This paper explores the proposition that educational management is a gendered construction. The author utilizes Scott's analytic model, which distinguishes gender as sexual difference, denoted by cultural symbols, signs, and representations; and gender as a signifier of power, identified by four different types of social relationships. Against this model, the author casts a gender-specific metaphor (“leader as mother”) and a gender-neutral one (“leader as visionary”). Applying model to metaphor offers a mechanism to expose gendered assumptions about educational management. Such an analytic device forces an examination of educational management with women at the center, rather than at the periphery, of the construction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerS., LaneyJ., & PackerM. (1993). Managing women: Feminism and power in educational management.Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
2.
BarleyS. R. (1983). Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 393–413.
3.
BarnardC. I. (1938). Functions of an executive.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BassB. M. (1960). Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior.New York: Harper & Row.
BellC., & ChaseS. (1994). The underrepresentation of women in school leadership. In MarshallC. (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender.Washington, DC: Falmer.
BlackM. (1993). More about metaphor. In OrtonyA. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BloomL. R., & MunroP. (1995). Conflicts of selves: Nonunitary subjectivity in women administrators’ life history narratives. In HatchJ. A., & WisniewskiR. (Eds.), Life history and narrative.Washington, DC: Falmer.
10.
BlountJ. M. (1998). Destined to rule the schools: Women and the superintendency 1873–1995.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
11.
BolmanL. G., & DealT. E. (1989). Modern approaches to understanding and managing organizations.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
BredesonP. V. (1985). An analysis of the metaphorical perspectives of school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21 (1): 29–50.
13.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership.New York: Harper & Row.
14.
CapperC. (Ed.). (1993). Educational administration in a pluralistic society.New York: State University of New York Press.
15.
ChaseS. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment.Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
16.
CherryholmesC. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education.New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
ConwayJ. K. (1994). True north: A memoir.New York: First Vintage Books edition, 1995.
18.
CraftC. J. S. (1987). Missing principal parts: Personal experiences of women in school administration. In HarringtonS., HufferL., HutchisonC., & SpencerS. (Eds.), New occasional papers in women's studies (Vol. 1, pp. 1–108). Ann Arbor, MI: Women's Studies Program, University of Michigan.
19.
DunlapD. M., & SchmuckP. A. (Eds.). (1995). Women leading in education.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20.
EislerR. (1987). The chalice and the blade: Our history, our future.San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
21.
FayolH. (1949). General and industrial management. Trans. Constance Storrs. London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.
22.
FeldmanM. S. (1995). Strategies for interpreting qualitative data.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
FinkelsteinB. (1989). Conveying messages to women: Higher education and the teaching profession in historical perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 32 (6): 680–699.
24.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
GrahamP. (Ed.). (1995). Mary Parker Follett—Prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
26.
GrantG. (1988). The world we created at Hamilton High.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
GriemasA. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
GroganM. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
29.
HeckR. H. (1998). Conceptual and methodological issues in investigating principal leadership across cultures. Peabody Journal of Education, 73 (2): 51–80.
30.
HooksB. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black.Boston, MA: South End Press.
31.
JonesE. H., & MontenegroX. P. (1983). Women and minorities in school administration: Strategies for making a difference. (ERIC/CUE Urban Diversity Series No. 85) Washington, DC: National Institute of Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 237 607).
32.
KanterR. (1977). Men and women of the corporation.New York: Basic Books.
33.
LatherP. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within/in the postmodern.New York: Routledge.
34.
ManningP. K. (1979). Metaphors of the field: Varieties of organizational discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 660–671.
35.
ManningP. K. (1987). Semiotics and fieldwork.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
MarshallC. (Ed.). (1994). The new politics of race and gender.Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
MarshallJ. (1984). Women managers: Travellers in a male world.Chichester, UK: Wiley.
39.
MartinJ. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organizational Science, 1 (4): 339–359.
40.
MartinJ. R. (1985). Reclaiming a conversation: The ideal of the educated woman.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
McPheeR. (1996). Orchestrating community involvement. Educational Leadership, 53 (4): 71–74.
42.
MetcalfH. C., & UrwickL. (1941). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett.New York: Harper.
43.
MinnichE. K. (1990). Transforming knowledge.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
44.
MorganG. (1986). Images of organization.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45.
MurphyJ. F. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In ThurstonP. W., & LottoL. S. (Eds.), Recent advances in educational administration (Vol. 1B, pp. 163–200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
46.
NoddingsN. (1985). In search of the feminine. Teachers College Record, 87 (2): 195–204.
47.
NoddingsN. (1990). Feminist critiques in the professions. Review of Research in Education, 16, 393–424.
48.
OchshornJ. (1994). Woman as witch: The Renaissance and Reformations revisited. In DeatsS. M., & LenkerL. T. (Eds.), Gender and academe: Feminist pedagogy and politics.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
49.
OrtizF. I. (1982). Career patterns in education: Women, men and minorities in public school administration.New York: Praeger.
50.
OrtizF. I., & OrtizD. J. (1994). Politicizing executive action: The case of Hispanic female superintendents. In MarshallC. (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender.Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
51.
PenceL. J. (1995). Learning leadership through mentorships. In DunlopD. M., & SchmuckP. A. (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 125–144). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
52.
ReganH. B. (1990). Not for women only: School administration as a feminist activity. Teachers College Record, 91 (4): 565–577.
53.
RestineL. N. (1993). Women in administration: Facilitators for change.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
54.
ScottJ. W. (1983). Women's history: The modern period. Past and Present, 101, 141–157.
55.
ScottJ. W. (1986, December). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. Journal of the American Historical Society, 1053–1075.
56.
SearleJ. R. (1993). Metaphor. In OrtonyA. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
SergiovanniT. J. (1994). Organizations or communities? Changing the metaphor changes the theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30 (2): 214–226.
58.
ShakeshaftC. (1989). Women in educational administration (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59.
ShakeshaftC. (1993). Gender equity in schools. In CapperC. A. (Ed.), Educational administration in a pluralistic society (pp. 86–109). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
60.
SimonH. (1957). Administrative behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
61.
SmithD. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
62.
StarrattR. J. (1996). Transforming educational administration: Meaning, community, and excellence.New York: McGraw-Hill.
63.
TaylorF. (1911). The principles of scientific management.New York: Harper & Row. Reprinted in 1945.
64.
TetreaultM. K. (1976, July/August). Feminist phase theory. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 363–384.
65.
TichyN. M., & DevannaM. A. (1986). The transformational leader.New York: John Wiley.
66.
TurnerC. W. (1984). Psychosocial barriers to black women's career development (Work in Progress No. 84–04). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center.
67.
TyackD., & HansotE. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980.New York: Basic Books.
68.
WeberM. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations. Ed. Talcott Parsons, trans. A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons. New York: Free Press.
69.
WeedonC. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructural theory.New York: Basil Blackwell.
