Millennials make up the largest share of the U.S. workforce; prioritize work–life balance, personal growth, and a sense of community; and may be well suited for a public service sector facing a wave of retirements. Recommendations for attracting millennials suggest cultural shifts within public administration are needed, yet knowledge remains limited on millennials already in public management. This article recaps the ongoing generational transition and helps fill these knowledge gaps with interviews of four millennial-aged city managers in Iowa. If validated by further research, these exploratory findings suggest millennial city managers will navigate the profession without requiring wholescale cultural shifts.
BenestFrank, ed. 2003. Preparing for the next generation: A guide for current and future local government managers. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
BuckwalterDoyle W.ParsonsRobert J.. 2000. Local city managers’ career paths: Which way to the top? The Municipal Year Book 2000: 17–21. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
CrumpackerMarthaCrumpackerJill M.. 2007. Succession planning and generational stereotypes: Should HR consider age-based values and attitudes a relevant factor or a passing fad?Public Personnel Management36:349–70.
ErtasNavbahar. 2015. Turnover intentions and work motivations of millennial employees in federal service. Public Personnel Management44:401–23.
8.
ErtasNevhahar. 2016. Millennials and volunteering: Sector differences and implications for public service motivation theory. Public Administration Quarterly40:517–58.
KellarElizabeth K. 2016b, December. Why local governments are talking about millennials: Shifting demographics make succession planning a high priority. Local Government Review: A Special Section of Public Management Magazine1:42–44.
NelsonKimberly L.SvaraJames H.. 2015. The roles of local government managers in theory and practice: A centennial perspective. Public Administration Review75:49–61.
21.
NgEddy S. W.GossettCharles W.. 2013. Career choice in Canadian public service: An exploration of fit with the millennial generation. Public Personnel Management42:337–58.
22.
NgEddy S. W.GossettCharles W.WinterRichard. 2016. Millennials and public service renewal: Introduction on millennials and public service motivation (PSM). Public Administration Quarterly40:412–28.
23.
PerryJames L.BuckwalterNeil D.. 2010. The public service of the future. Public Administration Review70:238–45.
ReddickChristopher G.DemirTansu. 2014. Professional identification and city managers: An analysis of a national survey. International Journal of Public Administration37:174–82.
26.
SvaraJames H.2007. Is there a future for city managers? The evolving roles of officials in council-manager government. International Journal of Public Administration12:197–212.
27.
SvaraJames H.2010. The next generation challenge: Incorporating the local government managers of the future. Journal of Public Affairs Education16:361–77.
28.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2019. Labor force statistics from the current population survey: Employed persons by detailed industry and age, 2018 annual averages. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat18b.htm(accessed January 18, 2019).
29.
WatsonDouglas J.HassettWendy L.. 2004. Career paths of city managers in America’s largest council-manager cities. Public Administration Review64:192–99.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
