Role models have long been thought to play an important role in young peoples’ development. The present study explores the ways that race- and gender-matched role models can provide young people with a greater sense of the opportunities available to them in the world. A longitudinal study of young adolescents (N = 80) revealed that students who reported having at least one race- and gender-matched role model at the beginning of the study performed better academically up to 24 months later, reported more achievement-oriented goals, enjoyed achievement-relevant activities to a greater degree, thought more about their futures, and looked up to adults rather than peers more often than did students without a race- and gender-matched role model. These effects held only for race- and gender-matched role models—not for non-matched role models. Finally, the results held irrespective of the educational achievements of the specific role model. Data are discussed in terms of their implications for our understanding of the ways that young people become invested in academic pursuits and the means by which we might be able to assist goal development among young people.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth-DarnellJ. W., & DowneyD. B. (1998). Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63, 536–553.
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
BaumeisterR. F. (1997). Identity, self-concept, and self-esteem: The self lost and found. In HoganR., JohnsonJ., and BriggsS. (Eds.). Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 681–710). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
CantorN., & MischelW. (1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38–48.
5.
CantorN., & MischelW. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 12. New York: Academic Press.
6.
CooleyC. H. (1982). Human nature and the social order.New York: Scribners.
7.
EchevarriaP. (1998). For all our daughters: How mentoring helps young women and girls master the art of growing up.Worcester, MA: Chandler House Press.
8.
EriksonE. H. (1950). Childhood and society.New York: Norton.
9.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis.New York: Norton.
10.
FordhamS. (1998). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital High.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
FreudS. (1949/1969). An outline of psychoanalysis.New York: Norton.
12.
FriedmanS. (1995). Beyond white and other: Relationality and narratives of race in feminist discourse. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 21 (1), 1–49.
13.
GollwitzerP. M., & KirchhofO. (1998). The willful pursuit of identity. In HeckhausenJ., & DweckC. S. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span (pp. 389–423). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
GougisR. A. (1986). The effects of prejudice and stress on the academic performance of Black-Americans. In NeisserU. (Ed). The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 145–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
GriffithsM. (1995). Feminisms and the self.New York: Routledge.
16.
HabermasT., & BluckS. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 748–769.
17.
HarterS. (1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective.New York: Guilford Press.
LeondariA., SyngollitouE., & KiosseoglouG. (1998). Academic achievement, motivation, and future selves. International Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7, 165–177.
20.
MarciaJ. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In AdelsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology.New York: John Wiley.
21.
MarkusH., & NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
22.
McAdamsD. P. (1999). Personal narratives and the life story. In PervinL. A., & JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2nd ed. (pp. 478–500). New York: Guilford Press.
23.
McLuhanM. (1967). The medium is the message.New York: Bantum Books.
24.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
NiedenthalP. M., CantorN., & KihlstromJ. F. (1985). Prototype matching: A strategy for social decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 575–584.
26.
NiedenthalP. M., & MordkoffJ. T. (1991). Prototype distancing: A strategy for choosing among threatening situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 483–493.
27.
OgbuJ. U. (1991). Low performance as an adaptation: The case of Blacks in Stockton, CA. In GibsonM. A., & OgbuJ. U. (Eds.), Minority status and schooling (pp. 249–285). New York: Grand Publishing.
28.
OysermanD., GantL., & AgerL. (1995). A socially contextualized model of African American identity: Possible selves and school persistence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1216–1232.
29.
RieszE. D., McNabbT. F., & StephenS. L. (1997). Gender patterns in science attitudes and achievement: Report of a longitudinal study. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 3, 161–184.
30.
RobstJ. (1996, May). Female role models: The effects of gender composition of faculty on student retention. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Albuquerque, NM.
31.
RubleD. (1983). The development of social comparison processes and their role in achievement-related self-socialization. In HigginsE. T., RubleD., & HartupW. (Eds.), Social cognition and social behavior: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 134–157). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SchlenkerB. R., BrittT. W., & PenningtonJ. (1996). Impression regulation and management: Highlights of a theory of self-identification. In SorrentinoR. M., & HigginsE. T. (Ed.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3: The interpersonal context (pp. 118–147). New York: Guilford Press.
33.
SkinnerB. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity.New York: Knopf.
34.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–619.
35.
SteeleC. M., & AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
36.
StrykerS. (1980). Symbolic interactionism.Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
37.
SumrallW. J. (1995). Reasons for perceived images of scientists by race and gender of students in grades 1–7. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 83–90.
38.
TaylorR. D., CastenR., FlickengerS. J., & RobertsD. (1994). Explaining the school performance of African-American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 21–44.
39.
WatermanA. (1999). Identity, the identity statuses, and identity status development: A contemporary statement. Developmental Review, 19, 591–621.
