AgranoffRobertMcGuireMichael1998. Multi-network management: Collaboration and the hollow state in local economic policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8:67–91.
2.
AgranoffRobertMcGuireMichael. 2003. Inside the matrix: Integrating the paradigms of intergovernmental and network management. International Journal of Public Administration26:1401–22.
3.
BardachEugene. 1998. Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4.
BillenPatriciaNathanRichard2004. Indiana case study. In The Workforce Investment Act in eight states: State case studies from a field network evaluation. Vol. 2, ed. Burt S. Barnow, Amy M. Buck, Daniel O'Shea, Christopher King, Peter Mueser, Deanna Sharpe, Laura Leete, and Neil Bania. www.doleta.gov/reports/recent-release.cfm. Accessed April 28.
5.
Congressional Quarterly.2002. Congress and the nation. Vol. X, 571–75. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
6.
DexterLewis A.1970. Elite and specialized interviewing. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
7.
DownsAnthony. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
GrubbW. NortonBadwayNorenaBellDeniseChiBernadetteKingChrisHerrJuliePrinceHeathKazisRichardHicksLisaCombs TaylorJudith. 1998. Toward order from chaos: State efforts to reform workforce development systems. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
10.
Illinois Workforce Investment Board.2001. State of Illinois: Supporting education and training through the Illinois Workforce Development System. Springfield: State of Illinois.
11.
Indiana Department of Workforce Development.2000. Strategic five year state workforce investment plan. www.state.in.us/dwd/policy/wia. Accessed June 12, 2002.
12.
GrubbW. NortonBadwayNorenaBellDeniseChiBernadetteKingChrisHerrJuliePrinceHeathKazisRichardHicksLisaCombs TaylorJudith. 2002. Training Indiana's workforce 2001–2002. Indianapolis: State of Indiana.
13.
Kansas Department of Human Resources. 2000. Workforce Investment Act five year strategic plan. www.kansasjobs.org/newWIA.htm. Accessed June 12, 2002.
14.
KeiserLael R.MeierKenneth J.. 1996. Policy design, bureaucratic incentives, and public management: The case of child support enforcement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6:337–64.
KingGaryKeohaneRobert O.VerbaSidney2004. The importance of research design. In Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards, eds.BradyHenry E.CollierDavid. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
18.
LoweryDavid. 2000. A transactions costs model of metropolitan governance: Allocation versus redistributions in urban America. Journal of Pubic Administration Research and Theory10:49–78.
19.
LynnLaurence E.Jr.HeinrichCarolyn J.HillCarolyn J.. 2001. Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
20.
MazmanianDaniel A.SabatierPaul1983. Implementation and public policy. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Co.
21.
MilesMatthew B.Michael HubermanA.. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
MilwardH. BrintonProvanKeith G.. 1998. Principles for controlling agents: The political economy of network structure. Journal of Public Administration Review8:203–21.
23.
MirengoffWilliamRindlerLester1976. The Comprehensive Employment and Training Act: Impact on people, places, programs. An interim report. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
24.
Missouri Department of Economic Development, Missouri Training and Employment Council.2001. Strategic five-year state workforce investment plan for Title I of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (workforce investment systems) and The Wagner-Peyser Act. www.ecodev.state.mo.us/mtec/proposal/NEWWIASTATEPLANWITHCHANGESMOD12001.pdf. Accessed November 20.
25.
MueserPeterSharpeDeanna2004. Missouri case study. In The Workforce Investment Act in eight states: State case studies from a field network evaluation. Vol. 1, Burt S. Barnow, Amy M. Buck, Daniel O'Shea, Christopher King, Peter Mueser, Deanna Sharpe, Laura Leete, and Neil Bania. www.doleta.gov/reports/recent-release.cfm. Accessed April 28.
OlberdingJulie C.2002. Does regionalism beget regionalism? The relationship between norms and regional partnerships for economic development. Public Administration Review62:432–43.
28.
O'TooleLaurence J.Jr.2000. Research on policy implementation assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10:263–88.
29.
PerkmannMarkus. 2003. Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban and Regional Studies10:153–71.
30.
RaginCharles C.1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkley: University of California Press.
31.
RaginCharles C.. 2004. Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research. In Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards, ed.BradyHenry E.CollierDavid. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
U.S. Department of Labor.1999. Federal register. Part II 20 CRR Part 652 et al. Workforce Investment Act; Interim Final Rule. Washington, DC: GPO.
37.
WarnerMildredHefetzAmir2002. Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity, and voice. Urban Affairs Review38:70–89.