AgranoffRobertMcGuireMichael2001. Big questions for public network management research. Journal of Public Management Research and Theory11:205–327.
2.
AgranoffRobertMcGuireMichael. 2003. Collaborative public management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
BankoffGregFrerksGeorgHilhorstDorothea ed. 2004. Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development, and people. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
4.
BirklandThomas A.1997. After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
5.
CarusonKikiMacManusSusan A.. 2006. Mandates and management challenges in the trenches: An intergovernmental perspective on homeland security. Public Administration Review66:522–36.
6.
ClarkeSusan E.ChenowethErica2006. The politics of vulnerability: Constructing local performance regimes for homeland security. Review of Policy Research23:95–114.
7.
ClarkeWes. 2006. Emergency management in county government: A national survey. Athens: National Center for the Study of Counties, Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia.
8.
CutterSusan L.2006. Hazards, vulnerability, and environmental justice. London and Sterling: Earthscan.
9.
CutterSusan L.BoruffBryan J.ShirleyLynn W.. 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly84:242–61.
10.
EdwardsFrances L.2007. Federal intervention in local emergency planning: Nightmare on Main Street. State and Local Government Review39:31–43.
11.
EisingerPeter. 2004. The American city in the age of terror: A preliminary assessment of the effects of September 11. Urban Affairs Review40:115–30.
12.
GerberBrian J.2007. Disaster management in the United States: Examining key political and policy challenges. Policy Studies Journal35:227–38.
13.
GerberBrian J.CohenDavid B.CannonBrianPattersonDennisStewardKendra2005. On the front line: American cities and the challenge of homeland security preparedness. Urban Affairs Review41:182–210.
14.
KettlDonald F.2007. System under stress: Homeland security and American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
15.
LiebermanEvan S.2005. Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review99:435–52.
16.
LindstromBonnie. 1998. Regional cooperation and sustainable growth: Nine councils of government in northeastern Illinois. Journal of Urban Affairs20:327–42.
17.
LubellMarkSchneiderMarkScholzJohn T.MeteMihriye2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science46:148–63.
18.
MacManusSusan A.CarusonKiki2006. Code red: Florida city and county officials rate threat information sources and the homeland security advisory system. State and Local Government Review38:12–22.
19.
MintromMichaelVergariSandra1998. Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. Journal of Politics60:126–48.
20.
MitchellJames K.1999. Crucibles of hazard: Mega-cities and disasters in transition. New York: United Nations University Press.
21.
MitchellJames K.. 2003a. The fox and the hedgehog: Myopia about homeland vulnerability in U.S. policies on terrorism. Terrorism and disaster: New threats, new ideas, ed.ClarkeLee. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
22.
MitchellJames K.. 2003b. Urban vulnerability to terrorism as hazard. In The geographical dimensions of terrorism, ed.CutterS. L.RichardsonD. B.WilbanksT. J.. New York: Routledge.
23.
OlsonMancur. 1971. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24.
PellingMark. 2003. The vulnerability of cities: Natural disasters and social resilience. London: Earthscan.
25.
PierreJon. 2000. Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
SavitchH. V.2003. Does 9–11 portend a new paradigm for cities?Urban Affairs Review39:103–27.
27.
ScavoCarmineKearneyRichard C.KilroyRichardJr.2008. Challenges to federalism: Homeland security and disaster response. Publius38:81–110.
28.
South Carolina Emergency Management Division, Office of the Adjutant General.2002. State of South Carolina hazards assessment. Columbia: Hazards Research Lab, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina.
29.
StoneClarence N.1989. Regime politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
30.
StoneClarence N.. 1998. Introduction: Urban education in political context. In Changing urban education, ed.StoneClarence N.. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
31.
TierneyKathleen J.1985. Emergency medical preparedness and response in disasters: The need for interorganizational coordination. Public Administration Review45:77–84.
32.
ValeLawrence J.CampanellaThomas J.. 2005. Axioms of resilience. In The resilient city, ed.ValeL. J.CampanellaT. J.. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
WalkerDavid B.2000. The rebirth of federalism: Slouching toward Washington. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
34.
WaughWilliam L.Jr.1994. Regionalizing emergency management: Counties as state and local government. Public Administration Review54:253–58.
35.
WeibleChristopher M.2005. Beliefs and perceived influence in natural resource conflict: An advocacy coalition approach to policy networks. Political Research Quarterly58:461–75.
36.
WiseCharles R.2006. Organizing homeland security after Katrina: Is adaptive management what's missing?Public Administration Review66:302–18.