The authors examine whether there are geographic biases in public administration research. They use a dataset of 557 research articles from top public administration journals in which specific state names appear in the title or abstract. Findings suggest that not only is a mass of public administration research concentrated in four states (Florida, California, New York, and Texas), but specific thematic topics and policy areas are associated with each of those states. In general, this suggests that authors need to consider if continuing these trends creates a blind spot for research bias in the field, where the collective understanding of a specific topic is disproportionately influenced by data from a single state. The broad implications are that how states serve as a research setting should be actively considered by authors.
AbramoG.D’AngeloC. A.Di CostaF.. 2020. “Knowledge Spillovers: Does the Geographic Proximity Effect Decay Over Time? A Discipline-Level Analysis, Accounting for Cognitive Proximity, With and Without Self-Citations.” Journal of Informetrics14 (4): 101072. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101072
2.
AdamsW. C.InfeldD. L.MinnichelliL. F.RuddellM. W.. 2014. “Policy Journal Trends and Tensions: JPAM and PSJ.” Policy Studies Journal42 (s1): s118–37. doi:10.1111/psj.12051
3.
BaileyM. T.1991. “Do Physicists Use Case Studies? Thoughts on Public Administration Research.” Public Administration Review52 (1): 47–54. doi:10.2307/976545
4.
BeeryF. S.BerryW. D.. 2018. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by WeibleC. M.SabatierP. A.. New York: Routledge, 253–300.
5.
BraceP.JewettA.. 1995. “The State of State Politics Research.” Political Research Quarterly48 (3): 643–81. doi:10.1177/106591299504800310
6.
BrewerG. A.DouglasJ. W.FacerR. L.O’TooleL. J.. 1999. “Determinants of Graduate Research Productivity in Doctoral Programs of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review59 (5): 373–82. doi:10.2307/977421
DionM. L.SumnerJ. L.MitchellS. M.. 2018. “Gendered Citation Patterns Across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields.” Political Analysis26 (3): 312–27. doi:10.1017/pan.2018.12
9.
FitzpatrickJ.GogginM.HeikkilaT.KlingnerD.MachadoJ.MartellC.. 2011. “A New Look at Comparative Public Administration: Trends in Research and an Agenda for the Future.” Public Administration Review71 (6): 821–30. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02432.x
10.
FontanaM.MontobbioF.RaccaP.. 2019. “Topics and Geographical Diffusion of Knowledge in Top Economic Journals.” Economic Inquiry57 (4): 1771–97. doi:10.1111/ecin.12815
11.
FryB. R.RaadscheldersJ. C. N.. 2013. Mastering Public Administration. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
JensenJ. L.RodgersR.. 2001. “Cumulating the Intellectual Gold of Case Study Research.” Public Administration Review61 (2): 235–46. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00025
13.
KapucuK.HuQ.KhosaS.. 2017. “The State of Network Research in Public Administration.” Administration & Society49 (8): 1087–120. doi:10.1177/0095399714555752
14.
McGuireM.2006. “Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It.” Public Administration Review66 (s1): 33–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x
15.
MeijaardE.CardilloM.MeijaardE. M.PossinghamH. P.. 2015. “Geographic Bias in Citation Rates of Conservation Research.” Conservation Biology29 (3): 920–5. doi:10.1111/cobi.12489
16.
MetzT.JackleS.. 2017. “Patterns of Publishing in Political Science Journals: An Overview of Our Profession Using Bibliographic Data and a Co-Authorship Network.” PS: Political Science & Politics50 (1): 157–65. doi:10.1017/S1049096516002341
17.
NieM.2004. “State Wildlife Policy and Management: The Scope and Bias of Political Conflict.” Public Administration Review64 (2): 221–33. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00363.x
18.
O’TooleL. J.2015. “Networks and Networking: The Public Administrative Agendas.” Public Administration Review75 (3): 361–71. doi:10.1111/puar.12281
19.
PoisterT. H.ThomasJ. C.. 2011. “The Effect of Expectations and Expectancy Confirmation/Disconfirmation on Motorist’ Satisfaction with State Highways.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory21 (4): 601–17. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur004
RaadscheldersJ.2011. “The Future of the Study of Public Administration: Embedding Research Objects and Methodology in Epistemology and Ontology.” Public Administration Review71 (6): 916–24. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02433.x
22.
RaadscheldersJ.LeeK.. 2011. “Trends in the Study of Public Administration: Empirical and Qualitative Observations from Public Administration Review, 2000–2009.” Public Administration Review71 (1): 19–33. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02303.x
23.
RaadscheldersJ.WhetsellT.DimandA.KieningerK.. 2018. “Journal of Public Affairs Education at 25: Topics, Trends, and Authors.” Journal of Public Affairs Education25 (1): 51–72. doi:10.1080/15236803.2018.1546506
24.
ReeseL. A.LindenburgK. E.. 2002. “Assessing Local Government Sexual Harassment Policies.” American Review of Public Administration32 (3): 295–311. doi:10.1177/0275074002323002
25.
ReichG.BarthJ.. 2010. “Educating Citizens or Defying Federal Authority? A Comparative Study of In-State Tuition for Undocumented Students.” Policy Studies Journal38 (3): 419–45. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00368.x
26.
SkopecM.IssaH.ReedJ.HarrisM.. 2020. “The Role of Geographic Bias in Knowledge Diffusion: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.” Research Integrity & Peer Review5 (2).
WoodsN. D.2021. “The State of State Environmental Policy Research: A Thirty-Year Progress Report.” Review of Policy Research38 (3): 347–69. doi:10.1111/ropr.12426
29.
WuestmanM. L.HoekmanJ.FrenkenK.. 2019. “The Geography of Scientific Citations.” Research Policy48 (7): 1771–80. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.004
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
