AgranoffRobert. 2006. Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review66 (s1): 56–65.
2.
AgranoffRobertMcGuireMichael1999. Expanding intergovernmental management's hidden dimensions. American Review of Public Administration29:352–69.
3.
AgranoffRobertMcGuireMichael. 2003. Collaborative public management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
4.
AnsellChrisGashAlison2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18:543–71.
5.
AxelrodRobert M.1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
6.
BentonJ. Edwin. 2005. An assessment of research on American counties. Public Administration Review65:462–74.
7.
BentonJ. EdwinMenzelDonald C.. 1991. County service trends and practices: The case of Florida. State and Local Government Review23:69–75.
8.
BentonJ. EdwinByersJacquelineCiglerBeverly A.KlaseKenneth A.MenzelDonald C.SalantTanis J.StreibGregorySvaraJames H.WaughWilliam L.Jr.2007. Conducting research on counties in the 21st century: A new agenda and database considerations. Public Administration Review67:968–83.
9.
BentonJ. EdwinByersJacquelineCiglerBeverly A.KlaseKenneth A.MenzelDonald C.SalantTanis J.StreibGregorySvaraJames H.WaughWilliam L.Jr.. 2008. Service challenges and governance issues confronting American counties in the 21st century: An overview. State and Local Government Review40:54–68.
10.
BermanDavid R.SalantTanis J.. 1996. The changing role of counties in the intergovernmental system. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge, ed.MenzelD. C.. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
11.
BinghamLisaO'LearyRosemary, eds. 2008. Big ideas in collaborative public management. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
12.
BrownTrevor L.PotoskiMatthew2003. Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review63:153–64.
California State Controller.2008. Cities annual report. 96th ed.Sacramento: State of California.
15.
CarrJered B.KaruppusamyShanthi2008. The adapted cities framework: On enhancing its use in empirical research. Urban Affairs Review43:875–86.
16.
CarrJered B.GerberElisabeth R.LupherEric W.. 2009. Explaining horizontal and vertical cooperation on public services in Michigan: The role of local fiscal capacity. In Sustaining Michigan: Metropolitan policies and strategies, ed.JelierR.SandsG.. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
17.
CarrJered B.LeRouxKellyShresthaManoj2009. Institutional ties, transaction costs, and external service production. Urban Affairs Review44:403–27.
18.
ChenYu-CheThurmaierKurt. 2009. Interlocal agreements as collaborations: An empirical investigation of impetuses, norms, and success. American Review of Public Administration39:536–52.
19.
CiglerBeverly A.1999. Pre-conditions for the emergence of multicommunity collaborative organizations. Policy Studies Review16:86–102.
20.
ClingermayerJames C.FeiockRichard C.. 1997. Leadership turnover, transaction costs, and external city service delivery. Public Administration Review57:231–39.
21.
ClingermayerJames C.FeiockRichard C.. 2001. Institutional constraints and policy choice: An exploration of local governance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
ClingermayerJames C.FeiockRichard C.StreamChristopher2003. Governmental uncertainty and leadership turnover: Influences on contracting and sector choice for local services. State and Local Government Review35:150–60.
23.
DillmanDon A.2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
24.
FeiockRichard C. ed. 2004. Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
25.
Feiock, Richard C. ed. 2007. Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs29:47–63.
26.
FeiockRichard C., ed. 2008. Institutional collective action and local government collaboration. In Big ideas in collaborative public management, ed. BinghamL. B.O'LearyR.. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
27.
Feiock, Richard C. ed. 2009. Metropolitan governance and institutional collective action. Urban Affairs Review44:356–77.
28.
FeiockRichard C.TaoJillJohnsonLinda2004. Institutional collective action: Social capital and the formation of regional partnerships. In Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation, ed.FeiockR. C.,. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29.
FredericksonH. George. 1999. The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science & Politics32:701–11.
HonadleBeth Walter. 1984. Alternative service delivery strategies and improvement of local government productivity. Public Productivity Review8:301–13.
32.
HoogheLiesbetMarksGary2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review97:233–43.
33.
Joassart-MarcelliPascaleMussoJuliet. 2005. Municipal service provision choices within a metropolitan area. Urban Affairs Review40:492–519.
34.
KellerLawrence F.1989. City managers and federalism: Intergovernmental relations in the administrative city. In Ideal and practice in council-manager government, ed.FredericksonH. G.. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
35.
LeRouxKelly. 2008. Nonprofit community conferences: The role of alternative regional institutions in interlocal service delivery. State and Local Government Review40:160–72.
36.
LeRouxKellyCarrJered B.. 2007. Explaining local government cooperation on public works: Evidence from Michigan. Public Works Management & Policy12:344–58.
37.
LewisPaul G.BarbourElisa1999. California cities and the local sales tax. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
38.
LindenRussell M.2002. Working across boundaries: Making collaboration work in government and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
MacManusSusan A.1996. County boards, partisanship and elections. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge, ed.MenzelD. C.. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
40.
MarandoVincent L.1968. Inter-local cooperation in a metropolitan area: Detroit. Urban Affairs Quarterly4:185–200.
41.
MatkinDavid S.T.George FredericksonH.. 2009. Metropolitan governance: Institutional roles and interjurisdictional cooperation. Journal of Urban Affairs31:45–66.
42.
McGuireMichael. 2006. Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review66 (s1): 33–43.
43.
MenzelDonald C. ed. 1996. The American county: Frontiers of knowledge. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
44.
MenzelDonald C.MarandoVincent L.ParksRoger B.WaughWilliam L.Jr.CiglerBeverly A.SvaraJames H.Mann ReevesMavisEdwin BentonJ.ThomasRobert D.StreibGregorySchneiderMark1992. Setting a research agenda for the study of the American county. Public Administration Review52:173–82.
45.
MillerGary J.1981. Cities by contract: The politics of municipal incorporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
MorganDavid R.HirlingerMichael W.. 1991. Intergovernmental service contracts: A multivariate explanation. Urban Affairs Quarterly27:128–44.
47.
OakersonRonald J.1999. Governing local public economies: Creating the civic metropolis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
48.
OlberdingJulie Cencula. 2002. Does regionalism beget regionalism? The relationship between norms and regional partnerships for economic development. Public Administration Review62:480–91.
49.
OstromElinorGardnerRoyWalkerJames1994. Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
50.
ParkKeeok. 1997. Friends and competitors: Policy interactions between local governments in metropolitan areas. Political Research Quarterly50:723–50.
51.
ParksRoger B.1991. Counties in the federal system: The interlocal connection. Intergovernmental Perspective17:28–32.
52.
ParksRoger B.OakersonRonald J.. 1993. Comparative metropolitan organization: Service production and governance structures in St. Louis (MO) and Allegheny County (PA). Publius23:19–39.
53.
RobertsNancy C.KingPaula J.. 1991. Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory1:147–75.
54.
SchneiderMark. 1989. The competitive city: The political economy of suburbia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
55.
SchneiderMarkOk ParkKee. 1989. Metropolitan counties as service delivery agents: The still forgotten governments. Public Administration Review49:345–52.
56.
SchneiderMarkTeskePaulMintromMichael1995. Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
SchneiderMarkScholzJohnLubellMarkMindrutaDenisaEdwardsenMatthew2003. Building consensual institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science47:143–58.
58.
SokolowAlvin D.1993. State rules and the county-city arena: Competition for land and taxes in California's central valley. Publius23:53–69.
59.
SonenblumSidneyKirlinJohn J.RiesJohn C.. 1977. How cities provide services: An evaluation of alternative delivery structures. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
60.
SteinRobert M.1990. Urban alternatives: Public and private markets in the provision of local services. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
61.
StreibGregory. 1996. Strengthening county management. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge, ed.MenzelD.. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
62.
StreibGregoryWaughWilliam L.Jr.1991. Administrative capacity and the barriers to effective county management. Public Productivity & Management Review15:61–70.
63.
SvaraJames H.1996. Leadership and professionalism in county government. In American county: Frontiers of knowledge, ed.MenzelD.. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
64.
ThomsonAnn MariePerryJames L.MillerTheodore K.. 2009. Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19:23–56.
65.
ThurmaierKurtWoodCurtis2002. Interlocal agreements as overlapping social network: Picket-fence regionalism in metropolitan Kansas City. Public Administration Review62:585–98.
66.
ThurmaierKurtWoodCurtis. 2004. Interlocal agreements as an alternative to consolidation. In City-county consolidation and its alternatives: Reshaping the local government landscape, ed.CarrJ. B.FeiockR. C.. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
67.
TourangeauRogerRipsLance J.RasinskiKenneth2000. The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
WaughWilliam L.Jr.1994. Regionalizing emergency management: Counties as state and local government. Public Administration Review54:253–58.
69.
WikstromNelson. 1977. Councils of governments: A study of political incrementalism. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
70.
WilliamsPaul. 2002. The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration80:103–24.
71.
WoodCurtis. 2006. Scope and patterns of metropolitan governance in urban America: Probing the complexities in the Kansas City region. American Review of Public Administration36:337–53.
72.
WoodCurtis. 2008. The nature of metropolitan governance in urban America: A study of cooperation and conflict in the Kansas City region. Administration & Society40:483–501.
73.
WrightDeil S.1973. Intergovernmental relations in large council-manager cities. American Politics Quarterly1:151–88.