AndersonC., & SmithC. (1987). Teaching science. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Educator's handbook: A research perspective.New York: Longman.
2.
AnyonJ. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3–42.
3.
ArgyrisC., & SchonD. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BakkenesI., de BrabanderC., & ImantsJ. (1999). Teacher isolation and communication network analysis in primary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(2), 166–202.
5.
BallD. L., & RundquistS. S. (1993). Collaboration as a context for joining teacher learning with learning about teaching. In CohenD. K., McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 13–42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Bender-SebringP. B., BrykA. S., & EastonJ. Q. (1995). Charting reform: Chicago teachers take stock.Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
7.
BernsteinB. (1971). Class, codes and control (Vol. 1). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8.
BowlesS., & GintisH. A. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America.New York: Basic Books.
9.
BrooksJ. G., & BrooksM. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms.Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
10.
BrophyJ. E., & GoodT. L. (1973). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences.New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
11.
BrownA. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52(4), 399–413.
12.
BrykA., CamburnE., & LouisK. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781.
13.
BrykA., & DriscollM. E. (1985). An empirical investigation of the school as community.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. L. (Eds.). (1993). Inside/Outside: Teacher research and knowledge.New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
CohenD. K., & BallD. L. (1998). Instruction, capacity and improvement (RR–42). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
16.
CohenD. K., & BarnesC. A. (1993). Pedagogy and policy, and Conclusion: A new pedagogy for policy? In CohenD. K., McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 207–276). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
ColemanJ., CampbellE. Q., HobsonC. J., McPartlandJ., MoodA. M., WeinfieldE. D., & YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
ConfreyJ. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science and programming. In CazdenC. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
19.
CookS. D., & YanowD. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. In CohenM. D., & SproullL. (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 430–459). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Darling-HammondL. (1990). Teacher professionalism: Why and how. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now (Vol. 3). Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.
21.
DrakeC., SpillaneJ., & HufferdK. (2000). Storied identities: Teacher learning and subject matter context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 1–43.
22.
Education Trust. (1999). Achievement in America.Washington, DC: Education Trust.
23.
ElmoreR. (1985). Forward and backward mapping: Reversible logic in the analysis of public policy. Political Science Quarterly, 94, 606–616.
24.
FarkasG., GrobeR., SheehanD., & ShaunY. (1990). Cultural resources and school success: Gender, ethnicity, and poverty groups within an urban school district. American Sociological Review, 55(1), 127–142.
25.
FirestoneW. A., & CorbettH. D. (1988). Organizational change. In BoyanN. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (1st ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
26.
Furman-BrownG. (1999). School as community: Editor's foreword. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 6–12.
27.
GoodT. L., & BrophyJ. E. (1987). Looking in classrooms.New York: Harper and Row.
28.
GronnP. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317–338.
29.
HallingerP., & HeckR. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A research of the empirical research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1).
30.
HargreavesA. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age (Professional development and practice).New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
31.
HeathS. B., & MangiolaL. (1991). Children of promise: Literate activity in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms.Washington, DC: National Education Association.
32.
HubermanM. (1993). The model of the independent artisan in teachers’ professional relations. In LittleJ. W., & McLaughlinM. W. (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 11–50). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
33.
HubermanM. (1994). Research utilization: The state of the art. Knowledge and Policy, 7(4), 13–33.
34.
HubermanM., & MilesM. (1994). Innovation up close: How school improvement works.New York: Plenum.
35.
Hufferd-AcklesK. (1999). Learning by all in a math-talk learning community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
36.
KennedyM. (1991). An agenda for research on teacher learning (Special report). Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
37.
LareauA. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(1), 73–85.
38.
LeithwoodK. (1995). Cognitive perspectives on school leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 5(2), 115–135.
39.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(4), 249–280.
40.
LeithwoodK., & LouisK. S. (Eds.). (1998). Organizational learning in schools.Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
41.
LeithwoodK., & MontgomeryD. (1982). The role of the elementary school principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 309–339.
42.
LittleJ. W., & McLaughlinM. W. (Eds.). (1993). Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts.New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
43.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
LouisK. S., KruseS. & Associates. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
45.
LouisK. S., & MarksH. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student work in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575.
46.
LouisK. S., MarksH., & KruseS. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.
47.
LouisK. S., & SmithB. (1991). Restructuring, teacher engagement and school culture: Perspectives on school reform and the improvement of teachers’ work. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(1), 34–52.
48.
LouisK. S., TooleJ., & HargreavesA. (1999). Rethinking school improvement. In MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 251–275). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49.
MarksH., & LouisK. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Education Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 751–781.
50.
McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (1990). The contexts of teaching in secondary schools: Teachers’ realities.New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
51.
McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's education goals.Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University.
52.
McLaughlinM. W., & YeeS. (1988). School as a place to have a career. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools.New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
MetzM. H. (1994). Desegregation as a necessity and a challenge. Journal of Negro Education, 63(1), 64–76.
54.
NewallA., & SimonH. (1972). Human problem solving.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
55.
NewmannF. M. & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56.
NewmannF. M., KingB., & RigdonM. (1996). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools (Deliverable to OERI). Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
57.
NewmannF. M., & WehlageG. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators.Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin.
58.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality.New Haven: Yale University Press.
59.
OECD. (1999). Education at a glance.Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
60.
OgbuJ. (1994). Racial stratification and education in the United States: Why inequality persists. Teachers College Record, 96(2), 264–298.
61.
PiagetJ. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child.New York: Orion Press.
62.
ReiserB. J., SpillaneJ. P., SteinmullerF., SorsaD., CarneyK., & KyzaE. (2000). Investigating the mutual adaptation process in teachers’ design of technology-infused curricula. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
63.
ResnickL. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In ResnickL., LevineJ., & TeasleyS. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
64.
RichardsonV. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10–18.
65.
RistR. (1970). Social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 411–451.
66.
RowanB. (1991). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. Review of Educational Research (Vol. 16). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
67.
SalomonG., & PerkinsD. (1998). Learning in wonderland: What do computers really offer education? In KerrS. T. (Ed.), Technology and the future of schooling. Ninety-fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
68.
SchmuckR., & RunkelP. (1985). Organization development in schools (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
69.
SchneiderB., & ColemanJ. (Eds.). (1993). Parents, their children, and schools.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
70.
SchwilleJ., PorterA., FlodenR., FreemanD., KnappenL., KuhsT., & SchmidtW. (1983). Teachers as policy brokers in the content of elementary school mathematics. In SchulmanL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 370–391). New York: Longman.
71.
SengeP. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (1st ed.). New York: Currency Doubleday.
72.
SengeP. M., Cambron-McCabeN., LucasT., SmithB., DuttonJ., & KleinerA. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday.
73.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
74.
SiskinL. S. (1994). Is the school the unit of change? Internal and external contexts of restructuring. In GimmettP. P., & NeufeldJ. (Eds.), Teacher development and the struggle for authenticity: Professional growth and restructuring in the context of change (pp. 121–140). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
75.
SparksD., & HirshS. (1997). A new vision for staff development.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
StodolskyS. (1988). The subject matters.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
78.
TalbertJ. E., & McLaughlinM. W. (1993). Understanding teaching in context. In CohenD. K., McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (Eds.), Teaching for understanding (pp. 1–10). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
79.
TalbertJ. E., & McLaughlinM. W. (1994). Teacher professionalism in local school contexts. American Journal of Education, 102(2), 123–153.
80.
TeddlieC., & ReynoldsD. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research.New York: Falmer.
81.
TooleJ. (2001). Mental models, professional learning communities, and the deep structure of school change: Case studies of service learning.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
82.
WheatleyM. J. (1992). Leadership and the new science: Learning about organization from an orderly universe.San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
83.
WohlstetterP., SmyerR., & MohrmanS. A. (1994). New boundaries for school-based management: The high involvement model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), 268–286.
84.
WoodT., CobbP., & YackelE. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 587–616.