Looking beyond the increasingly common trope of “slacktivism” that frames students as weakly “liking” causes or “tweeting” support through social media, our research analyzes how current students in the United States perceive and participate in action on college campuses. This action note reflects on three insights our research yields about contemporary student engagement: their ambivalence about embracing an “activist” label, their disinclination for direct action, and their thoughtful approach to digital tools. Complicating the view that college students are apathetic or disengaged, we find that students continue to be passionate and engaged, perhaps just not in ways that scholars of social movements might anticipate.
EaganKevinStolzenbergEllen BaraRamirezJoseph J.AragonMelissa C.SuchardMaria RamirzezHurtadoSylvia. 2014. The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2014. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
10.
EarlJenniferKimportKatrina. 2011. Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
EliasophNina. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
FourcadeMarionHealyKieran. 2007. “Moral Views of Market Society.” Annual Review of Sociology33:285–311.
14.
FrankeRayRuizSylviaSharknessJessicaDeAngeloLindaPryorJohn. 2010. Findings from the 2009 Administration of the College Senior Survey (CSS): National Aggregates. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
15.
GladwellMalcolm. 2010. “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” The New Yorker, October 4, pp. 42–49.
MudgeStephanie L.2008. “What Is Neo-liberalism?” Socio-Economic Review6:703–31.
22.
MunsonZiad. 2009. The Making of Pro-life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
PollettaFrancesca. 2008. “Culture and Movements.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science619:78–96.
24.
ReiffJohn D.KeeneArthur S.. 2012. “Best Practices for Promoting Student Civic Engagement: Lessons from the Citizen Scholars Program at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement16:105–27.
25.
SmelserNeil J.2013. Dynamics of the Contemporary University: Growth, Accretion, and Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D.. 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” Pp. 133–55 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited byMorrisAldonMullerCarol McClurg. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
SnowDavid A.RochfordE. BurkeJr.WordenSteven K.BenfordRobert D.. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review51:464–81.
28.
SnyderThomas D.DillowSally A.. 2015. Digest of Education Statistics 2013 (NCES 2015-011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
29.
SouleSarah A.1997. “The Student Divestment Movement in the United States and Tactical Diffusion: The Shantytown Protest.” Social Forces75:855–82.
SwidlerAnn. 1995. “Cultural Power and Social Movements.” Pp. 25–41 in Social Movements and Culture, edited byJohnstonHankKlandermansBert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
TheocharisYannis. 2012. “Cuts, Tweets, Solidarity and Mobilisation: How the Internet Shaped the Student Occupations.” Parliamentary Affairs65:162–94.
