AdamsJ., & KirstM. (1999). New demands and concepts for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In MurphyJ., and LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 463–490). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
BegleyP. T. (1999). Values and educational leadership.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
5.
BerlakH., & BerlakC. (1981). Dilemmas of schooling.London: Methuen.
6.
BlumbergA. (1985). The school superintendent: Living with conflict.New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CampbellE. (1996). Suspended morality and the denial of ethics: How value relativism muddles the distinction between right and wrong in administrative decisions. In JacobsonS. L., HickcoxE. S., & StevensonR. B. (Eds.), School administration—Persistent dilemmas in preparation and practice (pp. 63–74). Westport, CT: Praeger.
9.
Cohen-VogelL., & GoldringE.School choice in the public market: Magnet programs and patterns of influence. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Leadership and Organizations, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
10.
ColemanJ. (1987). Families and schools. Educational Researcher, 16(6), 32–38.
11.
Consortium on Productivity in Schools (1995). Using what we have to get the schools we need: A productivity focus for American education.New York: Institute on Education and the Economy, Teachers College, Columbia University.
12.
CrowsonR. (1992). School-community relations under reform.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
13.
CubanL. (1992). Managing dilemmas while building professional communities. Educational Researcher, 21, 4–11.
14.
CubanL. (1996). Reforming the practice of educational administration through managing dilemmas. In JacobsonS. L., HickcoxE. S., & StevensonR. B. (Eds.), School administration—Persistent dilemmas in preparation and practice (pp. 3–17). Westport, CT: Praeger.
15.
CubanL. (2001). How can I fix it.New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
DeweyJ. (1922). Human nature and conduct.New York: Random House.
17.
DimmockC. (1996). Dilemmas for school leaders in restructuring. In LeithwoodK., ChapmanJ., CorsonD., HallingerP., & HartA. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 135–170). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18.
ElmoreR. (1990). Introduction: Changing the structure of public schools. In ElmoreR., and Associates (Eds.), Restructuring schools (pp. 1–28). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Empowerment, a new covenant with America's communities: President Clinton's national urban policy report. (1995). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
20.
EtzioniA. (1998). The essential communitarian reader.New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
GlatterR. (1996). Managing dilemmas in education: The tightrope walk of strategic choice in autonomous institutions. In JacobsonS. L., HickcoxE. S., & StevensonR. B. (Eds.), School administration—Persistent dilemmas in preparation and practice (pp. 18–29). Westport, CT: Praeger.
22.
GoddardR. D., SweetlandS. R., & HoyW. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683–702.
23.
GoldringE., & HausmanC. (2001). Civic capacity and school principals: The missing link in community development. In CrowsonR., & BoydB. (Eds.), Community development and school reform.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24.
GrahamP. A. (1993). What America has expected of its schools over the past century. American Journal of Education, 101, 83–98.
25.
GreenfieldW. D. (1999, April). Moral leadership: Fact or fancy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
26.
GronnP. C. (1983). Talk as the work: The accomplishment of educational administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 1–21.
27.
GuthrieJ. (2001). Contracted solutions to urban education problems. In WangM., & WalbergH. (Eds.), School choice or best systems: What improves education? (pp. 357–374). New York: Erlbaum.
28.
HallingerP., & HeckR. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
29.
HargreavesD. (1994). The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 423–438.
30.
HessG. A. (1991). School restructuring Chicago style.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
31.
HillP., PierceL., & GuthrieJ. (1997). Reinventing public education.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
HolmesB. (1965). Problems in education: A comparative approach.London: Routledge & Kegan.
33.
HoachlanderG., AltM., & BeltranenaR. (2001). Leading school improvement: What research says.Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
34.
KirstM. W., McLaughlinM., & BassellD. (1989). Rethinking children's policy: Implications for educational administration.Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, Center for Educational Research at Stanford, College of Education.
35.
LeithwoodK., & DukeD. (1999). A century's quest to understand school leadership. In MurphyJ., and LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 45–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
LeithwoodK., & SteinbachR. (1995). Expert problem solving.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
37.
LittleJ. W. (1999). Organizing schools for teacher learning. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
LittleJ. W., & McLaughlinM. W. (Eds.). (1993). Teachers’ work.New York: Teachers College Press.
39.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
McLaughlinM. W. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning.Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching.
42.
MurphyJ. (1999, April). The quest for a center: Notes on the state of the profession of educational leadership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
43.
MurphyJ., & BeckL. (1995). School based management as school reform.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
44.
MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (1999). Handbook of research on educational administration.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards(n.d.). What teachers should know and be able to do.Washington, DC: Author.
46.
NewmannF. M., KingM. B., & RigdonM. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 41–74.
47.
OgawaR., CrowsonR., & GoldringE. (1999). Enduring dilemmas of school organization. In MurphyJ., and LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 277–295). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48.
RowanB. (1995). Learning, teaching, and educational administration: Toward a research agenda. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(3), 344–354.
49.
SmrekarC., & GoldringE. (1999). School choice in urban America: Magnet schools and the pursuit of equity.New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
SnyderT. D., & HoffmanC. M. (2001). Digest of Education Statistics, 2000. (NCES No. 2001-034). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
51.
StarrattR. J. (1991). Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 185–202.
52.
StricherzM. (2001, January 17). Law giving principals new powers under fire in Arizona. Education Week, p. 22.
53.
SweetlandS. R., & HoyW. K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 703–729.
54.
SykesG. (1991). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools. In ElmoreR., & Associates (Eds.), Restructuring schools (pp. 59–96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
SykesG. (1999). The “new professionalism” in education: An appraisal. In MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 227–250). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
TimpaneM., & ReichB. (1997). Revitalizing the ecosystem for youth. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(6), 464–470.
58.
ToenjesL. A., DworkinA., GaryL., JonH., & AntwanettN. (2000). The lone star gamble: High stakes testing, accountability and student achievement in Texas and Houston. Unpublished manuscript, The Sociology of Education Research Group (SERG), Department of Sociology, The University of Houston.
59.
WinterR. (1982). Dilemma analysis: A contribution to methodology for action research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 12(3), pp. 166–173.
60.
WongK. (2000). Mayoral control as a reform strategy to raise performance in urban schools. Manuscript.
61.
WongK., DreebenR., LynnL.Jr., & SundermanG. (1997). Integrated governance as a reform strategy in the Chicago Public Schools.Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Education.
62.
YairG. (2000). Not just about time: Instructional practices and productive time in school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 485–512.