Illuminative Evaluation: Meeting the Special Needs of Feminist Projects

Coyner Sandra , 1980. “Women's studies as an academic discipline: why and how to do it.” Pp. 18–40 in Bowles G. , and Duelli-Klein R. , eds., Theories in Women's Studies. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

Mary Daly ., 1973. Beyond God the Father. Boston: Beacon Press.

Duelli-Klein Renate , 1980. “How to do what we want to do: thoughts about feminist methodology.” Pp. 48–64 in Bowles G. , and Duelli-Klein R. , eds., Theories in Women's Studies. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

Eichler Margrit , 1980. The Double Standard: A Feminist Critique of Feminist Social Science. New York: St. Martin's Press

Parlett Malcolm , and Dearden Garry eds., 1977. Introduction to Illuminative Evaluation: Studies in Higher Education. Cardiff-by-Sea, CA: Pacific Sounding Press.

Parlett Malcolm , and Hamilton David , 1978. “Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programs.” Pp. 6–22 In Hamilton D. , eds., Beyond the Numbers Game. London: McMillan.

Shapiro Joan , Secor Cynthia , and Butchart Ann , 1981. “The development of a transportable leadership and management program for women in higher education.” Presented at the American Educational Research Meeting, Los Angeles.

Trow M. A. , 1970. “Methodological problems in the evaluation of innovation.” Pp. 289–305 in Wittrock M. C. , and Wiley D. E. , eds., The Evaluation of Instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Westkott Marcia , 1979. “Feminist criticism in the social sciences.” Harvard Educational Review 49: 422–430.