After decades of neglect, several U.S. states have increased support for regional development planning, creating new programs, organizations, and funding streams to support it. Analysis of programs in three states (New York, Michigan, and Indiana) shows similarities among them as well as contrasts with prior episodes of state-led regional planning. The new programs deliberately sidestep older regional planning organizations like COGs and RPCs in favor of new organizations with larger roles for the private sector and greater access to public funds. The resulting plans focus on individual projects within a pro-development agenda, but still have potential to coordinate action at a regional scale.
AbbottCarl. 1997. The Portland region: Where city and suburbs talk to each other—and often agree. Housing Policy Debate8 (1): 11–51.
2.
AbelsMichael. 2014. Strategic alignment for the new normal: Collaboration, sustainability, and deliberation in local government across boundaries. State and Local Government Review46 (3): 211–18.
3.
BowmanAnn O’M.FrankeJames L.. 1984. The decline of substate regionalism. Journal of Urban Affairs6 (4): 51–63.
4.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U. S. Dept. of Transportation. 2015. State transportation statistics 2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
5.
BurnhamEdward H.BennettEdward Herbert. 1909. Plan of Chicago. Chicago, IL: Commercial Club of Chicago.
6.
ChakrabortyArnab. 2010. Scenario planning for effective regional governance: Promises and limitations. State and Local Government Review42 (2): 156–67.
7.
ChapinTimothy S.2012. Introduction: From growth controls, to comprehensive planning, to smart growth: Planning’s emerging fourth wave. Journal of the American Planning Association78 (1): 5–15.
8.
Committee on Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs. 1929. Regional plan of New York and its environs. Philadelphia, PA: Wm. F. Fell Co. Printers.
9.
DabsonBrian. 2019. Regional solutions for rural and urban challenges. State and Local Government Review51 (4): 283–91.
FinnDonovanChandrasekharDivyaXiaoYu. 2019. A region recovers: Planning for resilience after superstorm Sandy. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19864145
12.
FishmanRobert. 2000. The death and life of American regional planning. In Reflections on regionalism, ed. KatzBruce, 107–26. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13.
FriedmannJohnBlochRobin. 1990. American exceptionalism in regional planning, 1933–2001. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14 (4): 576–601.
14.
FriedmannJohnWeaverClyde. 1979. Territory and function: The evolution of regional planning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
FrugGerald E.BarronDavid J.. 2008. City bound: How states stifle urban innovation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
GreenTimothy. 2016. The relationship between formal analysis and regional marketing: Evidence from a national survey of regional economic development partnerships. Regional Studies Association Second North America Conference, Atlanta, GA.
17.
GreenTimothyFinnDonovan. 2019. Collaborative governance or private sector power grab? An analysis of the changed governance of regional development planning in three U.S. states. Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning 59th Annual Conference, Greenville, SC.
18.
GrigsbyEugene J.III. 2003. Regional governance and regional councils. In Regional government innovations: A handbook for citizens and public officials, ed. KempRoger L., 287–93. Jefferson, NC: Mcfarland and Company, Inc.
19.
HanlonBernadetteShortJohn RennieVicinoThomas J.. 2009. Cities and suburbs: New metropolitan realities in the US. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
20.
HansenNilesHigginsBenjaminSavoieDonald J.. 1990. Regional policy in a changing world. New York: Plenum Press.
21.
Indiana Economic Development Corporation. 2014. Benchmarking U.S. regional cities: A study and guide for transformation. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Economic Development Corporation.
JulnesGeorgePindurWolfgang. 1994. Determinants of local governmental support for alternative forms of regional coordination. The American Review of Public Administration24 (4): 411–28.
24.
LewisRebeccaKnaapGerrit-Jan. 2012. Institutional structures for state growth management: An examination of state development plans. State and Local Government Review44 (1): 33–44.
25.
MeckSuart. 2002. Growing smart legislative guidebook: Model statutes for planning and the management of change. Chicago: American Planning Association.
MillerDavidNellesJen. 2020. Order out of chaos: The case for a new conceptualization of the cross-boundary instruments of American regionalism. Urban Affairs Review56 (1): 325–59.
30.
MogulofMelvin B.1971. Regional planning, clearances and evaluation: A look at the A-95 process. Journal of the American Institute of Planners37 (6): 418–22.
31.
MorrillRichard L.1989. Regional governance in the United States: For whom?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy7 (1): 13–26.
OlberdingJulie Cencula. 2002. Diving into the ‘third waves’ of regional governance and economic development strategies: A study of regional partnerships for economic development in U.S. metropolitan areas. Economic Development Quarterly16 (3): 251–72.
41.
OrfieldMyron. 1997. Metropolitics: A regional plan for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
42.
PelhamThomas G.2017. A historical perspective for evaluating Florida’s evolving growth management process. In Growth management in Florida: Planning for paradise, eds. ChapinTimothy StewartConnerlyCharles E.HigginsHarrison T., 33–48. New York: Routledge.
43.
PiroRockyLeiterRobertRooneySharon. 2017. Emerging trends in regional planning. Planning Advisory Service Report 586. Chicago: American Planning Association.
RenskiHenry. 2009. A new era of federal involvement in regional economic development? The case of the wired initiative. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27 (4): 593–611.
46.
RothblattDonald N.1994. North American metropolitan planning. Journal of the American Planning Association60 (4): 501–20.
47.
SeltzerEthanCarbonellArmando. 2011. Planning regions. In Regional planning in America: Practice and prospect, ed. SeltzerEthan and Armando, 1–16. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1928. A standard city planning enabling act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
51.
WallisAllan D.1992. New life for regionalism? Maybe. National Civic Review81 (1): 19–26.
52.
WeitzJerrySeltzerEthan. 1998. Regional planning and regional governance in the United States 1979-1996. Journal of Planning Literature12 (3): 361–92.
53.
WheelerStephen M.2000. Planning for metropolitan sustainability. Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (2): 133–45.
54.
WhismanHolly Erin Cooper. 2013. Regional councils and the influence of state laws on regional g. PhD diss., University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte. ProQuest (3608510).
55.
YinRobert K.2009. Case study research design and methods, 4th ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
