Building a critical STS (Science and Technology Studies) community entails tensions that emerge from the convergence of diverse pedagogical philosophies, perspectives, and practices. While potentially disruptive, these tensions are generative as they trigger critical reflection, unsettle dominant assumptions, and contribute to the development of critical consciousness. Drawing on qualitative data from an open-ended questionnaire and personal involvement with the critical STS community at Virginia Tech, this paper examines how collaborative tensions function not as obstacles but as drivers of growth essential to developing critical STS pedagogy. Using the theoretical frameworks of Paulo Freire and bell hooks, I argue that while such tensions pose challenges, they also create opportunities to bridge the gap between reflection and practice. Ultimately, the formation of critical STS communities represents a collective effort of educators working toward transformative education and social justice and emphasizes the importance of collaborative tensions as vehicles for growth and innovation.
AndreottiVanessa. 2006. “Soft versus Critical Global Citizenship Education.” Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review3:40–51.
2.
AndreottiVanessa. 2011. Actionable Postcolonial Theory in Education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
CollinsHarryEvansRobert. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science32(2):235–96.
4.
ConleyShannon N.YorkEmilArmstrongEleanor S.BrandtMarisaChanAnitaComissoMartín PérezDietzShelby, et al. 2024. “Provocations from the ‘STS as a Critical Pedagogy’ Workshop.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society10(1–2):103–133.
5.
CreswellJohn W.CreswellJ. David. 2018. Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
DarderAntonia. 2015. Freire and Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
DarderAntonia. 2017. Reinventing Paulo Freire. A Pedagogy of Love. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
DowneyGary Lee. 2008. “The Engineering Cultures Syllabus as Formation Narrative: Critical Participation in Engineering Education through Problem Definition.” University of St. Thomas Law Journal5(2):428–56.
9.
DowneyGary Lee. 2021. “Critical Participation: Inflecting Dominant Knowledge Practices Through STS in Making and Doing.” Pp. 219–44 in Activating STS through Knowledge Expression and Travel, edited by DowneyG. L.Zuiderent-JerakT.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
DowneyGary LeeZuiderent-JerakTeun. 2021. Making and Doing. Activating STS through Knowledge Expression and Travel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
FreirePaulo. 1972. “Education: Domestication or Liberation?” Prospects11(2):173–81.
12.
FreirePaulo. 2000. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing.
13.
FreirePaulo. 2018. Teachers as Cultural Workers. Letters to Those Who Dare Teach. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
Gaztambide-FernándezRubén A.MatuteAlexandra Arráiz. 2014. “‘Pushing Against.’ Relationality, Intentionality, and the Ethical Imperative of Pedagogy.” Pp. 52–64 in Problematizing Public Pedagogy, edited by BurdickJ.SandlinJ.O’MalleyM.New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
GirouxHenry A.2004. “Critical Pedagogy and the Postmodern/Modern Divide: Towards a Pedagogy of Democratization.” Teacher Education Quarterly31(1):31–47. Retrieved (https://www.jstor.org/stable/23478412).
GirouxHenry A.2010b. “Rethinking Education as the Practice of Freedom: Paulo Freire and the Promise of Critical Pedagogy.” Policy Futures in Education8(6):715–21.
18.
HackingIan. 1999. The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
HarawayDonna J.1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies14(3):575–99.
20.
HardingSandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
hooksbell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress. Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
hooksbell. 2010. Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
JasanoffSheila. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. London, UK: Routledge.
24.
KnopesJulia. 2019. “Science, Technology, and Human Health: The Value of STS in Medical and Health Humanities Pedagogy.” Journal of Medical Humanities40:461–71.
25.
KreimerPabloVessuriHebe. 2018. “Latin American Science, Technology, and Society: A Historical and Reflexive Approach.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society1(1):17–37.
26.
LatourBruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
LynchMichael. 2008. “Postmodernism and the Science Wars.” Pp. 193–218 in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., edited by HackettE. J.AmsterdamskaO.LynchM.WajcmanJ.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
MedinaJosé. 2013. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
RondiniAshley. 2020. “Surviving Dangerous Waters: Teaching Critical Consciousness against a Tide of Post-truth.” Humanity & Society44(2):221–32.
30.
ShorIra. 2012. Empowering Education Critical Teaching for Social Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
StrongMyron. 2023. “Towards a Pedagogy of the Future.” Humanity & Society47(2):244.
32.
TallBearKim. 2014. “Standing with and Speaking as Faith: A Feminist-indigenous Approach to Inquiry.” Journal of Research Practice10(2):N17.
33.
VidalNatalia HernándezMooreKelly. 2022. “Seed Schools in Colombia and the Generative Character of Sociotechnical Dissent.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society8(1):171–88.
34.
YorkEmily. 2018. “Doing STS in STEM Spaces: Experiments in Critical Participation.” Engineering Studies10(1):66–84.
