AndrewSimon A.2009. Regional integration through contracting networks: An empirical analysis of institutional collection action. Urban Affairs Review44:378–402.
2.
AndrewSimon A.. Forthcoming. Adaptive versus restrictive contracts: Can they resolve different risk problems? In Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action, ed.ScholzJohn T.FeiockRichard. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AtkinsPatricia S.1997. Local intergovernmental agreements: Strategies for cooperation. International City/County Management Association Management Information System Report29, no. 7 (July).
4.
BollensJohn C.SchmandtHenry1965. The metropolis: Its people, politics and economic life. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
BrownTrevor L.PotoskiMatthew2003. Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13:441–68.
6.
CarrJered B.KarrupusamyShanthi2009. Beyond ideal types of municipal structure: Adapted cities in Michigan. American Review of Public Administration39:304–21.
7.
CarrJered B.GerberElisabethLupherEric2009. Local fiscal capacity and intergovernmental contracting: Horizontal and vertical cooperation in Michigan. In Sustaining Michigan: Metropolitan policies and strategies, ed.JelierRichardAdelajaSojiSandsGary, 207–35. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
8.
CarrJered B.LeRouxKellyShresthaManoj2009. Institutional ties, transaction costs, and external service production. Urban Affairs Review44:403–27.
9.
ChenYu-CheThurmaierKurt. Forthcoming. Interlocal agreements as collaborations: An empirical investigation of impetuses, norms, and success. American Review of Public Administration.
10.
Citizens Research Council of Michigan.2005. Catalog of local government services. CRC Memorandum 1079 (September). Livonia: Citizens Research Council of Michigan.
11.
CollinsScott. 2006. Interlocal service-sharing agreements. IQ Report38, no. 3. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
12.
DyeThomas R.LeibmanCharles S.WilliamsOliver P.HermanHarold1963. Differentiation and cooperation in a metropolitan area. Midwest Journal of Political Science7:145–55.
13.
FeiockRichard C.2007. Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs29:47–63.
FosterKathryn A.1998. Municipal cooperative agreements in western New York: Survey findings. Institute for Local Governance and Regional Growth, State University of New York at Buffalo. regional-institute. buffalo.edu/Includes/UserDownloads/munic-coop-finalreport-1998.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2009.
16.
FredericksonH. George. 1999. The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science & Politics32:701–11.
17.
FriesemaPaul L.1971. Metropolitan political structure: Intergovernmental relations and political integration in the quad-cities. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
18.
FrugGerald E.2002. Beyond regional government. Harvard Law Review115:1763–836.
19.
GilletteClayton P.2001. Regionalization and interlocal bargains. New York University Law Review76:190–271.
20.
LeRouxKelly. 2006. The role of structure, function, and networks in explaining interlocal service delivery: A study of institutional cooperation in Michigan. PhD diss., Wayne State University.
21.
LeRouxKellyCarrJered B.. 2007. Explaining local government cooperation on public works: Evidence from Michigan. Public Works Management & Policy12:344–58.
22.
LynnPhil. 2005. Mutual aid: Multijurisdictional partnerships for meeting regional threats, new realities: Law enforcement in the post 9/11 era. Washington, DC: U.S Department of Justice, Office of Justice Program, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
23.
MacManusSusanCarusonKiki2008. Financing homeland security and emergency preparedness: Use of interlocal cost-sharing. Public Budgeting and Finance (Summer): 48–68.
24.
MillerGary J.1981. Cities by contract: The politics of municipal incorporation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25.
MorganDavidHirlingerMichael1991. The decision to contract out city services: A further explanation. Western Political Quarterly41:363–72.
26.
MortonLois W.ChenYu-CheMorseRicardo S.. 2008. Small town civic structure and interlocal collaboration for public services. City and Community7:45–60.
27.
NicholsonWilliam C.2007. Legal issues in emergency management: Principles and practice for local government. In Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government. 2nd ed., ed.WaughWilliamTierneyKathleen. Washington, DC: ICMA Press.
28.
NunnSamuelRosentraubMark1997. Dimensions of interjurisdictional cooperation. Journal of the American Planning Association63:205–19.
29.
RaabJörg. 2002. Where do policy networks come from?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory12:581–622.
30.
RawlingsLynette. 2003. The determinants of cooperation among local governments in metropolitan areas. PhD diss., George Washington University.
31.
ReynoldsLaurie. 2003. Intergovernmental cooperation, metropolitan equity, and the new regionalism. Washington Law Review78:93–160.
32.
ScholzJohn T.FeiockRichard Forthcoming. Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
ShresthaManoj. Forthcoming. Do risk profiles of services alter contractual patterns? A comparison across multiple metropolitan services. In Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action, ed.ScholzJohn T.FeiockRichard. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
SonenblumS.KirlinJ. J.RiesJ. C.. 1977. How cities provide services. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
35.
SteinRobert. 1990. Urban alternatives: Public and private markets in the provision of local services. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
36.
TaylorGary D.BassettEllen2007. Exploring boundaries in governance: Intergovernmental boundary agreements. State and Local Government Review39:119–30.
37.
ThurmaierKurtChenYu-Che. 2005. A statewide survey of interlocal agreements. Paper presented at the Creating Collaborative Communities Conference, Wayne State University.
38.
ThurmaierKurtWoodCurtis H.. 2002. Interlocal agreements as overlapping social networks: Picket-fence regionalism in metropolitan Kansas City. Public Administration Review62:585–96.
39.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1985. Intergovernmental service arrangements for delivering local public services: Update 1983. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
40.
WilliamsOliver. 1971. Metropolitan political analysis. New York: Free Press.
41.
WoodCurtis H.2004. Metropolitan governance in urban America: A study of the Kansas City region. PhD diss., University of Kansas.
42.
WoodCurtis H.. 2006. Scope and patterns of metropolitan governance in urban America: Probing the complexities in the Kansas City Region. American Review of Public Administration36:337–53.
43.
ZeemeringEric. 2008a. Governing interlocal cooperation: City council interests and the implications for public management. Public Administration Review64:731–41.
44.
ZeemeringEric. 2008b. Negotiation and noncooperation: Debating Michigan's conditional land transfer agreement. State and Local Government Review40:1–11.