This research examines the position of county clerk, where women are numerically disproportionately over-represented. Using data collected from the National Association of Counties and the U.S. Census Bureau, the models estimate the correlation between the county clerk’s sex and county-level demographic, social, and political factors with maximum likelihood logit estimates. This research suggests that while women are better represented in the office of county clerk across the United States, when compared to other elective offices, this representation may be because this office is not seen as attractive to men and its responsibilities fit within the construct of traditional gender norms.
AlkadryMohamad G.TowerLeslie E.. 2014. Women and public service: Barriers, challenges and opportunities. New York: Routledge.
2.
ArceneauxKevin. 2001. The “gender gap” in state legislative representation: New data to tackle an old question. Political Research Quarterly54(1):143–60.
3.
BauerNichole M.2017. Running local: Gender stereotyping and female candidates in local elections. Urban Affairs Review. doi: 10.1177/1078087418770807.
4.
BentonJ. EdwinByersJacquelineCiglerBeverly A.KlaseKenneth A.MenzelDonald C.SalantTanis J.StreibGregorySvaraJames H.WaughWilliam L.Jr2007. Conducting research on counties in the 21st century: A new agenda and database considerations. Public Administration Review67:968–83.
5.
BolesJanet K.2001. Local elected women and policy-making: Movement delegates for feminist trustees? In The impact of women in public office, ed. CarrollSusan, 68–88. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
6.
BurrellBarbara C. 2010. A woman’s place is in the house: Campaigning for congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
CarrollSusan J. 1994. Women as candidates in American politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
CarrollSusan J.SanbonmatsuKira. 2010. Entering the mayor’s office: Women’s decisions to run for municipal office. In Annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
ChappellLouiseWaylenGeorgina. 2013. Gender and the hidden life of institutions. Public Administration91:599–615.
12.
Crowder-MeyerMelodyGadarianShana KushnerTrounstineJessica. 2015. Electoral institutions, gender stereotypes, and women’s local representation. Politics, Groups, and Identities3:318–34.
13.
DarcyR.WelchSusanClarkJanet C.. 1994. Women, elections, and representation, 2nd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
DiamondIrene. 1977. Sex roles in the state house. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
16.
DolanKathy. 2018. Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. New York: Routledge.
17.
FordLynne. 2010. Women and politics: The pursuit of equality. Boston, MA: Cengage.
18.
FoxRichard L.LawlessJennifer L.. 2003. Family structure, sex-role socialization, and the decision to run for office. Women & Politics24:19–48.
19.
FoxRichard L.LawlessJennifer L.. 2004. Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. American Journal of Political Science48:264–80.
20.
FoxRichard L.LawlessJennifer L.. 2010. If only they’d ask: Gender, recruitment, and political ambition. The Journal of Politics72:310–26.
21.
FoxRichard L.SchuhmannRobert A.. 1999. Gender and local government: A comparison of women and men city managers. Public Administration Review59:231–42.
22.
FranceschetSusanPiscopoJennifer M.. 2012. Gender and political backgrounds in Argentina. In The impact of gender quotas, eds. SusanFranceschetLena KrookMonaPiscopoJennifer M., 43–56. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
FultonSarah A.2012. Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success. Political Research Quarterly65:303–14.
24.
HearnJeff. 1991. Men in the public eye: The construction and deconstruction of public men and public patriarchies, Vol. 4. New York: Taylor & Francis US.
25.
HedlundRonald D.FreemanPatricia K.HammKeith E.SteinRobert M.. 1979. The electability of women candidates: The effects of sex role stereotypes. The Journal of Politics41:513–24.
26.
HolmanMirya R.2014. Sex and the city: Female leaders and spending on social welfare programs in US municipalities. Journal of Urban Affairs36:701–15.
27.
HolmanMirya R.2015. Women in politics in the American city. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
28.
HolmanMirya R.2017. Women in local government: What we know and where we go from here. State and Local Government Review49:285–96.
29.
HtunMala N.JonesMark P.. 2002. Engendering the right to participate in decision-making: Electoral quotas and women’s leadership in Latin America. In Gender and the politics of rights and democracy in Latin America, eds. CraskeNikkiMolyneuxMaxine, 32–56. New York: Palgrave.
30.
KarnigAlbert K.Oliver WalterB.. 1976. Election of women to city councils. Social Science Quarterly56:605–13.
31.
KenneySally J.1996. New research on gendered political institutions. Political Research Quarterly49:445–66.
32.
KraneDaleRigosPlaton N.HillMelvin. 2001. Home rule in America: A fifty-state handbook. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33.
KrookMonaMackayFiona, Eds. 2010. Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism. New York: Springer.
34.
LovenduskiJoni. 1998. Gendering research in political science. Annual Review of Political Science1:333–56.
35.
LublinDavidBrewerSarah E.. 2003. The continuing dominance of traditional gender roles in Southern Elections. Social Science Quarterly84:379–96.
36.
MatlandRichard E.StudlarDonley T.. 1996. The contagion of women candidates in single-member district and proportional representation electoral systems: Canada and Norway. The Journal of Politics58:707–33.
37.
National Association of Counties. 2018. NACo county explorer: Mapping county data. https://explorer.naco.org/ (accessed July 1, 2018).
38.
NechemiasCarol. 1987. Changes in the election of women to U.S. state legislative seats. Legislative Studies Quarterly12:125–42.
39.
NorranderBarbaraWilcoxClyde. 1988. The geography of gender power: Women in state legislatures. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. SueThomasWilcoxClyde, 103–17. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
ReskinBarbara F.RoosPatricia A.. 2009. Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
42.
RuleWilma, 1990. Why more women are state legislators: A research note. Western Political Quarterly43 (2): 437–48.
43.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2002. Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science26 (1): 20–34.
44.
SchlesingerJoseph A. 1966. Ambition and politics: Political careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
45.
SchlozmanKay LehmanBurnsNancyVerbaSidney. 1999. What happened at work today? A multistage model of gender, employment, and political participation. The Journal of Politics61 (1): 29–53.
46.
SchneiderMonica C.HolmanMirya R.DiekmanAmanda D.McAndrewThomas. 2016. Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition. Political Psychology37:515–31.
47.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A.2005. The incumbency disadvantage and women’s election to legislative office. Electoral Studies24:227–44.
48.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A. 2009. Making quotas work: The effect of gender quota laws on the election of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly34:5–28.
49.
SeltzerRichardNewmanJodyLeightonMelissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in U.S. elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
50.
SmithAdrienne R.ReingoldBethOwensMichael Leo. 2012. The political determinants of women’s descriptive representation in cities. Political Research Quarterly65:315–29.
51.
StiversCamilla. 2002. Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state: Legitimacy and the administrative state. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
TrippAili MariKangAlice. 2008. The global impact of quotas on the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies41:338–61.
WelchSusan. 1977. Women as political animals? A test of some explanations for male-female political participation differences. American Journal of Political Science21 (4): 711–30.
55.
WilliamsL. SusanVillemezWayne J.. 1993. Seekers and finders: Male entry and exit in female-dominated jobs. In Doing women’s work: Men in non-traditional occupations, ed. ChristineL. Williams, 64–90. London, UK: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
