Challenging the dominant sociological framework suggesting that U.S. workers have bought into capitalist structures and internalized work cultures, this exploratory study uses the illustrative case study method to explore aspects of solidarity in the diverse workplace. In particular, it examines workers' actions to rectify imbalanced power relations and unjust treatment of those in marginalized statuses of class, race/ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation and physical ability. The focus is on a variety of roles taken on by “privileged allies,” such as inside agitators, creative bureaucrats and coalition builders, who use their organizational clout to stand with marginalized group members. Especially instructive are accounts of those in the “helping professions,” who challenge norms of specialized expertise and professional detachment and return control back to their clients. More research is needed to compare the experience of privileged allies who are themselves members of marginalized groups with those who are dominant group members. More data are also needed to explore conditions in which a single solidarity campaign evolves into an ongoing “culture of solidarity” in the workplace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminzadeRonald. 1979. “The Transformation of Social Solidarities in Nineteenth-Century Toulouse.” In Consciousness and Class Experience in Nineteenth-Century Europe, edited by MerrimanJohn. New York: Holmes and Meier.
2.
BorkmanThomasina. 1990. “Self-Help Groups at the Turning Point: Emerging Egalitarian Alliances with the Formal Health Care System.”American Journal of Community Psychology. 18:321–332.
3.
BourdieuPierrePasseronClaude. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
4.
BrownMichaelCarnoyMartinCurrieElliottDusterTroyOppenheimerDavidShultzMarjorieWellmanDavid. 2003. Whitewashing Race: The Myth of a Color-Blind Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
BrownSherryMazzaGeorge. 1997. Healing into Action. Washington D.C.: National Coalition Building Institute.
6.
BurowayMichael. 1979. Manufacturing Consent: The Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Chrobot-MasonD.FerdmanB.M.. 2001. “A Matter of Difference-Inclusion: What Can I and My Organization Do About It?”The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist. 39:69–74.
8.
ClevelandJeanetteStockdaleMargaretMurphyKevin. 2000. “Gender Discrimination in the Workplace” from Women and Men in Organizations: Sex and Gender Issues at Work. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
DerridaJacques. 1978. Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
DolgonCorey. 2001. “Building Community Amid the Ruins: Strategies for Struggle from the Coalition for Justice at Southhampton College.” in Forging Alliances across Difference, edited by BystydzienskiJillSchachtSteven P.. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
11.
FantasiaRick. 1988. Cultures of Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
GoldthorpeHohn H.LockwoodDavidBechhoferFrankPlattJennifer. 1969. The Affluent Worker in the Class Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GrahamLaurie. 1995. On the Line at Subaru-Isuzu. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR.
14.
GrenierGuillermo. 1988. Inhuman Relations: Quality Circles and Anti-unionism in American Industry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
15.
GunnGiles. 2001. Beyond Solidarity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
HelgesenSally. 1995. The Web of Inclusion. New York. Doubleday.
17.
HiggensGina O'Connell. 1994. Resilient Adults, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
HilfikerDavid. 1994. Not All of Us Are Saints: A Doctor's Journey with the Poor. New York: Random House.
19.
HodsonRandy. 1995. “Worker Resistance: An Underdeveloped Concept in the Sociology of Work.”Economic and Industrial Democracy. 16:79–110.
20.
KanterRosabeth Moss. 1997. Men and Women in the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
21.
KingsolverAnne. 1998. More than Class: Studying Power in US Workplaces. Albany: State University of New York.
22.
KirpDavid. 2000. Almost Home: America's Love-Hate Relationship with Community. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
23.
LeviPrimo. 1996. Survival in Auschwitz. New York: Touchstone.
24.
MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich. 1970. The German Ideology. New York: International Publishers.
25.
MillsWrightC.. 2002. White Collar: The American Middle Classes. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
McKnightJohn. 1995. The Careless Society: Community and its Counterfeits. New York: Harper Collins.
27.
McMurrerDaniel P.SawhillIsabel. 1998. Getting Ahead: Economic and Social Mobility in America. Washington D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
28.
PortesAlejandro. 1998. “Social Capital; Its Origins and Applications in Modern Society.”Annual Review of Sociology, 24:1–24.
29.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRuben. 2006. A Portrait of Immigrant America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
PutnamRobert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
31.
RosenblumKarenTravisToni-Michelle. 2006. The Meaning of Difference. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
32.
RoscignoVincent L.HodsonRandy. 2004. “The Organizational and Social Foundations of Worker Resistance.”American Sociological Review69 (1), 14–39.
33.
ScottJames C.1990Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
SieboldCathy. 1992. The Hospice Movement. New York: Twayne Publications.
35.
SpivakGayatri Chakravorty. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Cambridge: Harvard Press.
36.
StackCarol. 1975. All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community. New York: Harper and Row.
37.
TerkelStuds. 1974. Working. New York: The New Press.
38.
ThomasK. M. (Ed.) 2008. Diversity Resistance in Organizations: Manifestations and Solutions. New York: Taylor and Francis.
39.
VallasSteven P.2006. “Empowerment Redux: Structure, Agency, and the Remaking of Managerial Authority.”American Journal of Sociology111 (6), 1677–1717.
40.
WhyteWilliam H.1956. The Organization Man. New York: Simon and Schuster.
