AdamsJ. E., & KirstM. W. (1999). New demands and concepts for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 463–490). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
American Educational Research Association. (2000). AERA position statement concerning high-stakes testing in pre-K–12 education.Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2001). Kids count. Retrieved from www.aecf.org
4.
AnyonJ. (1997). Ghetto schools: A political economy of urban educational reform.New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
BarnettW. S. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children, 5(3), 25–50.
6.
BeckerG. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education.New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
BensonC. S. (1978). The economics of public education (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
BerlinerD. C., & BiddleB. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud and the attack on America's public schools.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
9.
BlountJ. M. (1998). Destined to rule the schools: Women and the superintendency, 1873–1995.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
10.
CallahanR. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CizekG. J. (2001). Conjectures on the rise and fall of standard setting: An introduction to context and practice. In CizekG. J. (Ed.), Setting performance standards (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
CluneW. H. (1994). The shift from equity to adequacy in school finance. Educational Policy, 8(4), 376–394.
13.
CohenD. K., & HillH. C. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.
14.
DealT. E., & PetersonK. D. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom.New York: The New Press.
16.
DenisonE. F. (1962). The sources of economic growth in the United States.New York: Committee on Economic Development.
17.
Editorial Projects in Education. (2001). A better balance: Standards, tests, and the tools to succeed: Quality Counts 2001.Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education.
18.
Educational Research Service. (1998). Is there a shortage of qualified candidates for openings in the principalship? An exploratory study. Retrieved March 18, 2001 from: http://www.naesp.org/misc/shortage.htm
19.
ElmoreR. F. (1993). The role of local school districts in instructional improvement. In FuhrmanS. H. (Ed.), Designing coherent educational policy: Improving the system (pp. 96–124). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
EubanksS. C., & WeaverR. (1999). Excellence through diversity: Connecting the teacher quality and teacher diversity agendas. The Journal of Negro Education, 68(3), 451–459.
21.
FirestoneW. A. (1994). Redesigning teacher salary systems for educational reform. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 549–574.
22.
FowlerF. C. (2000). Policy studies for educational leaders.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
23.
FuhrmanS. H., ElmoreR. F. (1990). Understanding local control in the wake of state educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(1), 82–96.
24.
FullanM. (1991). The meaning of educational change.New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
GarnerC. W. (In press). Education finance for school leaders: Strategic planning and administration.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
HussarW. J. (1999). Predicting the need for newly hired teachers in the United States to 2008-09. National Center for Educational Statistics. Washington, DC: US Government Printing. Retrieved March 18, 2001 from: http//nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=1999026
27.
Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium. (1996). Standards for school leaders.Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
28.
JamiesonA., CurryA., & MartinezG. (2001). School enrollment in the United States—Social and economic characteristics of students. U.S. Census Bureau: Current population reports.
29.
JeraldC., & OlsonL. (2000). Quality Counts 2000: Who should teach.Bethesda, MD: Education Week.
30.
JohnsonS. M. (1996). Leading to change: The challenge of the new superintendency.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
KruegerA. B., & WhitmoreD. M. (2001). The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on college-test taking and middle school test results: Evidence from Project Star. The Economic Journal, 111(468), 1–28.
33.
LaddH. F., & HansenJ. S. (Eds.). (1999). Making money matter: Financing America's schools.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34.
LaddH. F. (1996). Holding schools accountable.Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
35.
LashwayL., & AndersonM. (1996). Developing school leaders. In SmithS. C., & PieleP. K. (Eds), School leadership: Handbook for excellence (3rd ed., pp. 72–100). ERIC: University of Oregon.
36.
LuggC. A. (1996). For God and country: Conservatism and American school policy.New York: Peter Lang.
37.
MazzoniT. L. (1995). State policy-making and school reform: Influences and influentials. In ScribnerJ. D., & LaytonD. H. (Eds.), The study of educational politics (pp. 53–75). Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.
38.
McGinnD. (2000). There's just no substitute. Newsweek, 136(14), 42.
39.
McNeilL. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing.New York: Routledge.
40.
MerzC., & FurmanG. (1997). Community and schools: Promise and paradox.New York: Teachers College Press.
41.
MilesK., BouchardF., WinnerK., CohenM. A., & GuineyE. (1999). Professional development spending in the Boston public schools.Boston: Boston Plan for Excellence.
42.
MurphyJ. (1991). Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena.New York: Teachers College Press.
43.
National Alliance of Business. (2000). Improving performance: Competition in American public education.Washington, DC: National Alliance of Business.
44.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Digest of Educational Statistics, 2000.Washington, DC: Author.
45.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
46.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
47.
OddenA., & DoughertyV. (1982). State programs of school improvement: A 50-state survey.Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
48.
OlsonL. (2000, October 27). Children of change. Education Week.
49.
PerkinsonH. J. (1991). The imperfect panacea: American faith in education, 1865–1990.New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
50.
PicusL. O. (2001, December). Defining adequacy: What does it mean for school board members?American School Board Journal, 188(12), 28–30.
51.
PsacharopoulosG. (1981). Returns to education: An updated international comparison. Comparative Education17, 321–341.
52.
PsacharopoulosG. (1985). Returns to education: A further international update and implications. The Journal of Human Resources20, 583–604.
53.
ReichR. B. (1992). The work of nations.New York: Vintage Books.
54.
RofesE. (1998). How are school districts responding to charter school laws and charter schools?Berkeley, CA: Policy Analysis for California Education.
55.
RousmaniereK. (1997). City teachers: Teachers and school reform in historical perspective.New York: Teachers College Press.
56.
SchallerM. (1992). Reckoning with Reagan: America and its president in the 1980s.New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
SchultzT. W. (1963). The economic value of education.New York: Columbia University Press.
58.
SmithA. (1976). An inquiry into the nature and cause of the wealth of nations.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
SmithS. C., & PieleP. K. (Eds.). (1996). School leadership: Handbook for excellence (3rd ed.). ERIC: University of Oregon.
60.
TirozziG. N., & FerrandinoV. L. (2000, October 18). Principals’ perspective: The shortage of principals continues. Education Week. Retrieved June 5, 2001 from: http://www.nassp.org/news/views/prin_short1000.htm
61.
TofflerA., & TofflerH. (1995). Creating a new civilization.Atlanta, GA: Turner Publishing.
62.
TyackD. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
TyackD., & HansotE. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980.New York: Basic Books.
65.
WhitfordB. L., & JonesK. (2000). Kentucky lesson: How high stakes school accountability undermines a performance-based curriculum vision. In WhitfordB. L., & JonesK. (Eds.), Accountability, assessment, and teacher commitment: Lessons from Kentucky's reform efforts (pp. 9–24). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
66.
WoodhallM. (1987). Human capital concepts. In PsacharopoulosG. (Ed.), Economics of education: Research and students (pp. 21–24). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.