American Correctional Association. 1954. Manual of Correctional tandards. College Park, MD: American Correctional Association.
2.
AndrewsA.D.ZingerI.HogeD.R.BontaJ.GendreauP., and CullenT.F.1990. Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology28(3) 369–404.
3.
BelenkoS.1998. Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review1(1) 1–42. Washington, DC.: National Drug Court Institute.
4.
BelenkoS.1996. Comparative models of treatment delivery in drug courts. Washington DC.: The Sentencing Project.
5.
BelenkoS. & PeughJ.1998. Fighting crime by treating substance abuse. Issues in Science & Technology15(1) 53–61.
6.
CurridenM.1994. Drug courts gain popularity: Studies show rearrests lower for defendants treated for addiction. ABA Journal80(16) 18.
7.
FarabeeD.PrendergastM., and AnglinD.M.. 1998. Effectiveness of coerced treatment of drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation62(1) 3–10.
8.
GebeleinR. S.2000. The rebirth of rehabilitation: Promise and perils of drug courts. Papers From the Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
9.
GendreauP. and RossR.1987. Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the1980s. Justice Quarterly4(3) 349–407.
10.
GersteinD.R.HarwoodJ.J.. 1990. Treating Drug Problems: Vol. I: A Study of the Evolution, Effectiveness, and Financing of Public and private Drug Treatment Systems: Summary. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
11.
GoldkampJ.1994. Miami's treatment drug court for felony defendants: Some implications of assessment findings. The Prison Journal17(1) 110–166.
12.
HillerL.M.KnightK., and SimpsonD.. 1999. Prison-based substance abuse treatment, residential aftercare and recidivism. Addiction94(6) 833–843.
13.
HoldenA.G.WakefieldP. and ShapiroJ.S.1990. Treatment options for drug-dependent offenders: A review of the literature for state and local decision makers. Washington DC.: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Assistance.
14.
HubbardR. L.1988. Criminal justice clients in drug abuse treatment. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86). Washington, DC.: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
15.
HubbardR.MardsenM.RachalJ.HarwoodH.CavanaughE., and GinzburgH.1989. Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
InciardiJ.MartinS.ButzinC.HooperR., and HarrisonL.1997. An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues27: 261–278.
18.
Institute of Medicine.1997. Dispelling the myths about addiction: Strategies to increase understanding and strengthen research. Washington, DC.: National Academy Press.
19.
KoobG.F.1996. Neuron16: 893.
20.
KoobG. F.1994. Trends in Pharmacological Science. Neuroscience6: 221.
21.
LeshnerA. I.2000. The disease of addiction: Approach to therapy. Lippincott's Primary Care Practice4(3) 249–253.
22.
LeshnerA. I.1999. We can conquer drug addiction. Futurist33(9) 22–29.
23.
LeshnerA. I.1997. Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science278(5335) 45–48.
24.
LiptonS.D. and PearsonF.1996. The CDATE Project: Reviewing research on The Effectiveness of treatment programs for adults and juvenile offenders. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology.
25.
LiptonD.S.1995. The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
26.
MartinS.S.ButzinA.C.SaumA.C., and InciardiA.J.. 1999. Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare. Prison Journal79(3) 294–320.
27.
MartinsonR.1974. What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest35: 22–54.
28.
MurrayD. W.1992. Drug abuse treatment programs in the Federal Bureau of Prisons: Initiatives for the 90s. In LeukefeldG.C. & TimsM.F. (Eds.), Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails, pp. 62–83. Washington, DC.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29.
National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (CASA).1998. Behind Bars: Substance Abuse and America's Prison Population. New York: Steven Belenko.
30.
National Institute of Justice.1988. Attorney General Announces NIJ Drug Use Forecasting System. Research in Action. (NCJ 109957). Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
31.
National Institute on Drug Abuse.1999. Drug Abuse and Addiction Research: 25 Years Of Discovery to Advance the Health of the Public. The Sixth Triennial Report to Congress. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Health.
32.
National Institute of Health.1999. Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research Based Guide. (NIH Publication No. 99-4180). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Health.
33.
NestlerE. J.1996. Molecular Psychiatry. 1: 190.
34.
O'brienP.C. and McLellanA.T.. 1996. Treating drug abusers effectively. Lancet 347: 237.
35.
PetersR.1993. Drug treatment in jails and detention settings. In InciardiJ. (Ed.), Sage Criminal Justice Annuals: Drug Treatment and Criminal Justice27: 44–80. Newbury Park: CA: Sage Publications.
36.
SilvermanJ.I. and VegaM.1996. Corrections: A Comprehensive View. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
37.
TaxmanF. and SpinnerD.1997. Jail addiction services (JAS) demonstration project in Montgomery County, Maryland: Jail and community based substance abuse treatment program model: Final report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Maryland Governor's Commission on Drugs and Alcohol Abuse, Montgomery County (Maryland) Government.
38.
U.S. Department of Justice.1998. Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997 (NCJ 172871). Washington, DC.: Office of Justice Programs 1996. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
39.
U. S. General Accounting Office.1996. Drug and alcohol abuse: Billions spent annually for treatment and prevention activities. Washington, D.C.: U. S. General Accounting Office.
40.
VitoF.G. and TewksburyA.R.. 1998. The impact of treatment: The Jefferson County (Kentucky) drug court program. Federal Probation62(2) 46–57.
41.
WexlerH.DeLeonG.KresselD., and UptonS.D.. 1999. The Amity prison TC Evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior26(2) 147–168.
42.
WishD.E. and JohnsonD.B.. 1986. Impact of substance abuse on criminal careers. In BlumsteinAlfred (Ed.), Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals”: Vol. II. 52–88. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.