As localities increasingly confront challenging fiscal circumstances, how are they prioritizing the interests of business vis-à-vis citizens’? While some scholars suggest an inverse relationship between localities’ developmental policies and social services provision, a zero-sum situation, others question this view. The second group of scholars suggest a positive-sum relationship where governments attend similarly to the interests of both business and citizens or where efforts devoted to business do not undermine social policy. Analyses of a national survey of county governments reveal support for both views, although the positive-sum hypothesis receives more affirmation. Counties are sustaining social safety nets even as they pursue business-friendly developmental policies.
AmentaEdwinHalfmannDrew. 2000. Wage wars: Institutional politics, WPA wages, and the struggle for U.S. social policy. American Sociological Review67:506–28.
2.
AmmonsDavidSmithKarl W.StenbergCarl W.. 2012. The future of local government: Will current stresses bring major, permanent changes?State and Local Government Review44:64S–75S.
3.
BartleJohn R.1996. Coping with cutbacks: City response to aid cuts in New York State. State and Local Government Review28:38–48.
4.
BélandDaniel. 2007. Neo-liberalism and social policy: The politics of ownership. Policy Studies28:91–107.
5.
BentonEdwin J.2008. County government. In Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy, eds. BearfieldDomonicDubnickMelvin, 426–31. doi:10.1081/E-EPAP-120043329.
6.
BetzMichael R.PartridgeMark D.KraybillDavid S.LobaoLinda. 2012. Why do localities provide economic development incentives? Geographic competition, political constituencies, and government capacity. Growth and Change43:361–91.
7.
BrownHana E.2013. Race, legality, and the social policy consequences of anti-immigration mobilization. America Sociological Review78:290–314.
8.
ChorevNitsan. 2010. On the origins of neoliberalism: Political shifts and analytical challenges. In Handbook of politics: State and society in global perspective, ed. LeichtKevin T.Craig JenkinsJ., 127–44. New York: Springer.
9.
ClarkCalOliver WalterB.. 1991. Urban political cultures, financial stress, and city fiscal austerity strategies. The Western Political Quarterly44:676–97.
10.
ClarkT. Nichols. 2000. Old and new paradigms for urban research: Globalization and the fiscal austerity and urban innovation project. Urban Affairs Review36:3–45.
11.
DillmanDon. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
12.
DonahueJohn D.1997. Disunited states: What’s at stake as Washington fades and states take the lead?New York: Basic Books.
13.
FeiockRichard C.1989. The adoption of economic development policies by state and local governments: A review. Economic Development Quarterly3:266–70.
14.
FisherPeter S.PetersAlan H.. 1998. Industrial incentives: Competition among American cities and states. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.
15.
FleischmannArnoldGreenGary P.KwongTsz Man. 1992. What’s a city to do? Explaining differences in local economic development policies. The Western Political Quarterly45:677–99.
16.
GastnerMichael T.ShaliziCosma R.NewmanM. E. J.. 2005. Maps and cartograms of the 2004 US presidential election results. Advances in Complex Systems8:117–23.
17.
GoetzStephenSwaminathanHema. 2006. Wal-Mart and county-wide poverty. Social Science Quarterly87:211–26.
18.
HackerJacob S.2004. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98:243–60.
19.
HackerJacob C.PiersonPaul. 2002. Business power and social policy: Employers and the formation of the American welfare state. Politics and Society30:277–325.
20.
HarveyDavid. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
HrebenarRonald J.ThomasClive S., eds. 1993. Interest group politics in the Midwestern states. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
23.
HuberEvelyneStephensJohn D.. 2005. Welfare states and the economy. In Handbook of economic sociology, 2nd ed., ed.SmelserNeilSwedbergRichard, 552–74. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
KantorPaul. 1995. The dependent city revisited: The political economy of urban development and social policy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25.
KatzMichael B.2001. The price of citizenship. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
26.
KayDavid L.PrattJames E.WarnerMildred E.. 2007. Role of services in regional economy growth. Growth and Change38:419–42.
27.
KlarnerCarl. 1999. Business interest group power, mass public preferences, and state public policy. Comparative State Politics20:35–55.
28.
KlarnerCarlMaoXiaotongBuchananStan. 2007. Business interest group power and temporary assistance to needy families. Social Science Quarterly88:104–19.
29.
LobaoLindaAduaLazarus. 2011. State rescaling and local governments’ austerity policies across USA, 2001–2008. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society4:419–35.
30.
LobaoLindaAduaLazarusHooksGregory. 2014. Privatization, business attraction, and social services across the United States: Local governments’ use of market-oriented, neoliberal policies in the post-2000 period. Social Problems61:644–72.
31.
LobaoLindaKraybillDavid. 2005. The emerging role of counties in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas. Economic Development Quarterly19:245–59.
32.
LobaoLindaKraybillDavid. 2009. Poverty and local governments: Economic development and community service provision in an era of decentralization. Growth and Change40:418–51.
33.
LoganJohnMolotchHarvey L.. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
MaherCraig S.DellerSteven C.. 2007. Municipal response to fiscal stress. International Journal of Public Administration30:1549–72.
35.
MartinLawrence L.LeveyRichardCawleyJenna. 2012. The ‘new normal’ for local government. State and Local Government Review44:17S–28S.
36.
NelsonKimberly L.2012. Municipal choices during a recession: Bounded rationality and innovation. State and Local Government Review44:44S–63S.
37.
OppSusan M.OsgoodJeffery L.Jr.RugeleyCynthia R.. 2014. City limits in a postrecessionary world: Explaining the pursuit of developmental policies after the great recession. State and Local Government Review46:236–48.
38.
PeckJamie. 2014. Pushing austerity: State failure, municipal bankruptcy and the crisis of fiscal federalism in the USA. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society7:17–14.
39.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City limits. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
40.
PetersonPaul E.1995. The price of federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
41.
PiersonPaul. 1996. The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics48:143–79.
42.
PrasadMonica. 2006. The politics of free markets: The rise of neoliberal economic policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
43.
ReeseLaura A.LarnellTwyla BlackmondSandsGary. 2010. Patterns of tax abatement policy lessons from the outliers?The American Review of Public Administration40:261–83.
44.
ReeseLaura A.RosenfeldRaymond A.. 2002. The civic culture of local economic development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
ReeseLaura A.RosenfeldRaymond A.. 2004. Local economic development in the United States and Canada: Institutionalizing policy approaches. American Review of Public Administration349:277–92.
SchramSanford F.1999. Introduction. In Welfare Reform: A Race to the Bottom?, eds. SchramSanford F.BeerSamuel H., 1–12. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
SchramSanford F.SossJoe. 2001. Success stories: Welfare reform, policy discourse, and the politics of research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science577:49–65.
50.
SellersJeffreyLidströmAnders. 2007. Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state. Governance20:609–32.
51.
StarkePeter. 2006. The politics of Welfare State retrenchment: A literature review. Social Policy and Administration40(1):104–120.
52.
SunJinping. 2010. Budget strategy: A survey of California county governments. The California Journal of Politics and Policy2:1–17.
53.
SwensonPeter. 2002. Capitalists against markets: The making of labor markets and welfare states in the United States and Sweden. New York: Oxford University Press.
WarnerMildred E.ZhengLingwen. 2013. Business incentive adoption in the recession. Economic Development Quarterly27:90–101.
56.
WassmerRobert W.AndersonJohn E.. 2001. Bidding for business: New evidence on the effect of locally offered economic development incentives in a metropolitan area. Economic Development Quarterly15:132–48.
57.
WolmanHarold (with David Spitzley). 1996. The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly10:115–50.
58.
XuYuanshuoWarnerMildred E.. 2015. Understanding employment growth in the recession: The geographic diversity of state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society8:359–77.
59.
ZhengLingwenWarnerMildred. 2010. Business incentive use among U.S. local governments: A story of accountability and policy learning. Economic Development Quarterly24:325–36.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
