Performance Reporting: An Emerging Imperative with Unintended Consequences?

Ammons David N. Rivenbark William C. . 2008. Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project. Public Administration Review 68:304–18.

Barzelay Michael . 2001. The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Berman Evan Wang XaioHu 2000. Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review 60:409–20.

Brignall Stan Modell Sven 2000. An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the “new public sector” management. Accounting Research 11:281–306.

Broadbent Jane Guthrie James 1992. Changes in the public sector: A review of recent “alternative” accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 5:3–31.

Cunningham Gary M. Harris Jean 2001. A heuristic framework for accountability of governmental subunits. Public Management Review 3:145–65.

Cunningham Gary M. Harris Jean . 2005. Toward a theory of performance reporting to achieve public sector accountability: A field study. Public Budgeting & Finance 25:15–42.

Franklin Aimee . 2000. An examination of bureaucratic reactions to institutional controls. Public Productivity and Management Review 24:8–21.

Frederickson George . 2007. When accountability meets collaboration. Public Administration Times 30:11.

Gendron Yves Cooper David J. Townley Barbara 2007. The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32:101–29.

Governmental Accounting Standards Board. 1994. Concept statement number 2, service efforts and accomplishments reporting. Norwalk, CT: GASB.

Gendron Yves Cooper David J. Townley Barbara . 2006. FAF board of trustees confirms GASB jurisdictional authority with respect to service efforts and accomplishments. www.gasb.org/news/jurisdiction.html. Accessed January 6, 2008.

Gendron Yves Cooper David J. Townley Barbara . 2007a. GASB adds project to assist governments that choose to report performance information. www.gasb.org/news/nr040607.html. Accessed October 16.

Gendron Yves Cooper David J. Townley Barbara . 2007b. GASB project—general information. www.seagov.org/sea-gasb-project/. Accessed January 10, 2008.

Government Finance Officers Association. 2007a. GASB cleared to proceed on performance measurement. www.gfoa.org/GASB-SEA.shtml. Accessed February 7, 2008.

Gendron Yves Cooper David J. Townley Barbara . 2007b. The GFOA's position on the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). www.gfoa.org/gasb.shtml. Accessed January 6, 2008.

Gendron Yves Cooper David J. Townley Barbara . 2007c. Recommended practice performance management: Using performance measurement for decision making. www.gfoa.org/downloads/budgetperfmanagement.pdf. Accessed November 24.

Harris Jean . 2005. The discourse of governmental accounting and auditing. Public Budgeting and Finance (special issue A): 154–79.

Hood Christopher . 1991. A public management for all seasons? Public Administration Review 69:3–19.

Ives Martin . 1992. 25 years of state and local government financial reporting—an accounting standards perspective. Government Accountants Journal 41:1–5.

Jordan Megan Hackbart Merle 1999. Performance budgeting and performance funding in the states: A status assessment. Public Budgeting and Finance 19: 68–88.

Joyce Phil Tompkins Susan 2002. Using performance information for budgeting: Clarifying the framework and investigating recent state experience. In Meeting the challenges of performance-oriented government, ed. Newcomer Kathryn Jennings Edward T. Broom Cheryle Lomax Alan . Washington, DC: American Society for Public Administration.

Kelly Janet M. 2004. The dilemma of the unsatisfied customer in a market model of public management. Public Administration Review 65:76–84.

Kelly Janet Rivenbark William C. . 2003. Performance budgeting for state and local government. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

Long Edward Franklin Aimee 2004. The paradox of implementing the government performance and results act: Top-down direction for bottom-up implementation. Public Administration Review 64:309–19.

Melkers Julia Willoughby Kathryn G. . 1998. The state of the states: Performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review 58:66–73.

Melkers Julia Willoughby Kathryn G. . 2001. Budgeters' views of state performance-budgeting systems: Distinctions across branches. Public Administration Review 61:54–64.

Meyer John W. 1992. Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Meyer Marshall W. Gupta Vipin 1994. The performance paradox. Research in Organizational Behavior 16:309–69.

Modell Sven . 2001. Performance measurement and institutional processes: A study of managerial responses to public sector reform. Management Accounting Research 12:437–64.

Moynihan Donald P. 2005. Why and how do state governments adopt and implement “managing for results” reforms? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:219–43.

Moynihan Donald P. . 2006. Managing for results in state government: A decade of reform. Public Administration Review 66:77–89.

National Performance Review. 1993. From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Nicholson-Crotty Sean Theobald Nick A. Nicholson-Crotty Jill . 2006. Disparate measures: Public managers and the use of multiple performance measures. Public Administration Review 66:101–13.

Poister Theodore Streib Gregory 1999. Performance assessment in municipal government. Public Administration Review 59:325–35.

Power Michael . 1996. Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21:289–315.

Power Michael . 1997a. The audit society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Power Michael . 1997b. Expertise and the construction of relevance: Accountants and environmental audit. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28:379–94.

Radin Beryl A. 2006. Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Rivenbark William C. Kelly Janet M. . 2006. Performance budgeting in municipal government. Public Productivity and Management Review 30:31–42.

Sinclair Amanda . 1995. The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20:219–37.

Smith Peter . 1995. On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration 18: 277–310.

Townley Barbara . 2001. The cult of modernity. Financial Accountability & Management 17:303–10.

Townley Barbara Cooper David J. Oakes Leslie 2003. Performance measures and the rationalization of organizations. Organization Studies 24:1045–71.

Wang XaioHu . 2002. Assessing performance measurement impact: A study of U.S. local governments. Public Performance & Management Review 26:26–43.

Willoughby Katherine M. Melkers Julia 2000. Implementing PBB: Conflicting views of success. Public Budgeting and Finance 20:105–20.