The philosophy of Richard Rorty provides a useful justification for accepting epistemological diversity in sociology. In his view, intradisciplinary debates about what constitutes sociological knowledge are irresolvable because, at root, they are cultural disputes. But Rorty’s philosophy offers more than an elaborate justification for the status quo. He also provides a compelling rationale for sociologists to write passionately. Beyond simply improving our prose, passionate language may imbue sociological research with moral relevance, at least in Rorty’s terms.
AbbottA.2007. “For Humanist Sociology.” Pp. 195–209 in Public Sociology, edited by ClawsonD.ZussmanRobertMisraJoyaGerstelNaomiStokesRandallAndertonDouglas L.BurawoyMichael. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
AppaduraiA.1999. “Globalization and the Research Imagination.” International Social Science Journal51:229–38.
3.
BeckU.1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, England: Sage.
4.
BeckU.2002. “The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited.” Theory, Culture and Society19:39–55.
5.
BeckerH. S.1986. Writing for Social Scientists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BestJ.2004. “Why Don’t They Listen to Us? Fashion Notes on the Imperial Wardrobe.” Social Problems51:154–60.
7.
BlackD.2013. “On the Almost Inconceivable Misunderstandings Concerning the Subject of Value-free Social Science.” The British Journal of Sociology64:763–80.
8.
BurawoyM.2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review70:4–28.
9.
CollinsR.1989. “Sociology: Proscience or Antiscience?” American Sociological Review54:124–39.
10.
DavisJ.1994. “What’s Wrong with Sociology?” Sociological Forum9:179–97.
11.
FraserN.1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
FuchsS.TurnerJ. H.. 1986. “What Makes a Science ‘Mature’?: Patterns of Organizational Control in Scientific Production.” Sociological Theory4:143–50.
13.
GansH. J.2010. “Public Ethnography; Ethnography as Public Sociology.” Qualitative Sociology33:97–104.
14.
GrossN.2002. “Becoming a Pragmatist Philosopher: Status, Self-concept, and Intellectual Choice.” American Sociological Review67:52–76.
15.
GrossN.2003. “Richard Rorty’s Pragmatism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Ideas.” Theory & Society32:93–148.
16.
GrossN.2008. Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
HayesS.2007. “Stalled at the Alter? Conflict, Hierarchy, and Compartmentalization in Burawoy’s Public Sociology.” Pp. 79–90 in Public Sociology, edited by ClawsonD.ZussmanRobertMisraJoyaGerstelNaomiStokesRandallAndertonDouglas L.BurawoyMichael. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
KuhnT. S.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
MasseyD. S.2007. “The Strength of Weak Politics.” Pp. 145–57 in Public Sociology, edited by ClawsonD.ZussmanRobertMisraJoyaGerstelNaomiStokesRandallAndertonDouglas L.BurawoyMichael. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
PivenF. F.2007. “From Public Sociology to Politicized Sociologist.” Pp. 158–66 in Public Sociology, edited by ClawsonD.ZussmanRobertMisraJoyaGerstelNaomiStokesRandallAndertonDouglas L.BurawoyMichael. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
RortyR.1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
RortyR.1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
RortyR.1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
RortyR.1997. “Justice as a Larger Loyalty.” Ethical Perspectives4:139–51.
25.
RortyR.1998. Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
ScottJ. C.1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
ScottJ. C.1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
ScottJ. C.2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
SmithD. E.1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
30.
StacyJ.2007. “If I Were the Goddess of Sociological Things.” Pp. 91–100 in Public Sociology, edited by ClawsonD.ZussmanRobertMisraJoyaGerstelNaomiStokesRandallAndertonDouglas L.BurawoyMichael. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
StinchcombeA. L.1994. “Disintegrated Disciplines and the Future of Sociology.” Sociological Forum9:279–91.
32.
StinchcombeA. L.2007. “Speaking Truth to the Public, and Indirectly to Power.” Pp. 135–44 in Public Sociology, edited by ClawsonD.ZussmanRobertMisraJoyaGerstelNaomiStokesRandallAndertonDouglas L.BurawoyMichael. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
TurnerJ. H.2005. “Is Public Sociology Such a Good Idea?” The American Sociologist36:27–45.
34.
WallersteinI.2007. “The Sociologist and the Public Sphere.” Pp. 169–75 in Public Sociology, edited by ClawsonD.ZussmanRobertMisraJoyaGerstelNaomiStokesRandallAndertonDouglas L.BurawoyMichael. Berkeley: University of California Press.
