This article offers a pedagogical model for facilitating union worker–university student dialogues on labor issues. Most university students in this study initially held neutral opinions of organized labor. However, the beliefs of the few students with strong attitudes about unions were often shaped by close interactions with family members who belonged to unions. Taking these attitudes and factors into considerations when designing classroom activities and approaches, a dialoguing process was developed that encouraged participants to articulate their viewpoints, engage in reciprocal written and verbal exchanges, and reflect on others’ perceptions in order to enhance their own labor perspectives.
AllmanPaula. 2009. “Paulo Freire’s Contribution to Radical Adult Education.” In The Critical Pedagogy Reader, 2nd ed., edited by DarderAntoniaBaltodanoMarta P.TorresRodolfo D. (New York: Routledge), 417-30.
AronowitzStanley. 1990. “The New Labor Education: A Return to Ideology.” In The Re- education of the American Working Class, edited by LondonStevenTarrE.WilsonJ. (New York: Greenwood Press), 21-34.
5.
BacaJimmy SantiagoJamesStacy, eds. 2003. The Heat: Steelworker Lives and Legends. San Diego, CA: Cedar Hill.
6.
BaconDavid. 2004. The Children of NAFTA: Labor Wars on the U.S./Mexico Border. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
7.
BarlingJulianKellowayE. KevinBremermannEric H. 1991. “Preemployment Predictors of Union Attitudes: The Role of Family Socialization and Work Beliefs.” Journal of Applied Psychology76:725-31.
8.
BarrettJimKoenkerDiane P. 2008. “The Saga of History 492: The Transformation of Working-Class History in One Classroom.” Labour/Le Travail61:181-213.
9.
Barron’s. 2010. Profiles of American Colleges 2011. Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Services.
10.
BerlinJames. 1988. “Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class.” College English50:477-95.
11.
BernardElaine. 2002. “Popular Education: Training Rebels with a Cause.” In Teaching for Change: Popular Education and the Labor Movement, edited by DelpLindaOutman-KramerMirandaSchurmanSusan J.WongKent (Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Labor Research and Education), 6-8.
12.
BusselRobert. 2002. “Fostering Critical Thinking about Contemporary Social and Political Issues: A Labor Education Experiment.” Labor Studies Journal27:85-89.
13.
California Federation of Teachers Labor in the Schools Committee and UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education. 2002. “Bringing Labor into the Classroom.” http://www.cft.org/about/comm/labor/rguide.html.
14.
ChristopherRenny. 1999. “Teaching Working-Class Literature to Mixed Audiences.” In Teaching Working Class, edited by LinkonSherry Lee (Boston: University of Massachusetts Press), 203-22.
15.
DarderAntoniaBaltodonaMartaTorresRodolfo D. 2003. The Critical Pedagogy Reader. New York: Routledge.
16.
DelloroJohn. 2008. “‘Educate to Organize’: Reflections on Building the Dolores Huerta Labor Institute.” Radical History Review102:18-22.
García MárquezGabriel. 2006. One Hundred Years of Solitude. New York: Harper Perennial.
22.
GlassFred. 2008. “The Ongoing Need for Strong Unions: A Primer for Your Students.” American Educator32:35-37.
23.
GreenJames. 2008. “Why Teach Labor History?” American Educator32:30-34.
24.
HertensteinEdward. 1999. “Distance Learning in Labor Education.” Labor Studies Journal23:3-16.
25.
KellowayE. KevinBarlingJulianAgarSharon. 1996. “Preemployment Predictors of Children’s Union Attitudes: The Moderating Role of Identification with Parents.” Journal of Social Psychology136:413-15.
26.
KellowayE. KevinWattsLaura. 1994. “Preemployment Predictors of Union Attitudes: Replication and Extension.” Journal of Applied Psychology79:631-634.
27.
LaHuisDavid M.MellorSteven. 2001. “Antiunion and Prounion Attitudes as Predictors of College Students’ Willingness to Join a Union.” Journal of Psychology135:661-81.
28.
LinkonSherry Lee. 1999. Teaching Working Class. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.
29.
LinnéRob. 2009a. “Introduction.” In Organizing the Curriculum: Perspectives on Teaching the US Labor Movement, edited by LinnéRobBeninLeighSosinAdrienne Andi (New York: Sense Publishers), xi-xix.
30.
LinnéRob. 2009b. “Labor’s Exclusion from Official Knowledge.” In Organizing the Curriculum: Perspectives on Teaching the US Labor Movement, edited by LinnéRobBeninLeighSosinAdrienne Andi (New York: Sense Publishers), 19-40.
31.
LinnéRobSosinAdrienne AndiBeninLeigh. 2009. “Teaching Labor’s Untold Story: How to Get Labor Back into the Classroom.” New Labor Forum18:85-94.
32.
LinnéRobBeninLeighSosinAdrienne Andi, eds. 2009. Organizing the Curriculum: Perspectives on Teaching the US Labor Movement. New York: Sense Publishers.
LouieMiriam Ching Yoon. 2006. Sweatshop Warriors: Immigrant Women Workers Take On the Global Factory. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
35.
LoweGraham S.RastinSandra. 2000. “Organizing the Next Generation: Influences on Young Workers’ Willingness to Join Unions in Canada.” British Journal of Industrial Relations38:203-22.
36.
MantsiosGregory. 1990. “Worker Education: Developing an Approach to Worker Empowerment.” In The Re-education of the American Working Class, edited by LondonStevenTarrE.WilsonJ. (New York: Greenwood Press), 35-50.
37.
McLarenPeter. 2000. Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the Pedagogy of Revolution. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
38.
McLarenPeterFarahmandpurRamin. 2005. Teaching against Global Capitalism and the New Imperialism. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
39.
NerudaPablo. 1991. “United Fruit Co.” In Canto General (Los Angeles: University of California Press), 179.
40.
PesekJames G.RaehslerRod D.BaloughRobert S. 2006. “Future Professionals and Managers: Their Attitudes toward Unions, Organizational Beliefs, and Work Ethic.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology36:1569-94.
RussellDavid R. 1997. “Rethinking Genre in School and Society: An Activity Theory Analysis.” Written Communication14:504-54.
44.
RussoJohnLinkonSherry Lee, eds. 2005. New Working Class Studies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45.
SawchukPeter H. 2006. “Labor Education and Labor Art: The Hidden Potential of Knowing for the Left Hand.” Labor Studies Journal31:49-68.
46.
SeitzDavid. 2004. “Making Work Visible.” College English67:210-21.
47.
SnegroffCourtneyBeninLeigh David. 2009. “A Letter for Family and Friends from the Labor Front.” In Organizing the Curriculum: Perspectives on Teaching the American Labor Movement, edited by LinnéRobBeninLeighSosinAdrienne Andi (New York: Sense Publishers), 41-61.
48.
SosinAdrienne Andi. 2009. “Where Do We Go from Here?” In Organizing the Curriculum: Perspectives on Teaching the American Labor Movement, edited by LinnéRobBeninLeighSosinAdrienne Andi (New York: Sense Publishers), 267-73.
49.
TubachLinda. 2002. “Labor in Schools.” In Teaching for Change: Popular Education and the Labor Movement, edited by DelpLindaOutman-KramerMirandaSchurmanSusan J.WongKent (Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Labor Research and Education), 198-203.
van OersBertWardekkerWimElbersEdder VeerRene can, eds. 2008. The Transformations of Learning: Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
ViramontesHelena Maria. 1996. Under the Feet of Jesus. New York: Penguin.
53.
WilloughbyFloyd G.BarclayLizbeth F. 1986. “College Students’ Majors and Attitudes toward Unions: Sources of Future Union Members?” Journal of Collective Negotiations15:223-30.
54.
WilloughbyFloyd G.KeonThomas L. 1985. “Changing Business Students’ Attitudes toward Unions: A Significant Treatment Effect.” Journal of Collective Negotiations14: 231-38.
55.
WorthenHelena. 2008. “Using Activity Theory to Understand How People Learn to Negotiate the Conditions of Work.” Mind, Culture and Activity15:322-38.
56.
ZulloRolandGatesAlice. 2008. “Labor Education in the Time of Dismay.” Labor Studies Journal33:179-202.
