnerC. C. (2000). Principals of power: Women superintendents and the riddle of the heart.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
16.
BrunnerC. C. (2001, April). Supporting social justice: Power and authentic participatory decision making in the superintendency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
17.
BrunnerC. C., & BjörkL. (Eds.). (2002). The new superintendency: Advances in research and theories of school management and educational policy.Oxford, London: Elsevier Press.
18.
ButtsR., & CreminL. (1953). A history of education in American culture.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19.
CallahanR. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
CallahanR. E. (1967). The superintendent of schools: An historical analysis. Final report, S–212. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education (HEW).
21.
CampbellR. F., CunninghamL. L., NystrandR. O., & UsdanM. D. (1985). The organization and control of American schools (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
22.
CarterG., & CunninghamW. (1997). The American school superintendent: Leading in the age of pressure.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
CreminL. A. (1951). American common school: An historical conception.New York: Columbia University Teachers College.
24.
CrowsonR. L. (1992). School-community relations under reform.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
25.
CubanL. (1976). Urban school chiefs under fire.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
CunninghamW., & SperryJ. (2001). The underpaid educator. American School Board Journal (April), 38–42.
27.
DaviesB. (1994). Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice.Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
28.
DeasyJ. (2000). Moving from oversight to insight: One community's journey with its superintendent. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(1), 13–15.
29.
EbyF. (1957). The development of modern education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
ElmoreR. (1999, September). Leadership of large-scale improvement in American education. Paper prepared for the Albert Shanker Institute.
31.
GillandT. M. (1935). The origins and development of the powers and duties of the city-school superintendent.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
GlassT. E. (1997). The superintendency: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. In ChapmanC. H. (Ed.), Becoming a superintendent: Challenges of school district leadership (pp. 19–39). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
GlassT., BjörkL., & BrunnerC. C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
35.
GriffithsD. E. (1966). The school superintendent.New York: The Discourse for Applied Research in Education, Inc.
36.
GroganM. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
37.
GroganM. (2000). Laying the groundwork for a reconception of the superintendency from feminist postmodern perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 117–142.
38.
HillesheimJ. W., & MerrillG. D. (1980). Theory and practice in the history of American education: A book of readings.Washington, DC: University Press of America.
HoustonP. (2001). Superintendents for the 21st century: It's not just a job, it's a calling. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(6), 428–433.
41.
IannacconeL. (1967). Politics in education.New York: The Center for Applied Research in Education, Inc.
42.
IannacconeL. (1982). Changing political patterns and governmental regulations. In EverhartR. (Ed.), The public school monopoly: A critical analysis of education and the state in American society (pp. 295–324). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
43.
JohnstonR. (2000, October 4). Boosters call Houston's chief ‘a good thing and we know it’. In Education Week on the Web [On-line]. Retrieved May 30, 2001 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=05paige.h20
44.
KaestleC. R. (1983). Pillars of the republic: Common schools and American society, 1780–1860.New York: Hill and Wang.
KimbroughR. B., & NunneryM. Y. (1988). Politics, power, polls and school elections.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
47.
LarsonC., & OvandoC. (2001). The color of bureaucracy: The politics of equity in multicultural school communities.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
48.
LeithwoodK. (Ed.). (1995). Effective school district leadership: Transforming politics into education.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
49.
LutzF., & IannacconeL. (1978). Public participation in local schools: The dissatisfaction theory of American democracy.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
50.
MalenB. (1995). The micropolitics of education. In ScribnerJ. D., & LaytonD. H. (Eds.), The study of educational politic: The 1994 commemorative yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (1969–1994) (pp. 147–167). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
McCartyD., & RamseyC. (1971). The school managers: Power and conflict in American public schools.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
53.
MurphyJ. (1990). Educational reform of the 1980s: A comprehensive analysis. In MurphyJ., Educational reform of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases (pp. 3–56). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
54.
MurphyJ. (1999). The quest for a center: Notes on the state of the profession of educational leadership.Columbia, MO: The University Council for Educational Administration.
55.
MurphyJ. (2000). Governing America's schools: The shifting playing field. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 85–124.
NortonM. S., WebbL. D., DlugoshL. L., & SyboutsW. (1996). The school superin-tendency: New responsibilities, new leadership.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
RileyR. (1994). Education and Goals 2000. Keynote address at the annual conference of the American Association of School Administrators, San Francisco.
63.
SergiovanniT. (1994). Building community in schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
SewallA. (1999). Central office and site-based management: An educative guide.Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
65.
StarrattR. (1994). Building an ethical school.London: Falmer Press.
66.
StarrattR. (1997). Administering meaning, administering community, administering excellence: The new fundamentals of educational administration.New York: Merrill.
67.
SirotnikK. (1991). Improving urban schools in the age of “restructuring.” Education and Urban Society, 23(3), 256–69.
68.
StricherzM. (2001, January 24). Top Oakland administrators to receive bonuses tied to test scores. In Education Week on the Web [On-line]. Retrieved May 30, 2001 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=19oakland.h20
69.
TyackD., & HansotE. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980.New York: Basic Books.
70.
TyackD., LoweR., & HansotE. (1984). Public schools in hard times: The Great Depression and recent years.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
UrbanW., & WagonerJ. (1996). American education: A history.New York: McGraw-Hill.
72.
VallanceE. (1973). Hiding the hidden curriculum: An interpretation of language of justification in nineteenth century educational reform. Curriculum Theory Network, 4(1), 5–21.
73.
WebbL. D., MontelloP. A., & NortonM. S. (1994). Human resources administration: Personnel issues and needs in education (2nd ed.). New York: Merrill.
74.
WirtF. M., & KirstM. W. (1972). Political and social foundations of education.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
75.
WirtF., & KirstM. (1997). The political dynamics of American education.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
76.
YoungH. S. (1976). In pursuit of a profession: A historical analysis of the concept of “professionalization” for the American public school superintendency, 1865–1973. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.