Property,Law and Violence: A Thematic Analysis of House of Sand and Fog

Balbus Isaac . 1977. “Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the Relative Autonomy of Law,” Law and Society Review 11:571–88.

http://www.beatrice.com/interviews.dubus/.

http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_qa/documents.

http://www.brookbrowse.com/author_interviews/full/index.cfm?auth…

Dubus Andre III 1999. House of Sand and Fog. New York: Vintage.

Friedman Lawrence M. 1990. The Republic of Choice: Law, Authority, and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Galanter Marc . 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” Law and Society Review 9.

Lockwood David . 1992. Solidarity and Schism: The Problem of Disorder in Durkheimian and Marxist Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mestrovich Stjepan . 1988. Emile Durkheim and the Reformation of Sociology. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/jsn/39.1/omara.html.

Posner Richard . 1998. Law and Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Singer Linda . 1990. Settling Disputes. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Stone Alan . 1985. “The Place of the Rule of Law in the Marxian Structure-Superstructure Archetype,” Law and Society Review 19:39–67.

Sturm Douglas . 1998. Solidarity and Suffering. Albany: State University of Lew York Press.

Turkel Gerald . 1992. Dividing Public and Private: Law, Politics and Social Theory. Westport, CN: Praeger.