Performance Management Research for State and Local Government: Where It Should Go Next

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ammons

David N.

2020. Performance Measurement for Managing Local Government: Getting It Right. Irvine, CA: Melvin & Leigh.

Ammons

David N.

Liston

Ellen G.

Jones

Jordan A.

. 2013. Performance Management Purpose, Executive Engagement, and Reported Benefits among Leading Local Governments. State and Local Government Review 45 (3): 172–9. DOI: 10.1177/0160323X13498261.

Ammons

David N.

Roenigk

Dale J.

. 2015. Performance Management in Local Government: Is Practice Influenced by Doctrine? Public Performance & Management Review 38 (3): 514–41. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1006461.

Behn

Robert D

. 2002. The Psychological Barriers to Performance Management. Public Performance & Management Review 26 (1): 5–25. DOI: 10.2307/3381295.

Boyne

George A.

Walker

Richard M.

. 2004. Strategy Content and Public Service Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (2): 231–52. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muh015.

Bregn

Kirsten

. 2013. Detrimental Effects of Performance-Related Pay in the Public Sector? On the Need for a Broader Theoretical Perspective. Public Organization Review 13 (1): 21–35. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-012-0191-x.

Brewer

Gene A.

Walker

Richard M.

. 2010. The Impact of Red Tape on Governmental Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (1): 233–57. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mun040

Burke

Brendan F.

Costello

Bernadette C.

. 2005. The Human Side of Managing for Results. American Review of Public Administration 35 (3): 270–86. DOI: 10.1177/0275074005276349.

Christensen

Robert K.

Paarlberg

Laurie

Perry

James L.

. 2017. Public Service Motivation Research: Lessons for Practice. Public Administration Review 77 (4): 529–42. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12796.

10.

Condrey

Stephen E.

Paul Battaglio

Jr . 2007. A Return to Spoils? Revisiting Radical Civil Service Reform in the United States. Public Administration Review 67 (3): 425–36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00726_2.x.

11.

Dee

Thomas S.

Wyckoff

James

. 2015. Incentives, Selection, and Teacher Performance: Evidence from IMPACT. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34 (2): 267–97. DOI: 10.1002/pam.21818.

12.

DeHart-Davis

Leisha

Pandey

Sanjay K.

. 2005. Red Tape and Public Employees: Does Perceived Rule Dysfunction Alienate Managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (1): 133–48. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui007.

13.

Feeney

Mary K.

DeHart-Davis

Leisha

. 2009. Bureaucracy and Public Employee Behavior: A Case of Local Government. Review of Public Personnel Administration 29 (4): 311–26. DOI: 10.1177/0734371X09333201.

14.

Garengo

Patrizia

Sardi

Alberto

. 2020. Performance Measurement and Management in the Public Sector: State of the Art and Research Opportunities. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 70 (7): 1629–1654. ISSN-ISBN: 1741–0401. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0102.

15.

Halachmi

Arie

. 2005. Performance Measurement: Test the Water Before You Dive In. International Review of Administrative Sciences 71 (2): 255–66. DOI: 10.1177/0020852305053884.

16.

Kroll

Alexander

. 2017. Can Performance Management Foster Social Equity? Stakeholder Power, Protective Institutions, and Minority Representation. Public Administration 95 (1): 22–38. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12289.

17.

Moon

M. Jae

deLeon

Peter

, 2001. Municipal Reinvention: Managerial Values and Diffusion among Municipalities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (3): 327–51. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003505.

18.

Moynihan

Donald P

. 2005. Goal-based Learning and the Future of Performance Management. Public Administration Review 65 (2): 203–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00445.x.

19.

Moynihan

Donald P.

Pandey

Sanjay K.

. 2010. The Big Question for Performance Management: Why Do Managers Use Performance Information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 849–66. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muq004.

20.

Moynihan

Donald P.

Pandey

Sanjay K.

Wright

Bradley E.

. 2012. Prosocial Values and Performance Management Theory: Linking Perceived Social Impact and Performance Information Use. Governance 25 (3): 463–83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01583.x.

21.

Nicholson-Crotty

Sean

Nicholson-Crotty

Jill

Fernandez

Sergio

. 2017. Performance and Management in the Public Sector: Testing a Model of Relative Risk Aversion. Public Administration Review 77 (4): 603–14. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12619.

22.

O’Malley

Martin

. 2019. Smarter Government: How to Govern for Results in the Information Age. Redlands, CA: Esri Press.

23.

Pasha

Obed

. 2019. Does Substandard Performance Encourage Innovation Adoption? American Review of Public Administration 49 (5): 572–84. DOI: 10.1177/0275074018804559.

24.

Pasha

Obed

Kroll

Alexander

Ash

Michael

. 2021. Assessing the Equity and Effectiveness of PerformanceStat Systems. International Public Management Journal. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2021.1918300.

25.

Pasha

Obed

Poister

Theodore H.

Wright

Bradley E.

Thomas

John C.

. 2017. Transformational Leadership and Mission Valence of Employees: The Varying Effects by Organizational Level. Public Performance and Management Review 40 (4): 722–40. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2017.1335220.

26.

Peters

Thomas J.

Waterman

Robert H.

Jr.

1982. In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. New York: Harper & Row.

27.

Sanger

Mary Bryna

. 2008. From Measurement to Management: Breaking Through the Barriers to State and Local Performance. Public Administration Review 68 (Special Issue): S70 − S85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00980.x.

28.

Stazyk

Edmund C

. 2013. Crowding Out Public Service Motivation? Comparing Theoretical Expectations with Empirical Findings on the Influence of Performance-Related Pay. Review of Public Personnel Administration 33 (3): 252–74. DOI: 10.1177/0734371X12453053.

29.

Swiss

James E

. 2005. A Framework for Assessing Incentives in Results-Based Management. Public Administration Review 65 (5): 592–602. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00486.x.

30.

Torres

Lourdes

Pina

Vicente

Martí

Caridad

. 2015. Factors Explaining the Impact of Performance Measures in European Local Governments. Lex Localis—Journal of Local Self-Government 13 (2): 229–48. DOI: 10.4335/13.2.229-248(2015).

31.

Van Dooren

Wouter

Bouckaert

Geert

Halligan

John

. 2010. Performance Management in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.

32.

Walker

Richard M.

Andrews

Rhys

. 2015. Local Government Management and Performance: A Review of Evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 101–33. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mut038.

33.

Weibel

Antoinette

Rost

Katja

Osterloh

Margit

. 2010. Pay for Performance in the Public Sector—Benefits and (Hidden) Costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (2): 387–412. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mup009.