BollensScott A.1997. Fragments of regionalism: The limits of southern California governance. Journal of Urban Affairs19:105–22.
2.
CollinsJean-PierreLeveilleeJacquesPoitrasClaire. 2002. New challenges and old solutions: Metropolitan reorganization in Canadian and U.S. city-regions. Journal of Urban Affairs24:317–32.
3.
FeiockRichard C.2001. Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
4.
GageRobert W.1993. Leadership and regional councils: A mismatch between leadership styles and future roles. State and Local Government Review25:9–18.
5.
GageR. W.McDowellB. D.. 1995. ISTEA and the role of MPOs in the new transportation environment: A midterm assessment. Publius25:133–54.
6.
GainsboroughJuliet F.2001. Bridging the city-suburb divide: States and the politics of regional cooperation. Journal of Urban Affairs23:495–512.
7.
GoetzAndrew R.Stephen DempseyPaulLarsonCarl. 2002. Metropolitan planning organizations: Findings and recommendations for improving transportation planning. Publius32:87–105.
8.
GoldmanToddDeakinElizabeth2000. Regionalism through partnerships? Metropolitan planning since ISTEA. Berkeley Planning Review14:46–75.
9.
HamiltonDavid K.2002. Regimes and regional governance: The case of Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs24:403–23.
10.
HamiltonDavid K.MillerDavid Y.PaytasJerry2004. Exploring the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the governing of metropolitan regions. Urban Affairs Review40:147–82.
11.
KramerJeffWilliamsKristineSeggermanKarenHopesChristina2006. Assessing the practice of public involvement in Florida. Tampa: Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida.
12.
McDowellBruce. D.1999. Improving regional transportation decisions: MPOs and certification. Washington, DC: Brookings Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
13.
MilwardH. BrintonProvanKeith G.. 2000. How networks are governed. In Governance and performance: New perspectives, ed.HeinrichC. J.LynnL. E.. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
14.
MilwardH. BrintonProvanKeith G.. 2001. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public organizational networks. Public Administration Review61:414–23.
OlberdingJulie C.2002. Does regionalism beget regionalism? The relationship between norms and regional partnerships for economic development. Public Administration Review62:480–92.
17.
O'TooleLawrence J.MeierKenneth J.. 2003. Plus ça change: Public management, personnel stability, and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13:43–64.
18.
O'TooleLawrence J.MeierKenneth J.. 2004. Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14:469–94.
19.
ProvanKeithKenisPatrick2005. Nodes of network governance and implications for network management and effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Public Management Research Association, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
20.
RiverstoneLori A.2005. Federal funding and the new regionalism: Blurring the lines of federalism. PhD diss., University of Tennessee.
21.
VisserJames A.2004. Voluntary regional councils and the new regionalism: Effective governance in the smaller metropolis. Journal of Planning Education and Research24:51–65.
22.
VogelRonald K.NezelkewiczNorman2002. Metropolitan planning organizations and the new federalism: The case of Lousville. Publius32:107–29.
23.
WallisAllan D.1993. Governance and the civic infrastructure of metropolitan regions. National Civic Review82:125–40.
24.
WallisAllan D.. 2001. Making regions viable by making them imageable. National Civic Review90:75–84.
25.
WeberEdward P.KhademianAnne M.. 2008. Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review68:334–48.
26.
WikstromNelson. 1977. Councils of governments: A study of political incrementalism. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
27.
WolfJames F.Kolar BryanTara. 2007. Voluntary regional councils and metropolitan governance: Structures, processes and programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Washington, DC.
28.
WolfJames F.FenwickMary2003. How metropolitan planning organizations incorporate land-use issues in regional transportation planning. State and Local Government Review35:122–31.