Stable revenue flows are paramount for policy makers at all levels of government in order to effectively and efficiently provide goods and services to constituents. This work examines the relationship between tax and expenditure limitations (TELs) and municipal revenue volatility. The current literature suggests that more stringently binding TELs at the state level are associated with greater levels of revenue volatility. This work tests whether this finding extends to the local level of government as well. Examining ninety-nine municipalities over eight years (2004–2011), this work provides evidence that the stringency level of TELs is associated with reduced fluctuations in municipal revenue streams.
AmielLindsayDellerStevenStallmanJudith. 2009. The construction of a tax and expenditure limitation index for the U.S. Staff Paper No. 536, Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
5.
BailsDale. 1990. The effectiveness of tax-expenditure limitations: a re-evaluation. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology49 (2): 223–38.
6.
BailsDaleTieslauMargie. 2000. The impact of fiscal constitutions on state and local expenditures. Cato Journal20 (2): 255–77.
7.
BerneRobertSchrammRichard. 1986. The financial analysis of the government. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
8.
BurnsNancy1994. Formation of American local governments: private values in public institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
CarrJered B.2006. Local government autonomy and state reliance on special district governments: A reassessment. Political Research Quarterly59 (3): 481–92.
10.
CoxJamesLoweryDavid. 1990. The impact of tax revolt era state fiscal caps. Social Science Quarterly71:492–509.
11.
CrainW. Mark. 2003. Volatile states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12.
CumminsJeff. 2012. The effects of legislative term limits on state fiscal conditions. American Politics Research41 (3): 417–42.
13.
DellerSteveStallmanJudithAmielLindsay. 2012. The impact of state and local tax and expenditure limitations on state economic growth. Growth and Change43 (1): 56–84.
14.
DownesThomasDyeRichard F.McGuireTherese J.. 1998. Do limits matter? Evidence of the effects of tax limitations on student performance. Journal of Urban Economics43 (3): 401–17.
15.
DownesThomas A.FiglioDavid N.. 1999. Do tax and expenditure limits provide a free lunch? Evidence on the link between limits and public sector service quality. National Tax Journal52: 113–22.
16.
DoyleMaura. 1994. Property tax limitations and the delivery of fire protection services. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Board Governors, Washington, DC.
17.
EldersHarold. 1992. Exploring the tax revolt: An analysis of the effectiveness of state tax and expenditure limitation laws. Public Finance Quarterly20:47–63.
FosterKathryn A.1997. Political economy of special-purpose government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
20.
FiglioDavidO’SullivanA.2001. The local response to tax limitation measures: Do local governments manipulate voters to increase revenues?Journal of Law and Economics44 (1): 233–57.
21.
FiglioDavidRuebenKim. 2001. Tax limits and the qualifications of new teachers. Journal of Public Economics80 (1): 49–71.
22.
Fiscal Policy Space. 2016. The fiscal policy space of cities: A comprehensive framework for city financial decision-making. College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago. Chicago, IL.
23.
FisherGlenn W.1996. The worst tax? A history of the property tax in America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
24.
GrierKevinTullockGordon. 1989. An empirical analysis of cross-national economic growth, 1951-1980. Journal of Monetary Economics24 (2): 259–76.
25.
HendrickRebecca. 2004. Assessing and measuring the fiscal health of local governments: Focus on Chicago metropolitan suburbs. Urban Affairs Review40 (1): 78–114.
26.
HoeneChristopherPaganoMichael. 2009. City fiscal conditions in 2009. Research Brief on America’s Cities2:1–11.
27.
KiokoSharon. 2011. Structure of state-level tax and expenditure limits. Public Budgeting and Finance31 (2): 43–78.
28.
KormendiRogerMeguirePhillip. 1985. Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics16 (2): 141–63.
29.
KousserThadMcCubbinsMathewMouleEllen. 2008. For whom the TEL tolls: Can state tax and expenditure limits effectively reduce spending?State Politics and Policy Quarterly8 (4): 331–61.
30.
LewisPaul G.2000. The durability of local government structure: Evidence from California. State and Local Government Review32 (1): 34–48.
31.
MacManusSusan A.1981. Special district governments: A note on their use as property tax relief mechanisms in the 1970s. Journal of Politics43 (November): 1206–14.
32.
MaherCraigDellerSteven. 2012. Measuring the impacts of TELs on municipal financial condition. In Handbook of local government fiscal health, ed. LevineH.JusticeJ. B.ScorsoneE. A., 405–26. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
33.
MaherCraigDellerStevenStallmanJudithParkSungho. 2016. The impact of tax and expenditure limits on municipal credit ratings. American Review of Public Administration46 (5): 592–613.
34.
MaherCraigParkSunghoHarroldJames. 2016. The effect of tax and expenditure limits on municipal pension and OPEB funding during the great recession. Public Finance and Management16 (2): 121–46.
35.
MarloweJustin. 2011. Beyond 5 percent: Optimal municipal slack resources and credit ratings. Public Budgeting and Finance31 (4): 93–108.
36.
McCabeBarbaraFeiockRichard. 2005. Nested levels of institutions: State rules and city property taxes. Urban Affairs Review40 (5): 634–55.
37.
McCubbinsMathewMouleEllen. 2010. Making mountains of debt out of molehills: The pro-cyclical implications of tax and expenditure limitations. National Tax Journal63 (3): 603–21.
38.
MillerGerald J.SvaraJames H.. 2009. Navigating the fiscal crisis: Testing strategies for local leaders. White Paper from the Alliance for Innovation Commissioned by the International City/County Managers Association. January, 2009, Washington, DC..
39.
MullinsDanielJoycePhillip. 1996. Tax and expenditure limitations and state and local fiscal structure: An empirical assessment. Public Budgeting and Finance 16 (1): 75–101.
40.
NewMichael. 2001. Limiting government through direct democracy: The case of state tax and expenditure limitations. Policy Analysis No. 420, Cato Institute, Stanford, CA.
41.
NewMichael. 2010. U.S. State tax and expenditure limitations: A comparative political analysis. State Politics and Policy Quarterly10 (1): 25–50.
42.
PiperAdrian. 2000. Finance in UK high technology small firms: An overview. Venture Capital2:143–53.
43.
RameyGaryRameyValerie. 1995. Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth. The American Economic Review85 (5): 1138–51.
44.
SkidmoreMark. 1999. Tax and expenditure limitations and the fiscal relationships between state and local governments. Public Choice99 (1): 77–102.
45.
SpringerJobLusbyAaronLeathermanJohnFeatherstoneAllen. 2009. An evaluation of alternative tax and expenditure limitation policies on Kansas local governments. Public Budgeting and Finance29 (2): 48–70.
46.
StaleyTucker. 2015. The effect of TELs on state revenue volatility: Evidence from the American states. Public Budgeting and Finance35 (1): 29–48.
47.
StaleyTucker. 2017. The impact of fiscal limits on state revenue volatility. American Review of Public Administration47 (4): 443–54.
48.
St. ClairTravis. 2012. The effect of tax and expenditure limitations on revenue volatility: Evidence from Colorado. Public Budgeting and Finance32 (3): 61–78.
49.
ThompsonFredGatesBruce. 2007. Betting on the future with a cloudy crystal ball? How financial theory can improve revenue forecasting and budgets in the states. Public Administration Review67 (5): 825–36.
50.
WallisJohnWeingastBarry. 2006. Dysfunctional or optimal institutions? State debt limitations, the structure of state and local governments, and the finance of American infrastructure. Staff Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
51.
WildavskyAaron. 1979. How to limit government spending. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
