AldrichJohn H.NelsonForrest D.. 1984. Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Sage university papers series. Qualitative applications in the social sciences, no. 07–045. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
2.
AllisonPaul D.1984. Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Sage university papers series. Qualitative applications in the social sciences, no. 07–046. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
3.
BerkovitzDan M.1987. Waste wars: Did Congress “nuke” state sovereignty in the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985?Harvard Environmental Law Review11: 437–90.
4.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.. 1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review84: 395–415.
5.
BowmanAnn O'M.KearneyRichard C.. 1988. Dimensions of state government capability. Western Political Quarterly41: 341–62.
6.
diZeregaGus. 1991. Integrating quantum theory with post-modern political thought and action: The priority of relationships over objects. In Quantum politics: Applying quantum theory to political phenomena.BeckerTheodore L., ed. New York: Praeger.
7.
ElmoreRichard F.1987. Instruments and strategy in public policy. Policy Studies Review7: 174–86.
8.
KearneyRichard C.1993. Low-level radioactive waste management: Environmental policy, federalism, and New York. Publius23: 57–73.
9.
KearneyRichard C.SmithAnde A.. 1994. The low-level radioactive waste siting process in Connecticut: Anatomy of a failure. Policy Studies Journal22: 617–30.
10.
KearneyRichard C.StuckerJohn J.. 1985. Interstate compacts and the management of low level radioactive wastes. Public Administration Review45: 210–20.
11.
LinderStephen P.Guy PetersB.. 1989. Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy9: 35–58.
12.
LowryWilliam R.1992. The dimensions of federalism: State governments and pollution control policies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
13.
MohrLawrence B.1969. Determinants of innovation in organizations. The American Political Science Review3: 111–26.
NiceDavid C.1987. State participation in interstate compacts. Publius17: 69–83.
16.
OTA. See U.S. Office of Technology Assessment.
17.
RabeBarry G.1994. Beyond NIMBY: Hazardous waste siting in Canada and the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
18.
SalamonLesterLundMichael. 1989. Beyond privatization: The tools of government action. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.
19.
SavageRobert L.1985. Diffusion research traditions and the spread of policy innovations in a federal system. Publius15: 1–27.
20.
SchneiderAnneIngramHelen. 1990. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics52: 510–29.
21.
U.S. House. 1979. Committee on Science and Technology. Subcommittee on Energy Research and Production. Low-level nuclear waste burial grounds. 96th Cong., 1st sess. November 7. Y4. Sci 2 96/80.
22.
U.S. House and Senate. 1985. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development; Committee on Environment and Public Works. Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation. Low-level radioactive waste disposal. 99th Cong., 1st sess. October 8. Y4. En2: S. Hrg. 99–349.
23.
U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1989. Partnerships under pressure: Managing commercial low-level radioactive waste. OTA-O-426. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
24.
U.S. Senate. 1983. Committee on the Judiciary. Status of interstate compacts for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste. 98th Cong., 1st sess. March 2. Y4. J89/2: S. Hrg. 98–331.
25.
Van HornCarl E.1989. The state of the states. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.