Decreasing funding and devolution have put public workforce programs under constant
scrutiny by federal, state, and local officials wanting to get the most for their
investment. Besides asking whether invested dollars are yielding a return, policy makers
want to know under what conditions those returns are maximized and which program
components have the most influence. Using Return on Investment (ROI) and regression
analysis to examine two of Virginia’s publicly funded programs, I find that ROI can be
positive under the right circumstances. Further, participation in training as a component
improves the outcome. Obtaining a credential for that training yields an even higher ROI
and certain credentials yield the highest returns. However, results are differentiated by
training type, credential type, and program. Results here suggest that even in the current
era wherein streamlining and cuts are the new normal, strategic investment of scarce
workforce dollars can potentially yield real returns.
AbowdJohn M.StephensBryce E.VilhuberLarsAnderssonFredrikMcKinneyKevin L.RoemerMarcWoodcockSimon. 2009. The LEHD infrastructure files and the
creation of the Quarterly Workforce Indicators. In Producer
dynamics: New evidence from micro data, ed. DunneTimothyBradford JensenJ.RobertsMark J., 149–230. Chicago,
IL: University of Chicago
Press.
2.
AnderssonFredrikHolzerHarry J.LaneJulia I.RosenblumDavidSmithJeffrey. 2013. Does federally-funded job training work?
Nonexperimental estimates of WIA training impacts using longitudinal data on workers and
firms. No. w19446, National Bureau of
Economic Research. Accessed December 14, 2018.
https://www.nber.org/papers/w19446.
3.
AustinP. C.2011. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis:
An application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on
mortality. Multivariate Behavioral Research46:119–51.
4.
BarnowBurt S.1987. The impact of CETA programs on earnings: A review of the
literature. Journal of Human Resources22:157–93.
5.
BarnowBurt S.SmithJeffrey. 2015. Employment and training programs.
No. w21659. Washington, DC:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
BoutwellJohn A. Jr. 2008. A quantitative correlational study
of TAA worker retraining programs, worker
characteristics, and worker career outcomes. PhD
diss., University of
Phoenix.
7.
CarnevaleAnthony P.SmithNicoleStrohlJeff. 2013. Recovery: Job growth and education
requirements through 2020. Center on Education and Workforce
Reports, Center on Education and the Workforce. Accessed
December 1, 2018. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/559311.
8.
ChrisingerColleen K.2013. Earnings progression and the workforce investment act:
Evidence from Washington State. Industrial Relations: A Journal
of Economy and Society52:853–77.
9.
CollinsBenjamin. 2012. Trade adjustment assistance for
workers. Washington, DC:
Congressional Research Service. Accessed July
27, 2018. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42012.pdf.
DavisCarlDavisKellyGardnerMathewMcIntyreRobert S.McLynchJeffSopozhinikovaAlla. 2009. Who pays? A distributional analysis of the tax
systems in all 50 states. Washington, DC:
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
Accessed July 1, 2018. https://itep.org/wp-content/uploads/whopays3.pdf.
12.
DeckerPaul T.BerkJillian A.. 2011. Ten years of the Workforce Investment
Act (WIA): Interpreting the research on WIA and related programs.
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management30:906–26.
13.
EbertsRandall W.HuangWei-JangCaiJing. 2012. A methodology for setting state and
local regression-adjusted performance targets for Workforce Investment Act
programs. Working Paper: 13-189.
Kalamazoo: Upjohn Institute for
Employment Research.
14.
FrankAbbeyMinoffElisa. 2005. Declining share of adults receiving training
under WIA are low-income or disadvantaged. Washington,
DC: Center for Law and Social
Policy.
15.
GilothRobert. 2004. Workforce intermediaries: For the 21st
century. Philadelphia: Temple
University Press.
HeinrichCarolynMueserPeterTroskeKennethJeonKyung-SeongKahveciogluDaver. 2009. New estimates of public employment and
training program net impacts: A nonexperimental evaluation of the Workforce Investment
Act program. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4569. Accessed December
14, 2018. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1515116.
20.
HeinrichCarolynMueserPeterTroskeKennethJeonKyung-SeongKahveciogluDaver. 2013. Do public employment and training
programs work?IZA Journal of Labor Economics2:6.
21.
HolcombPamelaBarnowBurt S.. 2004. Serving people with disabilities through the
Workforce Investment Act’s one stop career centers. Baltimore,
MD: The Urban Institute and John Hopkins
University.
22.
HollenbeckKevin. 2009. Return on investment analysis of a selected
set of workforce system programs in Indiana. Report submitted to Indiana Chamber
of Commerce Foundation,
Indianapolis,
Indiana.
23.
HollenbeckKevin. 2012. Return on investment in workforce
development programs. Upjohn Institute Working Paper:
12-188. Kalamazoo Michigan:
Upjohn Institute for Employment
Research.
24.
HollenbeckKevinKingChristopher T.HuangWei-JangSchroederDaniel. 2005. Net impact estimates for services
provided through the Workforce Investment Act. Employment and
Training Administration Occasional Paper 2005–06. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of
Labor.
25.
HolzerHarry J. 2009. Workforce development policy as an
antipoverty tool: What do we know? What can we do? In Changing
poverty, changing policy, ed. CancianMariaDanzigerSheldon, 301–29. New
York: Russell Sage
Foundation.
KingRyan D.MassogliaMichaelMacMillanRoss. 2007. The context of marriage and crime:
Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood.
Criminology45:33–65.
28.
KingChristorpher T.O’SheaD. P.2003. Estimating return-on-investment (ROI) for Texas Workforce
Development Boards: Lessons learned and next steps. Austin,
TX: Ray Marshall Center for the Study of Human
Resources, Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at
Austin.
29.
KingChristopher T.TangYingSmithTara CarterSchroederD. G.. 2008. Returns from investments in workforce
services: Texas statewide estimates for participants, taxpayers and society.
Report presented to Texas Association of Workforce
Boards, 2008. Accessed December 14,
2018. https://raymarshallcenter.org/2008/08/31/returns-from-investment-in-workforce/.
30.
KornfeldRobertBloomHoward S.. 1999. Measuring program impacts on earnings
and employment: Do unemployment insurance wage reports from employers agree with surveys
of individuals?Journal of Labor Economics17:168–97.
31.
MartinLawrence L.LeveyRichardCawleyJenna. 2012. The “new normal” for local
government. State and Local Government Review44:17S–28S.
MazzeoChristopherRabSaraEachusSusan. 2003. Work-first or work-only: Welfare
reform, state policy, and access to postsecondary education. The
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science586:144–71.
34.
McMakinW.2013. SFY 2012 annual statistical report.
Virginia Department of Social
Services.
NisbetElizabethMcKayHeather A.HavilandSara. 2017. The emergence of local practices in a
devolved workforce investment system: Barriers and possibilities for enhancing degree
completion. Economic Development Quarterly31:183–95.
37.
OrrLarry L.1996. Does training for the disadvantaged work? Evidence from the
National JTPA Study. Washington, DC:
The Urban Institute.
38.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B.. 1983. The central role of the propensity
score in observational studies for causal effects.
Biometrika70:41–55.
39.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B.. 1985. Constructing a control group using
multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity
score. The American Statistician39:33–38.
40.
SchneiderMark. 2015. The value of sub-baccalaureate
credentials. Issues in Science and Technology31:67.
U.S. Government Accountability Office.
2000. Multiple employment training programs: Overlapping programs
can add unnecessary administrative costs.
GAO-01-71. Washington,
DC. Accessed July 1, 2018. http://www.gao.gov/assets/220/219163.pdf.
43.
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
2011. Multiple employment and training programs: providing
information on colocating services and consolidating administrative structures could
promote efficiencies. GAO-11-92. Washington, DC.
Accessed July 1, 2018. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-92.
44.
WallaceGeoffrey L.HavemanRobert. 2007. The implications of differences between
employer and worker employment/earnings reports for policy evaluation.
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management26:737–54.
45.
WandnerStephen A.2015. The future of the public workforce system in a time of
dwindling resources. In Transforming US workforce development
policies for the 21st century, ed. HornVanCarlTammy EdwardsGreeneTodd, 129–66. Kalamazoo,
MI: WE Upjohn Institute for Employment
Research.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
