BaratzJoanJayMoskowitz. 1978. Proposition 13: How and why it happened. Phi Delta Kappan60: 9–11.
2.
BerryFrancis StokesWilliamBerry. 1992. Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political opportunity. American Journal of Political Science36, no. 31: 715–42.
3.
BurrupPercy E.VernBrimleyJr.1982. Financing education in a climate of change, 3d ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
Council of State Governments (CSG). 1973. The book of the states. Lexington, Ky.: CSG.
5.
FilerJohn E.MoakDonald L.BarryUze. 1988. Why some states adopt lotteries and others don't. Public Finance Quarterly16, no. 31: 259–83.
6.
FuhrmanSusan. 1982. State-level politics and school financing. In Changing politics of school finance.Cambron-McCabeNelda H.OddenAllan, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
7.
JonesThomasJohnAmalfitano. 1994. Public school finance and state lotteries. Lancaster, Pa.: Technomic.
8.
KmentaJan. 1986. Elements of econometrics, 2d ed.New York: Macmillan.
9.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.1979. Some economic effects of revolution: Models, measurement, and the Cuban evidence. American Journal of Sociology84, no. 31: 1127–49.
10.
McDowellDavidMcClearyRichardMeidingerErrol E.HayRichard A.Jr.1980. Interrupted time series analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
11.
MikesellJohn L.1995. Fiscal administration: Analysis and applications for the public sector, 4th ed.Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
12.
OstromCharles W.Jr.1978. Time series analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
13.
PiercePatrick A.MillerDonald E.. 1995. Variations in the politics of state lottery adoptions. Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, Ind. Duplicated.
14.
PiercePatrick A.MillerDonald E.. 1996. The impact of state lotteries on state fiscal politics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, March 14–16.
15.
PressmanJeffreyWildavskyAaron B.. 1984. Implementation, 3d ed.Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
SearsDavid O.JackCitrin. 1982. Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
17.
SmithMark A.1995. Time serial designs and cross-sectional designs: Uncovering the structural logic of pooled analyses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 31-September 2.
18.
StimsonJames A.1985. Regression in time and space: A statistical essay. American Journal of Political Science29, no. 31: 914–47.
19.
TompkinsSusanne. 1981. Proposition 21/2—Massachusetts and the tax revolt. The Journal of the Institute for Socioeconomic Studies6: 21–32.
20.
TvedtSherry. 1981. Enough is enough: Proposition 21/2 in Massachusetts. National Civic Review70: 52733.
21.
PresidentU.S.. 1994. Economic report of the President transmitted to Congress. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
22.
WilliamsMary Frase. 1982. Earthquakes or tremors? Tax and expenditure limitations and school finance. In Changing politics of school finance.Cambron-McCabeNelda H.OddenAllan, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
23.
WinnBeth MoncureMarciaLynn Whicker. 1989-90. Indicators of state lottery adoptions. Policy Studies Journal18, no. 31: 293–304.