Americans’ evaluations of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are well-documented by polling and survey outlets. However, evaluations of state environmental agencies are not routinely measured. Understanding Americans’ evaluations of these agencies is important because agencies rely on funding and support from elected officials who pay close attention to opinions in the public. Negative evaluations can lead to the inability to pursue assigned mandate(s). In this article, I use unique survey data to explore factors that shape opinion of state environmental agencies. I find that, even when accounting for partisanship, impressions of environmental quality and trust in state bureaucratic institutions shape opinions.
AndersonChristopher J.2000. “Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies19 (2): 151–70.
2.
AnsonIan G.Kane.John V.2023. “Ought it Audit? Information, Values, and Public Support for the Internal Revenue Service.” Journal of Experimental Political Science10:209–20.
3.
BachnerJenniferGinsbergBenjamin. 2021. America’s State Governments: A Critical Look at Disconnected Democracies. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BartelsLarry M.2002. “Beyond the Running Talley: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior24 (2): 731–45.
5.
BisgaardMartin. 2015. “Bias Will Find a Way: Economic Perceptions, Attributions of Blame, and Partisan-Motivated Reasoning during Crisis.” The Journal of Politics77 (3): 849–60.
6.
BlendonR. J.Benson.J. M.2001. “Americans’ Views on Health Policy: A Fifty-Year Historical Perspective.” Health Affairs20:33–46.
7.
CampbellAngusConversePhillip E.MillerWarren E.Stokes.Donald E.1960. The American Voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
8.
CarpenterDaniel. 2010. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
CarverVivienReinertBonitaRangeLillian M.CampbellCatherineBoydNicole. 2003. “Nonprofit Organizations versus Government Agencies to Reduce Tobacco Use.” Journal of Public Health Policy24 (2): 181–94.
10.
DarmofalDavid. 2005. “Elite Cues and Citizen Disagreement with Expert Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly58 (3): 381–95.
11.
EvansGeoffreyAndersenRobert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” American Journal of Political Science68 (1): 194–207.
12.
FishelJeff. 1985. Presidents and Promises: From Campaign Pledge to Presidential Performance. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
GarrettR. SamThurberJames A.Lee FritschlerA.Rosenbloom.David H.2006. “Assessing the Impact of Bureaucracy Bashing by Electoral Campaigns.” Public Administration Review66 (2): 228–40.
15.
GravesPhilip. 2003. “Environmental Perceptions and Environmental Reality: When More is Less?”Environment and Planning A35:951–57.
16.
HallThad E.2002. “Live Bureaucrats and Dead Public Servants: How People in Government are Discussed on the Floor of the House.” Public Administration Review62 (2): 242–51.
17.
HellwigTimothy T.SamuelsDavid. 2008. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science38 (1): 65–90.
18.
HibbingJohn R.Theiss-MorseElizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HopperJoyAnna. 2017. “The Regulation of Combination: The Implications of Combining Natural Resource Conservation and Environmental Protection.” SPPQ17 (1):105–24.
20.
HopperJoyAnna. 2020. Environmental Agencies in the United States: The Enduring Power of Organizational Design and State Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield: Lexington Books.
KimS. E.2005. “The Role of Trust in the Modern Administrative State: An Integrative Model.” Administration and Society37 (5): 611–35.
23.
KoniskyDavid M.2008. “Regulator Attitudes and the Environmental Race to the Bottom Argument.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18 (2): 321–44.
24.
KoniskyDavid M.Woods.Neal D.2012. “Measuring State Environmental Policy.” Review of Policy Research29 (4): 544–69.
25.
KoontzThomas M.2002. Federalism in the Forest: National versus State Natural Resource Policy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
26.
LeviM.1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LyonsJeffreyJaegarWilliam P.WolakJennifer. 2013. “The Roots of Citizens’ Knowledge of State Politics.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly13 (2): 183–202.
28.
MalhortaN.KuoA.. 2008. “Attributing Blame: The Public’s Response to Hurricane Katrina.” Journal of Politics70 (1): 120–35.
29.
McCrightAaron M.Dunlap.Riley E.2011. “The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001-2010.” The Sociological Quarterly52 (2): 155–94.
30.
MeierKenneth J.BohteJohn. 2006. Politics and the Bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government. 5th ed.Boston: Cengage Learning.
31.
Parker-StephenEvan. 2013. “Tides of Disagreement: How Reality Facilitates (and Inhibits) Partisan Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics75 (4):1077–88.
32.
PowellG. BinghamWhittenGuy. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science37 (2): 391–414.
33.
RogowskiJon C.2020. “The Administrative Presidency and Public Trust in the Bureaucracy.” Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy1:27–51.
RuanHaiboQiuLiChenJunLiuShuoMaZhiyuan. 2022. “Government Trust, Environmental Pollution Perception, and Environmental Governance Satisfaction.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19:1–18.
36.
RuostetsaariIlkka. 2010. “Citizens, Politicians, and Experts in Energy Policy-making: The Case of Finland.” Energy & Environment21 (3): 203–22.
37.
ShakerLee. 2012. “Local Political Knowledge and Assessments of Citizen Competence.” The Public Opinion Quarterly76 (3): 525–37.
38.
ShawGreg M.ShapiroRobert Y.LockShmuelJacobsLawrence R.. 1988. “Trends: Crime, the Police, and Civil Liberties.” The Public Opinion Quarterly62 (3): 405–26.
39.
SongerDonald R.1984. “Government Closest to the People: Constituent Knowledge in State and National Politics.” Polity17 (2): 387–95.
40.
TilleyJamesHobolt.Sarah B.2011. “Is the Government to Blame? An Experimental Test of How Partisanship Shapes Perceptions of Performance and Responsibility.” The Journal of Politics73 (2): 316–30.
41.
TylerT.R.2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42.
Van de WalleStevenKampenJarl K.BouckaertGeert. 2005. “Deep Impact for High-Impact Agencies? Assessing the Role of Bureaucratic Encounters in Evaluations of Government.” Public Performance & Management Review28 (4): 532–49.
43.
Web YackeeSusanLoweryDavid. 2005. “Understanding Public Support for the US Federal Bureaucracy.” Public Management Review7 (4): 515–36.
44.
WeinschenkAaron C.Helpap.David J.2015. “Political Trust in the American States.” State and Local Government Review47 (1): 26–34.
WlezienChristopherFranklinMarkTwiggsDaniel. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity.” Political Behavior19 (1): 7–17.
47.
WolakJennifer. 2020. “Why do People Trust their State Government?” State Politics & Policy Quarterly20 (3): 313–29.
48.
WolakJenniferKelleher PalusChristine. 2010. “The Dynamics of Public Confidence in U.S. State and Local Government.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly10 (4): 421–45.
49.
WooldridgeJ. M.2009. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 4th ed.Boston: South-Western.
50.
YatesD.1982. Bureaucratic Democracy: The Search for Democracy and Efficiency in American Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
