Although the number of female governors has more than doubled over the past thirty years, few studies examine whether gender influences the policy interests of governors. To address this gap in the literature, we analyze whether gender affects the policy agendas of governors. Conducting a content analysis of state of the state speeches between 2006 and 2008, we examine whether gender influences the presence of social welfare policies on the policy agendas of governors. Even after controlling for political and situational factors, our results suggest that female governors devote more agenda attention to social welfare policy than their male colleagues.
AveryJames M.PeffleyMark. 2005. Voter registration requirements, Voter turnout, and welfare eligibility policy: Class bias matters. State Politics and Policy Quarterly5:47–67.
2.
BarrileauxCharlesHolbrookThomasLangerLaura. 2002. Electoral competition, legislative balance, and American State welfare policy. American Journal of Political Science46:415–27.
3.
BarthJayFergusonMargaret R.. 2002. Gender and gubernatorial personality. Women & Politics21:63–82.
4.
BarrettEdith J.1995. The policy priorities of African American women in State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly20:223–47.
5.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan D.1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BeardPatricia.1996. Growing Up Republican. New York: HarperCollins.
7.
BeckSusan Abrams. 2001. Acting as women: The effects and limitations of gender in local governance. In The impact of women in public office, ed. Carroll, 49-67Susan J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
BernickE. LeeWigginsCharles W.. 1991. Executive-legislative relations: The governor’s role as chief legislator. In Gubernatorial leadership and state policy, eds. B. HerzikEricBrown, 73-91Brent W.. New York: Greenwood Press.
9.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American States, 1960-1993. American Journal of Political Science42:327–48.
10.
BeyleThad. 2004. Governors. In Politics in the American States. 8th ed., eds. GrayVirginiaHanson, 194-231Russell L.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
11.
BohanJanis S.1993. Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism, and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly17:5–21.
12.
BolesJanet K.2001. Local elected women and policy making. In The impact of women in public office, ed. Carroll, 68-88Susan J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13.
BrattonKathleen A.HaynieKerry L.. 1999. Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: The effects of gender and race. Journal of Politics61:658–79.
14.
BrownRobert D.1995. Party cleavages and welfare effort in the American states. American Political Science Review89:23–33.
15.
Center for American Women and Politics. 2012. Women in elective office fact sheet 2012. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
16.
ChodorowNancy J.1978. The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkley: University of California Press.
17.
CoffeyDaniel J.2006. Altering perceptions: State economic performance and gubernatorial agendas. Paper presented at the sixth annual conference on state politics and policy, May 19–20, Lubbock, TX.
18.
ConoverPamela Johnston. 1988. Feminists and the gender gap. The Journal of Politics 50:985–1010.
19.
DawsonRichard E.RobinsonJames A.. 1963. Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American States. The Journal of Politics25:265–89.
20.
DiLeoDaniel. 2001. To develop or redistribute? An analysis of the content of governors’ agendas. State and Local Government Review33:52–59.
21.
EricksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.. 1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
22.
FellowesMatthew C.RoweGretchen. 2004. Politics and the new American welfare States. American Journal of Political Science48:363–73.
23.
FergusonMargaret R.2003. Chief executive success in the legislative arena. State Politics and Policy Quarterly3:158–82.
24.
GoslingJames L.1985. Patterns of influence and choice in the Wisconsin budgetary process. Legislative Studies Quarterly10:457–82.
25.
GrayVirginia. 2004. The socioeconomic and political context of states. In Politics in the American states. 8th ed., eds. GrayVirginiaHanson, 1-30Russell L.. WashingtonDC: CQ Press.
26.
GrossDonald. 1991. The policy role of governors. In Gubernatorial leadership and state policy, eds. HerzikEric B.BrownBrent W.1-24. New York: Greenwood Press.
27.
HeidbrederBrianne. 2012. Agenda Setting in the States: How Politics and Policy Needs Shape Gubernatorial Agendas. Politics & Policy40:296–319.
28.
HerzikEric B.1991. Policy agendas and gubernatorial leadership. In Gubernatorial leadership and state policy, eds. HerzikEric B.Brown, 25-38Brent W.. New York: Greenwood Press.
29.
KathleneLyn. 1995. Alternative views of crime: Legislative policymaking in gendered terms. Journal of Politics57:696–723.
30.
KingdonJohn. 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
31.
KuninMadeleine May. 1994. Living a political life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
32.
LongJ. Scott. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
LongJ. ScottFreeseJeremy. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
34.
PoggioneSarah. 2004. Exploring gender differences in state legislators’ policy preferences. Political Research Quarterly57:305–14.
35.
ReingoldBeth. 2000. Representing women: Sex, gender, and legislative behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North California Press.
36.
RichardsAnn. 1989. Straight from the heart. New York: Simon and Schuster.
37.
Saint-GermainMichelle A.1989. Does their difference make a difference? The impact of women on public policy in the Arizona legislature. Social Science Quarterly70:956–68.
38.
ShapiroRobert Y.MahajanHarpreet. 1986. Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1970s. Public Opinion Quarterly50:42–61.
39.
SharkanskyIra. 1968. Agency requests, gubernatorial support and budget success in state legislatures. The American Political Science Review62:1220–31.
40.
SinclairBarbara. 1986. The role of committees in agenda setting in the U.S. congress. Legislative Studies QuarterlyXI:35–45.
41.
SossJoeSchramSanford F.VartanianThomas P.O'BrienErin. 2001. Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution. American Journal of Political Science45:378–95.
42.
StuckyThomas D.MillerGeralyn M.MurphyLinda M.. 2008. Gender, guns, and legislating: An analysis of state legislative policy preferences. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy29:477–95.
43.
SwersMichele L.2002. The difference women make: The policy impact of women in congress. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
44.
SwersMichele L.2005. Connecting descriptive and substantive representation: An analysis of sex differences in cosponsorship activity. Legislative Studies Quarterly30:407–33.
45.
Taylor-RobinsonMichelle M.HeathRoseanna Michelle. 2003. Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? A critical case test. Women & Politics24:77–101.
46.
ThomasSue. 1991. The impact of women on state legislative policies. Journal of Politics53:958–76.
47.
ThomasSue. 1992. The effects of race and gender on constituency service. The Western Political Quarterly45:169–80.
48.
ThomasSueWelchSusan. 1991. The impact of gender on activities and priorities of state legislators. The Western Political Quarterly44:445–56.
49.
ThompsonJoel A.1987. Agency requests, gubernatorial support, and budget success in state legislatures revisited. Journal of Politics49:756–79.
50.
Tolleson-RinehartSue. 2001. Do women leaders make a difference? Substance, style, perception. In The impact of women in public office, ed. Carroll, 149-165Susan J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
51.
TweedieJack. 2000. From D.C. to Little Rock: Welfare reform at Mid-term. Publius: The Journal of Federalism30:69–97.
52.
VanAssendelftLauraA.1997. Governors, agenda setting, and divided government. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
53.
VegaArturoFirestoneJuanita M.. 1995. The effects of gender on congressional behavior and the substantive representation of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly20:213–22.
54.
WeberRonald E.BracePaul, eds. 1999. American state and local politics: Directions for the 21st Century. New York: Chatham House.
55.
WeikartLynne A.ChenGregWilliamsDaniel W.HromicHaris. 2006. The democratic sex: Gender differences and the exercise of power. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy28:119–40.
