This study reports the findings of a comparative case study analysis of sixteen U.S. municipalities to provide an in-depth examination of the choices municipal leaders are making to address revenue shortfalls. The findings suggest that municipal fiscal choices during a recession fit the bounded rationality model. While local government leaders will attempt to follow a rational sequence of fiscal management decisions, as the economic situation worsens, the external pressures from electoral considerations, state government restrictions, and interest group involvement increase, leading a divergence in strategies. The greater the pressures (the bounds), the more unpredictable the choices among municipalities become.
AmielLindsayDellerStevenStallmanJudith. 2009. The construction of a tax and expenditure limitation index for the U.S(Staff paper no. 536). Madison: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
2.
AmmonsDavid N.FleckTrevor A.2010. Budget-balancing tactic in local government. Chapel Hill: School of Government, University of North Carolina.
3.
BartleJohn R.1996. Coping with cutbacks: City response to aid cuts in New York State. State and Local Government Review28:38–48.
4.
BorinsSanford S.2008. Innovations in government: Research, recognition, and replication. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
5.
BoyneGeorge A.Gould-WilliamsJulian S.LawJenniferWalkerRichard M.2005. Explaining the adoption of innovation: An empirical analysis of public management reform. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23:419–35.
6.
ClarkTerry N. ed. 1994. Urban innovation: Creative strategies for turbulent times. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
CyertRichard M.MarchJames G.1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
8.
DamanpourFariborzSchneiderMarguerite. 2009. Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19:495–522.
9.
DownesGeorge W.RockeDavid M.1984. Theories of budgetary decision-making and revenue decline. Policy Sciences16:329–47.
10.
EbdonCarol. 2000. The relationship between citizen involvement in the budget process and city structure and culture. Public Productivity and Management Review23:383–93.
11.
ElazarDaniel. 1984. American Federalism: A view from the states. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
12.
FeiockRichard C.KimJaehoon H.2001. Form of government, administrative organization, and local economic development policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11:29–41.
13.
FeiockRichard C.JeongMoon-GiKimJaehoon. 2003. Credible commitment and council-manager government: Implications for policy instrument choices. Public Administration Review63:616–25.
14.
ForresterJohn P.SpindlerCharles J.1990. Assessing the impact of the elimination of GRS on municipal revenues. State and Local Government Review22:73–82.
15.
HendrickRebecca. 2004. Assessing and measuring the fiscal health of local governments: Focus on Chicago suburban municipalities. Urban Affairs Review40:78–114.
16.
HoeneChristopher W.PaganoMichael A.2010. Research brief on America’s cities: City fiscal conditions in 2010. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
17.
HoeneChristopher W.PaganoMichael A.2011. Research brief on America’s cities: City fiscal conditions in 2011. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
18.
KenyonDaphne A.LangleyAdam H.2010. Payments in lieu of taxes: Balancing municipal and nonprofit interests. Policy focus report. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
19.
KrebsTimothy B.PelisseroJohn P.2010. Urban managers and public policy: Do institutional arrangements influence decisions to initiate policy?Urban Affairs Review45:393–411.
20.
LevineCharles H.1978. Organizational decline and cutback management. Public Administration Review38:316–25.
21.
LindblomCharles E.1959. The science of “muddling through.”Public Administration Review19:79–88.
22.
MaherCraig S.DellerSteven C.2007. Municipal responses to fiscal stress. International Journal of Public Administration30:1549–72.
MoonM. JaedeLeonPeter. 2001. Municipal reinvention: Managerial values and diffusion among municipalities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11:327–52.
25.
MorganDavid R.PammerWilliam J.Jr1988. Coping with fiscal stress: Predicting the use of financial management practices among U.S.cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly24:69–86.
PaganoMichael A.1988. Fiscal disruptions and city responses. Urban Affairs Quarterly24:118–37.
28.
PammerWilliam J.Jr1990. Managing fiscal strain in major American cities. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
29.
ScorsoneEric A.PlerhoplesChristina. 2010. Fiscal stress and cutback management amongst state and local governments: What we have learned and what remains to be learned?State and Local Government Review42:176–87.
30.
ScottW. RichardDavisGerald F.2007. Organizations and organizing: rational, natural, and open system perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
31.
SimonHerbert A.1957. Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: Wiley.
32.
SkidmoreMarkScorsoneEric A.2011. Causes and consequences of fiscal stress in Michigan cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics41:360–71.
33.
WalkerRichard M.2008. An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18:591–615.
34.
WatsonDouglas J.1997. Innovative governments: Creative approaches to local problems. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.
35.
WolmanHarold.1980. Local government strategies to cope with fiscal pressure. In Fiscal stress and public policy, pp. 231–248. ed. LevineCharles H.RubinIrene. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
WolmanHarold. 1983. Understanding local government responses to fiscal pressure: A cross national analysis. Journal of Public Policy3:245–63.
37.
WolmanHarold. 1986. Innovation in local government and fiscal austerity. Journal of Public Policy6:159–80.
38.
ZulloRoland. 2009. Does fiscal stress induce privatization: Correlates of private and intermunicipal contracting 1992-2002. Governance: An International Journal of Policy22:459–81.
