AbramsKathleen S.LyonsWilliam. 1987. Impact of correctional facilities on land values and public safety. North Miami, Fla.: Florida Atlantic University/Florida International University Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems. National Institute of Corrections Grant #R-84-P-02.
2.
CarlsonKatherine A.1988. Understanding community opposition to prison siting: More than fear and finances. Corrections Today (April): 84–90.
3.
CarlsonKatherine A.1990a. Prison escapes and community consequences: Results of a case study. Federal Probation54 (June): 36–42.
4.
CarlsonKatherine A.1990b. Prison impacts: A review of the research. Unpublished report. National Institute of Justice Grant #85-IJ-CX-0022.
5.
CarlsonKatherine A.1990c. What happens and what counts: Resident assessments of prison impacts on their communities. Unpublished report. National Institute of Justice Grant #85-IJ-CX-0022.
6.
EnglandJ. LynnAlbrechtStan L.. 1984. Boom-towns and social disruption. Rural Sociology49, no. 31: 230–46.
7.
HawesJerry A.1985. Cities with prisons: Do they have higher or lower crime rates?Sacramento, Calif.: State Senate Office of Research.
8.
KrauseJerrald D.1991. Community opposition to correctional facility siting: Beyond the “NIMBY” explanation. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations17, nos. 1 and 2: 239–62.
9.
LidmanRussell M.1988. Impact of Washington state's correctional institutions on communities. Olympia, Wash.: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
10.
RayMelvin C.RobertsonCraig T.. 1994. Siting correctional facilities: Toward a functional explanation of public attitudes. Paper prepared for presentation at annual meeting of the Southern Criminal Justice Association, Memphis, October 5–8.
11.
ShichorDavid. 1992. Myths and realities in prison siting. Crime and Delinquency38 (June): 70–87.
12.
SmyklaJohn O.ChengDavid C.GergusonCarl E.Jr.TrentCarolynTrenchBarbaraWatersAnnette. 1984. Effects of a prison facility on the regional economy. Journal of Criminal Justice12, no. 31: 521–39.
13.
SwansonCheryl. 1993. Citizens' perceptions of prison effects on their community. State and Local Government Review25, no. 2 (Spring): 107–16.