ACIR. See U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
2.
AgranoffRobert. 1986. Intergovernmental management: Human services problem solving in six metropolitan areas. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3.
AgranoffRobertPattakosAlex N.. 1985. Local government human services. Baseline Data Report17: 1–20.
4.
BartikTimothy J.1991. Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute of Employment Research.
BreakGeorge F.1980. Financing the federal system. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
7.
CiglerBeverly. 1995. Not just another special interest: Intergovernmental representation. In Interest group politics, 4th ed.CiglerAllan J.LoomisBurdett A., eds. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
8.
CiglerBeverly. 1996. Adjusting to changing expectations at the local level. In Handbook of public administration, 2d ed., 60–76.PerryJames L., ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
ClarkeSusan E.GaileGary L.. 1989. Moving toward entrepreneurial economic development policies: Opportunities and barriers. Policy Studies Journal17: 575–98.
10.
ClarkeSusan E.GaileGary L.. 1992. The next wave: Postfederal local economic development strategies. Economic Development Quarterly6: 187–98.
11.
ClarkeSusan E.SaizMartin R.. 1996. Economic development and infrastructure policy. In Politics in the American states.VirginiaGrayHerbertJacob, eds. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
12.
EisingerPeter K.1988. The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
ElazarDaniel J.1962. The American partnership: Intergovernmental cooperation in the nineteenth century United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
ElazarDaniel J.1984. American federalism: A view from the states, 3d ed.New York: Harper & Row.
15.
FeiockRichard C.ClingermayerJames C.. 1992. Development policy choice: Four explanations for city implementation of economic development policies. American Review of Public Administration22: 49–63.
16.
FleischmannArnoldGreenGary P.. 1991. Organizing local agencies to promote economic development. American Review of Public Administration21: 1–15.
17.
FleischmannArnoldGreenGary P.Man KwongTsz. 1992. What's a city to do? Explaining differences in local economic development policies. Western Political Quarterly45: 677–99.
18.
FoslerR. Scott. 1988. The new economic role of states. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
FoslerR. Scott, ed. 1991. Local economic development: Strategies for a changing economy. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association.
20.
FoslerR. Scott. 1992. State economic policy: The emerging paradigm. Economic Development Quarterly6: 3–13.
IngramHelen. 1977. Policy implementation through bargaining: The case of federal grants-in-aid. Public Policy25 (Fall): 499–526.
23.
LevyJohn. 1990. What economic developers actually do: Location quotients versus press releases. Journal of the American Planning Association56: 153–60.
24.
LiebschutzSarah F.1991. Bargaining under federalism: Contemporary New York. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25.
LukeJeffrey S.VentrissCurtisReedB.J.ReedChristine M.. 1988. Managing economic development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
NewlandChester A.1996. The national government in transition. In Handbook of public administration, 2d ed., 19–35.PerryJames L., ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
O'TooleLaurence J.1997a. The implications for democracy in a networked bureaucratic world. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory7: 443–59.
28.
O'TooleLaurence J.1997b. Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review57: 45–52.
29.
PressmanJeffrey L.1975. Federal programs and city politics: The dynamics of the aid process in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
RadinBeryl A.AgranoffRobertBowmanAnn O' M.BuntzGregory C.OttSteven J.RomzekBarbara S.WilsonRobert H.. 1996. New governance for rural America: Creating intergovernmental partnerships. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
31.
ReeseLaura A.1994. The role of counties in local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly8: 28–42.
32.
RichterArthur J.1976. Federal grants management: The city and county view. Urban Data Service8: 1–13.
33.
StenbergCarl W.1996. Engines of change: Leading from the states. In Handbook of public administration, 2d ed., 36–59.PerryJames L., ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Study Committee on Policy Management Assistance. 1975. Executive summary. Public Administration Review35: 700–705.
35.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1977. Improving federal grants management. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
36.
WalkerDavid B.1995. The rebirth of federalism: Slouching toward Washington. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.
37.
WilsonRoger. 1991. State business incentives and economic growth: Are they effective?Washington, D.C.: The Council of State Governments.
38.
WolmanHaroldSpitzleyDavid. 1996. The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly10: 115–50.
39.
WrightDeil S.1988. Understanding intergovernmental relations, 3d ed.Belmont, Calif.: Wads-worth.