AshtonP. T., & WebbR. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement.New York: Longman.
2.
BacharachS. B., & ConleyS. C. (1989). Uncertainty and decision-making in teaching: Implications for managing line professionals. In SergiovanniT., and MooreJ. H. (Eds.), Schooling for tomorrow: Directing reform to issues that count (pp. 311–329). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
BacharachS. B., ConleyS., & SheddJ. (1986). Beyond career ladders: Structuring teacher career development systems. Teachers College Record, 87, 563–574.
4.
BarnardC. I. (1968). Functions of the executive.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BassB. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
7.
BauerS., & BogotchI. E. (2001). Analysis of the relationships among site council resources, council practices, and outcomes. Journal of School Leadership, 11, 98–119.
8.
BizarM., & BarrR. (2001). School leadership in times of urban reform.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching. (2000, May). Assessing results: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative—Year 4.Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Teaching, Stanford University.
10.
ChrispeelsJ. H. (1992). Purposeful restructuring: Creating a culture for learning and achievement in elementary schools.Washington, DC: Falmer.
11.
CliftR. T., VealM. L., HollandP., JohnsonM., & McCarthyJ. (1995). Collaborative leadership and shared decision making: Teachers, principals, and university professors.New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. L. (1998). Teacher research: The question that persists. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1, 19–36.
13.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. L. (1999a). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In Iran-NejadA., & PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 24 (pp. 249–305). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
14.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. L. (1999b). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.
15.
ConleyS. (1991). Review of research on teacher participation in school decision making. In GrantG. (Ed.), Review of research in education, 17 (pp. 225–266). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
16.
CoplandM. A. (2001, April). Shared school leadership: Moving from role to function in an inquiry-based model of school reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
17.
CrowG. M., & PounderD. G. (2000). Interdisciplinary teacher teams: Context, design, and process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 216–254.
18.
DeweyJ. (1903). Democracy in education. Elementary School Teacher, 4(4), 193–204.
19.
DonaldsonG. A. (2001). Cultivating leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, and practice.New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
DunlapD. M., & GoldmanP. (1991). Rethinking power in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27, 5–29.
21.
ElmoreR. F., PetersonP. L., & McCartheyS. J. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school organization.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
ErbT. O. (1987). What team organization can do for teachers. Middle School Journal, 18(4), 3–6.
23.
ErbT. O. (1995). Teamwork in middle school education. In GarnerH. G. (Ed.), Teamwork models and experience in education (pp. 175–198). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
FirestoneW. A. (1996). Leadership roles or functions? In LeithwoodK., ChapmanJ., CorsonD., HallingerP., & HartA. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (Vol. 2, pp. 395–418). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
25.
FirestoneW. A., & BaderB. D. (1992). Redesigning teaching: Professionalism or bureaucracy?Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
26.
FriedmanV. J. (1998). Making schools safe for uncertainty: Teams, teaching, and school reform. Teachers College Record, 99(2), 335–370.
27.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
FullanM., & HargreavesA. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. In FullanM., & HargreavesA. (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change.London: Falmer Press.
29.
FullerW. E. (1989). The teacher in the country school. In WarrenD. (Ed.), American teachers: Histories of a profession at work (pp. 98–117). New York: Macmillan.
30.
GriffinG. A., LiebermanA., & Jacullo-NotoJ. (1983). Interactive research and development on schooling: Executive summary of final report.Austin: University of Texas, Research and Development for Teacher Education.
HackmanJ. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
HackmanJ. R. (1998). Why teams don't work. In TinsdaleR. S. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 245–267). New York: Plenum.
34.
HackmanJ. R., & OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35.
HallerE., & KnappT. (1985). Problems and methodology in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(3), 157–168.
36.
HarrisB., & DrakeS. M. (1997). Implementing high school reform through school-wide action research teams: A three year case study. Action in Teacher Education, 19(3), 15–31.
37.
HartA. W. (1990). Work redesign: A review of literature for education reform. In BacharachS. B. (Ed.), Advances in research and theories of school management and educational policy (Vol. 1, pp. 31–69). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
38.
HellerM. F., & FirestoneW. A. (1995). Who's in charge here? Sources of leadership for change. Elementary School Journal, 96, 65–86.
39.
HensonK. T. (1996). Teachers as researchers. In SikulaJ., ButteryT. J., & GuytonE. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 53–64). New York: Macmillan.
40.
HerriottR. E., & FirestoneW. A. (1984). Two images of schools as organizations: A refinement and elaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(4), 41–57.
41.
HollanderE. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics.New York: Free Press.
42.
ImmegartG. L. (1988). Leadership and leader behavior. In BoyanN. J. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 259–277). New York: Longman.
43.
KerrS., & JermierJ. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 374–403.
44.
KruseS. D., & LouisK. S. (1997). Teaching teaming in middle schools: Dilemmas for a school-wide community. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 261–289.
45.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2000). The effects of different sources of leadership on student engagement in school. In RileyK. A., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Leadership for change and school reform: International perspectives (pp. 50–66). New York: Routledge/Falmer.
46.
LichtensteinG., McLaughlinM. W., & KnudsenJ. (1992). Teacher empowerment and professional knowledge. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), The changing contexts of teaching. Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 37–58). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
47.
LiebermanA., SaxlE. R., & MilesM. B. (1992). Teacher leadership: Ideology and practice. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 148–166). New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
LittleJ. W. (1988). Assessing the prospects for teacher leadership. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 78–106). New York: Teachers College Press.
49.
MaeroffG. I. (1988). The empowerment of teachers: Overcoming the crisis of confidence.New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
MayrowetzD., & WeinsteinC. S. (1999). Sources of leadership for inclusive education: Creating schools for all children. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 423–449.
51.
MechanicD. (1962-63). Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 349–364.
52.
MunceyD. E., & ConleyS. (1999). Teacher compensation and teacher teaming: Sketching the terrain. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(4), 365–385.
53.
MurphyJ. (1990). The educational reform movement of the 1980s: A comprehensive analysis. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational reform movement of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases (pp. 3–55). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
54.
NewmannF. M., & WehlageG. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring.Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin.
55.
OgawaR. T., & BossertS. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224–243.
56.
OlsonM. W. (1990). The teacher as researcher: A historical perspective. In OlsonM. W. (Ed.), Opening the door to classroom research.Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
57.
OrtmanE. J. (1923). Teacher councils: The organized means for securing the co-operation of all workers in the school.Montpelier, VT: Capital City Press.
58.
PappasC. (1997). Making “collaboration” problematic in collaborative school-university research: Studying with urban teacher researchers to transform literacy curriculum genres. In FloodJ., HeathS. B., & LappD. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 215–231). New York: Macmillan.
59.
PitnerN. J. (1988). Leadership substitutes: Their factorial validity in educational organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 307–315.
60.
PorterL. W., AllenR. W., & AngelH. L. (1981). The politics of upward influence in organizations. In CummingsL. L., & StawB. W. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 109–149). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
61.
PounderD. G. (1998). Teacher teams: Redesigning teachers’ work for collaboration. In PounderD. G. (Ed.), Restructuring schools for collaboration: Promises and pitfalls (pp. 65–88). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
62.
PounderD. G. (1999). Teacher teams: Exploring job characteristics and work related outcomes of work group enhancement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 317–348.
63.
PounderD. G., OgawaR. T., & AdamsE. A. (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomenon: Its impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 564–588.
64.
RallisS. (1990). Professional teachers and restructured schools: Leadership challenges. In MitchellB., & CunninghamL. L. (Eds.), Educational leadership and changing contexts of families, communities, and schools. Eighty-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 184–209). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
65.
SmylieM. A. (1997). Research on teacher leadership: Assessing the state of the art. In BiddleB. J. (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 521–592). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
66.
SmylieM. A., & HartA. W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 421–441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
67.
SmylieM. A., WenzelS. A., & FendtC. R. (in press). The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: Lessons on leadership for school development. In MurphyJ., & DatnowA. (Eds.), Leadership for school reform: Lessons from comprehensive school reform designs.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
68.
SpillaneJ., HalversonR., & DiamondJ. B. (2000). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research.
69.
SpillaneJ., HalversonR., & DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.
70.
TannenbaumA. S. (1962). Control in organizations: Individual adjustment and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 236–257.
71.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action.New York: McGraw-Hill.
72.
ThurstonP. W., ZenzK., SchachtM., & CliftR. T. (1995). Exploring leadership. In CliftR. T., & ThurstonP. W. (Eds.), Distributed leadership: School improvement through collaboration (pp. 155–177). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
73.
TikunoffW. J., WardB., & GriffinG. A. (1979). Interactive research and development on teaching study: Final report.San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
74.
WasleyP. A. (1991). Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and the realities of practice.New York: Teachers College Press.
75.
WeiseR., & MurphyJ. (1995). SBM in historical perspective, 1900–1950. In MurphyJ., & BeckL., School-based management as school reform: Taking stock (pp. 93–115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
76.
WitziersB., SleegersP., & ImantsJ. (1999). Departments as teams: Functioning, variations and alternatives. School Leadership and Management, 19, 293–304.
77.
Yendol SilvaD., GimbertB., & NolanJ. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102, 779–804.
78.
YuklG. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
79.
ZeichnerK. M. (1994). Personal renewal and social construction through teacher research. In HollingsworthS., & SockettH. (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform. Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 66–84). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.