Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study employs input–output (I/O) modeling at the state and county level to compare national estimates of the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The results show that more localized economies cannot achieve the results predicted by national models likely because of leakage of economic activity outside the boundaries of a single state or county. This study sheds light on methodological tools that forecasters and policy makers can use in making decisions based on economic impact of social safety net programs.

Keywords

multiplier effect input–output model food stamp economic impact

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Azis

I. J.

Mansury

. 2003. Measuring economy-wide impacts of a financial shock. ASEAN Economic Bulletin 20: 112–27.

Berner

Ozer

Paynter

. 2008. A portrait of hunger, the social safety net, and the working poor. Policy Studies Journal 36:403–20.

Blair

Millea

. 2002. Economic Impacts of Federal Medicaid Expenditures on Mississippi. Jackson, MS: Mississippi Health Policy.

Bonn

M. A.

Harrington

. 2008. A comparison of three economic impact models for applied hospitality and tourism research. Tourism Economics 14:769–89.

CBPP (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities). 2013. Policy basics: Introduction to SNAP. March 28, 2013. http://www.cbpp.org/files/policybasics-foodstamps.pdf (accessed June 6, 2013).

Certification of Eligible Households. 2012. 7 C.F.R. 273. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2012-title7-vol4/CFR-2012-title7-vol4-sec272-1/content-detail.html (accessed January 17, 2014).

Cline

S. A.

Weiler

Aydin

. 2011. The value of a name: Estimating the economic impact of public land designation. The Social Science Journal 48:681–92.

Congressional Budget Office (CBO). 2010. Estimated impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on employment and economic output from October 2009 through December 2009. http://cbo.gov/publication/21019. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

Cunnyngham

Sukasih

Castner

. 2013. Empirical bayes shrinkage estimates of state supplemental nutrition assistance program participation rates in 2008-2010 for all eligible people and the working poor. Mathematica Policy Research. http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/techpartrate2008-2010.pdf. (Accessed February 4, 2014)

10.

Day

Frances

. n.d. Principles of impact analysis and IMPLAN applications. Hudson, WI: MIG.

11.

Dumas

Hall

Garrett

. 2008. The economic impacts of Medicaidin North Carolina. NC Medical Journal 69: 78–87.

12.

Duncombe

Wong

. 1998. Building state and local government analytic capacity: Using regional economic models for analysis of public policy. State and Local Government Review 30:165–80.

13.

Eamon

M. K.

C. F.

Zhang

. 2012. Reframing the benefits and beneficiaries of public benefits programs. Children and Youth Services Review 34:15–26.

14.

FitzGerald

Holcombe

Dahl

Schwabish

. 2012. The supplemental nutrition assistance program. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.

15.

FNS (Food and Nutrition Services). 2012. Supplemental nutrition assistance program state activity report Fiscal Year 2011. Food and nutrition service, supplemental nutrition assistance program, program accountability and administration division. http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/qc/pdfs/2011_state_activity.pdf. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

16.

FRAC (Food Research and Action Center). 2012a. Food hardship rate in 2010-2011 by Congressional district (Map). http://frac.org/pdf/food_hardship_map_congdist_2010-2011.pdf. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

17.

FRAC (Food Research and Action Center). 2012b. FY2013 Budget. Retrieved January 17, 2014 from http://frac.org/leg-act-center/budget-and-appropriations/budget-analysis/.

18.

Geewax

2011. More Americans hungry for food stamps. National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/2011/08/28/139968385/slow-growth-economy-spikes-food-stamp-reliance?ft=1andf=1001andsc=twandutm_source=twitterfeedandutm_medium=twitter. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

19.

Hanson

2003. Food assistance research brief—Importance of child nutrition programs to agriculture. FANRR-34-12. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Washington, DC, USA.

20.

Hanson

2010. The food assistance national input–output multiplier (FANIOM) model and the stimulus effects of SNAP. ERR-103. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Washington, DC, USA.

21.

Hanson

Golan

E. H.

Vogel

S. J.

Olmsted

. 2002. Tracing the impacts of food assistance programs on agriculture and consumers: A computable general equilibrium model. Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Reports 33831. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Washington, DC, USA.

22.

Hanson

Oliveira

. 2009. Economic linkages between the WIC Program and the farm sector. Economic Brief 58992. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Washington, DC, USA.

23.

Haveman

Fisher

E. O.

Tseng

. 2009. Spending on county human services programs in California: An evaluation of economic impacts. http://sccounty01.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/bds/Govstream/BDSvData/non_legacy/agendas/2009/20090421/PDF/049.pdf. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

24.

Hoefer

Curry

. 2012. Food security and social protection in the United States. Journal of Policy Practice 11:59–76.

25.

Hughes

D. W.

Brown

Miller

McConnell

. 2008. Evaluating the economic impact of farmers’ markets using an opportunity cost framework. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40:253.

26.

IMPLAN Professional Version 2.0. 2004. IMPLAN professional version 2.0 users guide, analysis guide, data guide. 3rd ed. Stillwater: Minnesota IMPLAN Group LLC.

27.

IMPLAN to FTE Conversions. 2013. IMPLAN group LLC. http://implan.com/v4/index.php?option=com_multicategoriesandview=articleandid=628:628andItemid=10. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

28.

Lavallee

2011. FACT vs. FICTION: USDA’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. (USDA Blog). http://blogs.usda.gov/2011/06/24/fact-vs-fiction-usda%E2%80%99s-supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program/ (accessed January 17, 2014).

29.

Leftin

Eslami

Strayer

. 2011. Trends in supplemental nutrition assistance program participation rates: Fiscal year 2002 to fiscal year 2009. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.

30.

Lombe

Nebbitt

. 2009. Assessing effects of food stamp program participation on food security in female-headed households: Do informal supports matter? Journal of Policy Practice 8:301–16.

31.

McGregor

P. G.

McVittie

E. P.

Swales

J. K.

Yin

Y. P.

. 2000. The neoclassical economic base multiplier. Journal of Regional Science 40:1–31.

32.

McMahon

T. G.

Smith

M. G.

. 2013. The Arkansas valley “super ditch”—An analysis of potential economic impacts. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 49:151–62.

33.

Miguel-Velez

F. J. D.

Perez-Mayo

Jesus

. 2010. Poverty reduction and SAM multipliers: An evaluation of public policies in a regional framework. European Planning Studies 18:37–41.

34.

Miller

R. E.

Blair

P. D.

. 1985. Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

35.

Monacelli

Perotti

. 2011. Redistribution and the multiplier. IMF Economic Review 59:630–51.

36.

Moretti

2010. Local multipliers. American Economic Review 100:373–7.

37.

NCDHHS (North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services). 2012. County food and nutrition services participation reports. http://www.ncdhhs.gov/dss/stats/fsp.htm. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

38.

Oliff

May

Palacios

. 2012. States continue to feel recession’s impact. Washington, DC: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=viewandid=711. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

39.

Paynter

S. R.

Berner

M. M.

Anderson

E. U.

. 2010. When the even the “dollar value meal” costs too much: Food insecurity and long term dependence on food pantry assistance. Public Administration Quarterly 35: 26–58.

40.

Policy Basics. 2011. Policy basics: Introduction to the supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP). Washington, DC: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=viewandid=2226. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

41.

Pollin

Brenner

Luce

. 2002. Intended versus unintended consequences: Evaluating the New Orleans living wage ordinance. Journal of Economic Issues 36:843–75.

42.

Pordelli

McClung

Martin

. 2008. The economic impact of women-owned businesses in Northeast Florida. Journal of Management and Marketing Research 1:27.

43.

Puro

2010. Major acts of congress: Food stamp act of 1964. Washington, DC: Enotes Federal Interagency Reentry Council, (n.d.). Reentry mythbuster.

44.

Rosiak

2012. Top secret: $80B a year for food stamps, but feds won’t reveal what’s purchased. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/24/top-secret-what-food-stamps-buy/?page=all. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

45.

Seunga

C. K.

Watersby

E. C.

. 2009. Measuring the economic linkage of Alaska fisheries: A supply–driven social accounting matrix (SDSAM) approach. Fisheries Research 97:17–23.

46.

U.S. Census. 2009. American Community Survey. Table B19001: Household Income in the Past 12 months, 5 Year Estimate. United States Census Bureau. http://www.Census.gov. (Accessed January 12, 2012).

47.

U.S. Census. 2010. U.S. Decennial Census. United States Census Bureau. http://www.Census.gov.

48.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2009. Table B-3. United States Department of Agriculture. Food and Nutrition Services. Retrieved January 12, 2012 from http://www.fns.usda.gov/ora/menu/Published/snap/FILES/Participation/2009Characteristics.pdf.

49.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2011. Characteristics of supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap) households: Fiscal year 2010. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Research and Analysis. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Service.

50.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2012a. A Short history of SNAP. United States Department of Agriculture. Food and Nutrition Services. http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/rules/Legislation/about.htm. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

51.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2012b. FY 2012 Budget Summary and Annual Performance Plan. Office of Budget and Program Analysis. Retrieved January 17, 2014 from http://www.obpa.usda.gov/budsum/FY12budsum.pdf.

52.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2012c. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Research and Analysis. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Service. http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/18SNAPavg$PP.htm. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

53.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2012d. SNAP: Eligibility. Food and Nutrition Services. Retrieved January 17, 2014 from http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/applicant_recipients/Eligibility.htm.

54.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2012e. SNAP: Regulations. Food and Nutrition Services. http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/rules/regulations/default.htm. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

55.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2012f. SNAP: Using SNAP. Food and Nutrition Services. http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/applicant_recipients/using_foodstamps.htm. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

56.

Zandi

2010. Too Soon to Pull Back Fiscal Policy Support. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/files/2010-12-6econ.pdf. (Accessed January 17, 2014).

Policy Implications of Projecting the Multiplier Effects of Social Safety Net Programs Using IMPLAN

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References