The purpose of this article is to explore the intergovernmental finance framework with an emphasis on the impacts of the current administration’s proposals on cities, including not just direct financial transfers but also changes to the federal tax code that have implications for municipal finance. In particular, we examine the impacts of two policies—reduced funding of community development block grant and federal income tax reform—to illustrate the effects of federal reform on local governments in the context of American federalism. We contend that the resiliency of local governments to exogenous shocks such as changes in federal policy is contingent on economic resources and institutional constraints imposed by state governments.
AmielLindsayDellerStevenStallmannJudith I.. 2009. The construction of a tax and expenditure limitation index for the U.S. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Staff Paper No. 536, University of Wisconsin–Madison: Madison, WI.
2.
AuerbachAlan J.SlemrodJoel. 1997. The economic effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Journal of Economic Literature35:589–632.
3.
BentonJ. Edwin. 1992. The effect of federal aid on state and local government spending. Publius: The Journal of Federalism22:71–82.
4.
BentonJ. Edwin. 2007. George W. Bush’s federal aid legacy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism37:371–89.
5.
BoydDonaldDadayanLucyGaisThomasMalatrasJames. 2017, 4. State and local governments face six significant issues with the Trump tax cut outline. Rockefeller Institute of Government. http://www.rockinst.org/observations/boydd/2017-04-27_boyd.aspx(accessed May 22, 2017).
6.
BradburyKatharine L.LaddHelen F.PerraultMarkReschovskyAndrewYingerJohn. 1984. State aid to offset fiscal disparities across communities. National Tax Journal37:151–70.
7.
BrooksLeahPhillipsJustin H.. 2010. An institutional explanation for the stickiness of federal grants. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization26:243–64.
ColeRichardKincaidJohn. 2000. Public opinion and American federalism: Perspectives on taxes, spending, and trust—An ACIR update. Publius: The Journal of Federalism30:189–201.
12.
DuPulsNicoleLanganTrevorMcFarlandChristianaPanettlerlAngelinaRainwaterBrooks. 2017. City rights in an era of preemption: A state-by-state analysis. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
13.
EisingerPeter. 1998. City politics in an era of federal devolution. Urban Affairs Review33:308–25.
GalsterGeorgeWalkerChristopherBoxallPatrickHayesChristopherJohnsonJennifer. 2002. The impact of CDBG spending on urban neighborhoods. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/commdevl/cdbg_spending.html (accessed February 15, 2017).
16.
GoldSteven D.SarahRitchie. 1994. State actions affecting cities and counties, 1990–1993: De facto federalism. Public Budgeting & Finance, 14:26–53.
17.
HerzogHenry W.JrSchlottmannAlan M.1986. State and local tax deductibility and metropolitan migration. National Tax Journal39:189–200.
KincaidJohn. 1999. De Facto devolution and urban defunding: The priority of persons over places. Journal of Urban Affairs21:135–68.
20.
LaddHelen F.1994. Big-city finances. In Big-city politics, governance, and fiscal constraints, ed. PetersonGeorge E., 201–69. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
21.
LeiglandJames. 1997. Accelerating municipal bond market development in emerging economies: An assessment of strategies and progress. Public Budgeting & Finance17:57–79.
22.
MullinsDaniel R.JoycePhilip G.. 1996. Tax and expenditure limitations and state and local fiscal structure: An empirical assessment. Public Budgeting & Finance16:75–101.
23.
MullinsDaniel R.WallinBruce A.. 2004. Tax and expenditure limitations: Introduction and overview. Public Budgeting & Finance24:2–15.
24.
NathanRichard P.1983. State and local governments under federal grants: Toward a predictive theory. Political Science Quarterly98:47–57.
25.
NotoNonna A.ZimmermanDennis. 1984. Limiting state-local tax deductibility: Effects among the states. National Tax Journal37:539–49.
26.
PaganoMichael A.BowmanAnn O’M.KincaidJohn. 1995. The state of American federalism, 1990-1991. Publius: The Journal of Federalism21:1–26.
27.
PaganoMichael A.HoeneChristopherYonghongWuWangShuShiYuYaziciNisa. 2016. The fiscal policy space of cities: A comprehensive framework for city fiscal decision-making. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
WalkerDavid. 1991. American federalism from Johnson to Bush. Publius: The Journal of Federalism21:105–19.
36.
WangShu. 2015. Effects of state-imposed tax and expenditure limits on municipal revenue reliance: A new measure of TEL stringency with mixed methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
37.
WongKenneth K.PetersonPaul E.. 1986. Urban response to federal program flexibility. Urban Affairs Review21:293–309.
38.
WuYonghong. 2009. How municipal property tax responded to state aid cuts: The case of Massachusetts municipalities in the post-2001 fiscal crisis. Public Budgeting & Finance29:74–89.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
