We investigate the role of the Mexican government in assisting migrant workers in the labor claims-making process across three consular jurisdictions in the United States. Our analysis of administrative documents finds that consular support varies in relation to the local context within which consulates operate and depends on the circumstances of labor issues. We argue that binational claims, which involve migrants that have returned to Mexico, emerge in local economies characterized by cyclical migration of temporary workers and necessitate particular forms of consular support. This study reveals the diverse ways consulates assist workers and offers insight on how local contexts shape consular support.
Arámbula ReyesAlmaSantos VillarealGabriel Mario. 2008. “Protección Consular a los Mexicanos en el Exterior [Consular Protection for Mexicans Abroad].” Report. Centro de Documentación, Información y Análisis, Dirección de Servicios de Investigación y Análisis, Subdirección de Política Exterior. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/sedia/sia/spe/SPE-ISS-15-08.pdf
2.
ArightJean-ThomasLafleurJean-Michel. 2019. “Where and Why Can Expatriates Vote in Regional Elections? A Comparative Analysis of Regional Electoral Practices in Europe and North America,”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45 (4): 517-538.
3.
BadaXóchitlGleesonShannon. 2014. “A New Approach to Migrant Labor Rights Enforcement: The Crisis of Undocumented Worker Abuse and Mexican Consular Advocacy in the United States.”Labor Studies Journal40 (1): 32-53.
4.
BernhardtAnnetteSpillerMichael W.PolsonDiana. 2013. “All Work and No Pay: Violations of Employment and Labor Laws in Chicago, Los Angeles and New York City.”Social Forces91 (3): 725-46.
5.
BloemraadIreneShearesAlicia. 2017. “Understanding Membership in a World of Global Migration: (How) Does Citizenship Matter.”International Migration Review51 (4): 823-67.
6.
BoboKim. 2008. Wage Theft in America: Why Millions of Working Americans Are Not Getting Paid—And What We Can Do about It. New York: New Press.
ColvinAlexander J.GoughMark D.2015. “Individual Employment Rights Arbitration in the United States: Actors and Outcomes.”ILR Review68 (5): 1019-42.
11.
CostaDaniel. 2018. California Leads the Way: A look at California Laws that Help Protect Labor Standards for Unauthorized Immigrant workers. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
12.
DélanoAlexandra. 2009. “From Limited to Active Engagement: Mexico’s Emigration Policies from a Foreign Policy Perspective (2000-2006).” International Migration Review43 (4): 764-814.
13.
DélanoAlexandra. 2018. From Here and There: Diaspora Policies, Integration, and Social Rights beyond Borders. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
DélanoAlexandraGamlenAlan. 2014. “Comparing and Theorizing State-Diaspora Relations.”Political Geography41:43-53.
15.
FussellElizabeth. 2011. “The Deportation Threat Dynamic and Victimization of Latino Migrants: Wage Theft and Robbery.”The Sociological Quarterly52 (4): 593-615.
GleesonShannon. 2012. Conflicting Commitments: The Politics of Enforcing Immigrant Worker Rights in San Jose and Houston. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
GleesonShannon. 2016. Precarious Claims the Promise and Failure of Workplace Protections in the United States. Oakland: University of California Press.
19.
GriffithDavid C.2005. “Rural Industry and Mexican Immigration and Settlement in North Carolina.” In New Destinations: Mexican Immigration in the United States, edited by ZúñigaVictorHernández-LeónRuben, 50-75. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
GriffithKati L.GleesonShannon M.2018. “The Precarity of Temporality: How Law Inhibits Immigrant Worker Claims.”Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal39 (1): 111-241.
21.
HaganJacqueline MariaEschbachKarlRodriguezNestor. 2008. “U.S. Deportation Policy, Family Separation, and Circular Migration.”International Migration Review42 (1): 64-88.
22.
HaganJacqueline MariaMartinez-SchuldtRicardoPeaveyAlyssaWeissmanDeborah M.2018. “Family Matters: Claiming Citizenship Rights across the U.S.-Mexico Migratory System.”Journal on Migration and Human Security6 (2): 167-80.
23.
JiMinWoongWeilDavid. 2010. Does Ownership Structure Influence Regulatory Behavior? The Impact of Franchisee Free-Riding on Labor Standards Compliance. Boston: Boston University.
24.
LaglagaronLaureen. 2010. “Protection Through Integration: An Overview of Mexican Government Efforts to Build the Social and Human Capital of its Migrants in the United States.” Report, Migration Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
25.
LevittPeggyde la DehesaRafael. 2003. “Transnational Migration and the Redefinition of the State: Variations and Explanations.”Ethnic and Racial Studies26 (4): 587-611.
26.
Martínez-SchuldtRicardo D.2020. “Mexican Consular Protection Services across the United States: How Local, Social, Economic, and Political Conditions Structure the Socio-legal Support of Emigrants.”International Migration Review54 (5): 1016-44.
27.
MasseyDouglas S.DurandJorgeMaloneNolan J. (2002) 2003. Beyond Smoke and Mirrors Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
McGarityThomasSteinzorRenaShapiroSidneyShudtzMathew. 2010. “Workers at Risk: Regulatory Dysfunction at OSHA.” Report, Center for Progressive Reform, Washington, DC.
29.
MeissnerDorisKerwinDonald M.ChrishtiMuzaffarBergeronClaire. 2013. “Immigration Enforcement in the United States: The Rise of a Formidable Machinery.” Report, Migration Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
30.
MossKathrynUllmanMichael DarrenSwansonJeffery W.RanneyLeah M.BurrisScott. 2005. “Prevalence and Outcomes of ADA Employment Discrimination Claims in the Federal Courts.”Mental & Physical Disability Law Reporter29:303-25.
31.
OrreniusPia M.ZavodnyMadeline. 2009. “Do Immigrants Work in Riskier Jobs?”Demography46 (3): 535-51.
32.
PedrozaLuicyPalop-GarcíaPau. 2017. “Diaspora Policies in Comparison: An Application of the Emigrant Policies Index (EMIX) for Latin American and Caribbean Region.”Political Geography60:165-78.
33.
PedrozaLuicy. 2020. Citizenship Beyond Nationality Immigrants’ Right to Vote Across the World. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
34.
PioreMichael J.SeanSafford. 2006. “Changing Regimes of Workplace Governance Shifting Axes of Social Mobilization, and the Challenge to Industrial Relations Theory.”Industrial Relations45 (3): 299-325.
35.
RugglesStevenGenadekKatieGoekenRonaldGroverJosiahSobekMatthew. 2015. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 6.0 [Dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
36.
StuartForrestArmentaAmadaOsbornMelissa. 2015. “Legal Control of Marginal Groups.”Annual Review of Law and Social Science11:235-54.
37.
TrautnerMary NellHattonErinSmithKelly E.2013. “What Workers Want Depends: Legal Knowledge and the Desire for Workplace Change among Day Laborers.”Law & Policy35 (4): 319-40.
38.
U.S. Department of Labor. 2011. “H-2A Temporary Agricultural Visa Program FY 2011 Select Statistics.” Report, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.
39.
ValenzuelaAbelJr. 2003. “Day-Labor Work.”Annual Review of Sociology7 (4): 78-102.
40.
WaldingerRoger. 2015. The Cross-Border Connection Immigrants, Emigrants, and Their Homelands. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
41.
WeissmanDeborah M.HaganJacquelineMartinez-SchuldtRicardoPeaveyAlyssa. 2018. “The Politics of Immigrant Rights: Between Geography Transnational Interventions.”Michigan State Law Review1:117-87.
42.
ZatzNoah. 2008. “Working Beyond the Reach or Grasp of Employment Law.” In The Gloves-off Economy: Workplace Standards at the Bottom of America’s Labor Market, edited by BernhardtAnnetteBousheyHeatherDresserLauraTillyChris, 31-64. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
