The passage of Right to Work (RTW) legislation in Michigan was a surprise to many, given its relatively high unionization rate. Previous studies that examine state RTW status and the process of passing RTW legislation are not a good fit for the events in Michigan. Instead, single-party Republican control of state government and a wealthy donor who prioritized RTW combined to introduce legislation, pass it, and sign it into law in a one-week period. Contextual factors helped create an opportunity for this campaign to succeed. The Michigan experience raises questions about long-term strategies for labor in similar environments in the era of big-money donors.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.”American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 327-48.
DaveyMonica. 2014. “Campaigning to Extend, or End, One-Party Rule.”New York Times, October31. http://nyti.ms/1wP0z1W.
10.
DavisScottSteeleJeremy W.2009. “Granholm Plan Cuts $670M, Including $164M in School Aid, 1,500 State Layoffs, $28M in Wage Concessions.”Lansing State Journal, February13, A1.
11.
DixonMarc. 2008. “Movements, Countermovements and Policy Adoption: The Case of Right-to-Work Activism.”Social Forces87 (1): 473-500.
Institute for Public Policy and Social Research. 2013. “State of the State Survey-64.”Winter. Michigan State University, East Lansing. http://www.ippsr.msu.edu/SOSS.
19.
JacobsDavidDixonMarc. 2006. “The Politics of Labor-Management Relations: Detecting the Conditions That Affect Changes in Right-to-Work Laws.”Social Problems53 (1): 118-37. doi:10.1525/sp.2006.53.1.118.
20.
KrollAndy. 2014. “All the Right Moves.”Mother Jones39 (1): 18-25.
