This essay argues that the landscape of educational control is being reshaped in the post-industrial era. It reviews the current governance problems in education and details the range of possible governance models for post-industrial schooling. The analysis begins by describing the problems that governance must address and identifying the professional-statist domination of school governance and the reliance on bureaucratic mechanisms to exercise control as the two most serious contemporary governance problems. The discussion then moves to a description of the various possiblilities for school governance in the future. Five types of control processes are considered: state control, citizen control, professional control, community control, and market control. The paper concludes by outlining the design principles that form the basis for rethinking school governance in a post-industrial world: localism, direct democracy, lay control, choice, and democratic professionalism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarberB. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age.Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
BaumanP. C. (1996, November). Governing education in an antigovernment environment. Journal of School Leadership, 6 (6), 625–643.
3.
BeersD., & ElligJ. (1994). An economic view of the effectiveness of public and private schools. In HakimS., SeidenstatP., & BowmanG. W. (Eds.), Privatizing education and educational choice: Concepts, plans, and experiences (pp. 19–38). Westport, CT: Praeger.
4.
BerlinerD. C., & BiddleB. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
BraceyG. W. (1992, March). How bad are our schools?Principal, 71 (4), 14, 16, 18.
6.
BraceyG. W. (1993, October). The third Bracey report on the condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 75 (2), 104–117.
7.
BradleyA. (1995). Public backing for schools is called tenuous. Education Week, 15 (7), 1, 13.
8.
BuchananJ. M. (1977). Why does government grow? In BorcherdingT. E. (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth (pp. 3–18). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
CampbellR. F., FlemingT., NewellL., & BennionJ. W. (1987). A history of thought and practice in educational administration.New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
ChubbJ. E., & MoeT. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
11.
CibulkaJ. G. (1996, May). Afterword: Interpreting the religious impulse in American schooling. Education and Urban Society, 28 (3), 378–387.
12.
ClarkD. L., & MeloyJ. M. (1989). Renouncing bureaucracy: A democratic structure for leadership in schools. In SergiovanniT. J., & MooreJ. A. (Eds.), Schooling for tomorrow: Directing reform to issues that count (pp. 272–294). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Committee for Economic Development. (1994). Putting learning first: Governing and managing the schools for high achievement.New York: Author.
14.
Consortium on Productivity in the Schools. (1995). Using what we have to get the schools we need.New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, The Institute on Education and the Economy.
15.
Consortium on Renewing Education. (1998). 20020 vision: A strategy for doubling America's academic achievement by the year 2000.Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, Peabody Center for Education Policy.
16.
CoonsJ. E., & SugarmanS. D. (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control.Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
CroninT. E. (1989). Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum, and recall.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
DanzbergerJ. P. (1992). School boards: A troubled institution. In The Twentieth Century Fund/Danforth Foundation, Facing the challenge: The report of The Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on School Governance (pp. 19–129). New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
19.
DavidJ. L. (1989, May). Synthesis of research on school-based management. Educational Leadership, 46 (8), 45–53.
20.
De HoogR. H. (1984). Contracting out for human services: Economic, political, and organizational perspectives.Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
DonahueJ. D. (1989). The privatization decision: Public ends, private means.New York: Basic Books.
22.
EliotT. H. (1969). Toward an understanding of public school politics. In RosenthalA. (Ed.), Governing education: A reader on politics, power, and public school policy (pp. 3–35). New York: Anchor.
23.
ElmoreR. (1990). Introduction: On changing the structure of public schools. In ElmoreR., & Associates (Eds.), Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reforms (pp. 1–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
ElmoreR. F. (1993). School decentralization: Who gains? Who loses? In HannawayJ., & CarnoyM. (Eds.), Decentralization and school improvement (pp. 33–54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
ElshtainJ. B. (1995). Democracy on trial.New York: Basic Books.
26.
FineM. (1993, Winter). A diary on privatization and on public possibilities. Educational Theory, 43 (1), 33–39.
27.
FitzgeraldR. (1988). When government goes private: Successful alternatives to public services.New York: Universe Books.
28.
FlorestanoP. S. (1991). Considerations for the future. In KempR. L. (Ed.), Privatization: The provision of public services by the private sector (pp. 291–296). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
29.
GibbsN. (1997, July 7). The backbone of America. Time, 150 (1), 40–45.
30.
GlickmanC. D. (1990, September). Pushing school reform to a new edge: The seven ironies of school empowerment. Phi Delta Kappan, 71 (1), 68–75.
31.
GormleyW. T. (1991). The privatization controversy. In GormleyW. T. (Ed.), Privatization and its alternatives (pp. 3–16). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
32.
GottfriedP. (1993). The conservative movement (Rev. ed.). New York: Twayne.
33.
GuthrieJ. W. (1997, October). The paradox of educational power: How modern reform proposals miss the point. Education Week, 17 (7), 34.
34.
HakimS., SeidenstatP., & BowmanG. W. (1994). Introduction. In HakimS., SeidenstatP., & BowmanG. W. (Eds.), Privatizing education and educational choice: Concepts, plans, and experiences (pp. 1–15). Westport, CT: Praeger.
35.
HansonE. M. (1991). School-based management and educational reform: Cases in the USA and Spain. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 336 832).
36.
HawleyW. D. (1995, Summer). The false premises and false promises of the movement to privatize public education. Teachers College Record, 96 (4), 735–742.
37.
HeinzD. (1983). The struggle to define America. In LiebmanR. C., & WuthrowR. (Eds.), The New Christian Right: Mobilization and legitimation (pp. 133–148). New York: Aldine.
38.
HemmingR., & MansoorA. M. (1988). Privatization and public enterprises. (Occasional Paper No. 56). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
39.
HillP. T. (1994). Public schools by contract: An alternative to privatization. In HakimS., SeidenstatP., & BowmanG. W. (Eds.), Privatizing education and educational choice: Concepts, plans, and experiences.Westport, CT: Praeger.
40.
HillP. T., & BonanJ. (1991). Decentralization and accountability in public education.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
41.
HillP., PierceL. C., & GuthrieJ. W. (1997). Private provision in the public interest.Chicago: University of Chicago.
42.
HimmelsteinJ. L. (1983). The New Right. In LiebmanR. C., & WuthrowR. (Eds.), The New Christian Right: Mobilization and legitimation (pp. 13–30). New York: Aldine.
43.
HirschW. Z. (1991). Privatizing government services: An economic analysis of contracting out by local governments.Los Angeles: University of California, Institute of Industrial Relations.
44.
HoodC. (1994). Explaining economic policy reversals.Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
45.
HulaR. C. (1990a). Preface. In HulaR. C. (Ed.), Market-based public policy (pp. xiii–xiv). New York: St. Martin's Press.
46.
HulaR. C. (1990b). Using markets to implement public policy. In HulaR. C. (Ed.), Market-based public policy (pp. 3–18). New York: St. Martin's Press.
47.
KatzM. B. (1971, Summer). From voluntarism to bureaucracy in American education. Sociology of Education, 44 (3), 297–332.
48.
KatzM. B. (1992). Chicago school reform as history. Teachers College Record, 94 (1), 56–72.
49.
KaufmanJ. (1996). Suburban parents shun many public schools, even the good ones. Network News & Views, 14 (5), pp. 72–73.
50.
KolderieT. (1991). Two different concepts. In KempR. L. (Ed.), Privatization: The provision of public services by the private sector (pp. 250–261). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
51.
LawtonS. B. (1991, September). Why restructure? Revision of paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
52.
LiebermanM. (1988, Winter). Efficiency issues in educational contracting. Government Union Review, 9, 1–24.
53.
LindelowJ. (1981). School-based management. In SmithS. C., MazzarellaJ. A., & PieleP. K. (Eds.), School leadership: Handbook for survival (pp. 94–129). Eugene: ERIC Clearing House on Educational Management, University of Oregon.
54.
MarshallR., & TuckerM. (1992). Thinking for a living: Work, skills, and the future of the American economy.New York: Basic Books.
55.
MartinB. (1993). In the public interest? Privatization and public sector reform.London: Zed Books.
56.
MathewsD. (1996). Is there a public for public schools?Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation Press.
57.
MayberryM. (1991, April). Conflict and social determinism: The reprivatization of education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
58.
MeltzerA. H., & ScottR. F. (1978, Summer). Why government grows (and grows) in a democracy. The Public Interest, 52, 111–118.
59.
MurnaneR. J., & LevyF. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills: Principles for educating children to thrive in a changing economy.New York: The Free Press.
60.
MurphyJ. (1996). The privatization of schooling: Problems and possibilities.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
61.
NiskanenW. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government.Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
62.
OatesW. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
63.
PackJ. R. (1991). The opportunities and constraints of privatization. In GormleyW. T. (Ed.), Privatization and its alternatives (pp. 281–306). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
64.
PayneJ. L. (1995, November). Profiting from education: Incentive issues in contracting out.Washington, DC: Education Policy Institute.
President's Commission on Privatization. (1988). Privatization: Toward more effective government.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
67.
PutnamR. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6 (1), 65–77.
68.
RichardsC. E., ShoreR., & SawickyM. B. (1996). Risky business: Private management of public schools.Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
69.
RossR. L. (1988). Government and the private sector: Who should do what?New York: Crane Russak.
70.
RothsteinR. (1998). The way we were? The myths and realities of America's student achievement.New York: The Century Foundation.
71.
RungelingB., & GloverR. W. (1991, January). Educational restructuring—The process for change?Urban Education, 25 (4), 415–427.
72.
SackneyL. E., & DibskiD. J. (1992, August). School-based management: A critical perspective. Paper presented at the Seventh Regional Conference of the Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration, Hong Kong.
73.
SarasonS. B. (1995). Parental involvement and the political principle: Why the existing governance structure of schools should be abolished.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74.
SavasE. S. (1982). Privatizing the public sector: How to shrink government.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
75.
SavasE. S. (1987). Privatization: The key to better government.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
76.
SeeleyD. S. (1980, February). The bankruptcy of service delivery.Paper presented to the Foundation Lunch Group: Panel on Children, at the Edwin Gould Foundation for Children, New York, NY.
77.
SizerT. R. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
78.
SnauwaertD. T. (1993). Democracy, education, and governance: A developmental conception.Albany: State University of New York Press.
79.
StarrP. (1991). The case for skepticism. In GormleyW. T. (Ed.), Privatization and its alternatives (pp. 25–36). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
80.
SwansonA. D. (1989, August). Restructuring educational governance: A challenge of the 1990s. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25 (3), 268–293.
81.
TullockG. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy.Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
82.
The Twentieth Century Fund/Danforth Foundation. (1992). Facing the challenge: The report of The Twentieth Century Fund task force on school governance.New York: Author.
83.
TyackD. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84.
TyackD. (1993). School governance in the United States: Historical puzzles and anomalies. In HannawayJ., & CarnoyM. (Eds.), Decentralization and school improvement (pp. 1–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
85.
UrschelJ. (1995, May 16). Fear, distrust, suspicion of the government. USA Today, pp. 1–2.
86.
WhittyG. (1984, April). The privatization of education. Educational Leadership, 41 (7), 51–54.
87.
ZeiglerL. H., JenningsM. K., & PeakG. W. (1974). Governing American schools: Political interaction in local school districts.North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
