AgranoffR.McGuireM.. 2004. Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
BeaKeith. 2004. Emergency management preparedness standards: Overview and options for Congress. Order Code RL 32520, September 21. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
3.
BentonJ. Edwin. 2002a. Counties as service delivery agents: Changing expectations and poles. New York: Praeger.
4.
BentonJ. Edwin. 2002b. County service delivery: Does structure matter?Public Administration Review62: 423–31.
5.
BentonJ. Edwin. 2003a. County government structure and county revenue policy: What's the connection?State and Local Government Review35:78–89.
6.
BentonJ. Edwin. 2003b. The impact of structural reform on county government service provision. Social Science Quarterly84:858–74.
7.
BentonJ. Edwin. 2003c. Local government administration: County government. In Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy, ed.RabinJack, 261–66. New York: Marcel Dekker.
8.
BermanDavid R.SalantTanis J.. 1996. The changing role of counties in the intergovernmental system. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge, ed.MenzelDonald C., 19–33. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
9.
BowmanJames S.WestJonathan P.Van WartMontgomeryBermanEvan M.. 2004. The professional edge: Competencies in public service. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
10.
BoydDonald. 2005. State and local governments face continued fiscal pressure. Albany: Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York.
11.
BrumbackG. B.1998. Institutionalizing ethics in government. In Ethics edge, ed.BermanE. M.WestJ. P.BonczekS. J., 61–71. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
12.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.2003. Medicaid managed care enrollment as of June 30, 2003. Washington, DC: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
13.
CherrieVictoria. 2005. Draft of Dell contract sheds light on details. Winston-Salem Journal. www.journalnow.com. Accessed March 29.
14.
CiglerBeverly A.1993. State-local relations: A need for reinvention?Intergovernmental Perspective19:15–18.
15.
CiglerBeverly A.. 1996. Revenue diversification among U.S. counties. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge, ed.MenzelDonald C., 166–83. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
16.
CiglerBeverly A.. 2002. Administration in the modern American county. In Future of county government administration, ed.George FredericksonH.NalbandianJohn, 157–74. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
17.
Committee to Assess the Scientific Basis of the Total Maximum Daily Load Approach to Water Pollution Reduction.2001. Assessing the TMDL approach to water quality management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18.
El NasserHaya. 2005. Sprawl closes in on military facilities. USA Today, February 2, 3A.
19.
ElliottV. S.2002. Public health funding: Feds giveth but the states taketh away. Chicago: American Medical Association.
20.
GonzalesJ.2002. NACo: Public health, funding are key. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties.
21.
HoeneChristopherBaladassareMarkShiresMichael2002. The development of counties as municipal governments: A case study of Los Angeles County in the twentieth-first century. Urban Affairs Review37:575–91.
22.
Hy RonaldJ.WaughWilliam L.Jr.1995. State and local tax policies: A comparative handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
23.
JohnstonJ. M.RomzekB. S.. 1999. Contracting and accountability in state Medicaid reform: Rhetoric, theories, and reality. Public Administration Review59:383–89.
24.
KassirerJ. P.1995. Our ailing public hospitals—cure them or close them?New England Journal of Medicine333:1348–49.
25.
KlaseKenneth A.Geun SongSoo. 2000. Evaluating the influence of the county manager form of government on county conflict. Public Administration Quarterly24:286–304.
26.
KraybillDavidLoboaLinda2001. National Association of Counties county government survey: Changes in the new millennium. www.NACo.org. Accessed December 30, 2004.
27.
LandonBruce E.SchneiderEric C.TobiasCarolEpsteinArnold M.. 2004. The evolution of quality management in Medicaid managed care. Health Affairs23:245–54.
28.
LoganChristopher. 2004. Politics and promises: Rhetoric meets the reality of a slowdown in homeland security funding. Governing Magazine. Securing the Homeland. October (supplement): 10–15.
29.
MeierKenneth J.O'TooleLaurence J.. 2003. Public management and educational performance: The impact of managerial networking. Public Administration Review63:689–99.
National Association of Counties. 2001a. Gateway communities: A NACo presidential initiative. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties.
33.
National Association of Counties. 2001b. Stormwater management: Three profiles of county-based initiatives. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties.
34.
National Association of Counties. 2004. The American county platform and resolutions. www.NACo.org. Accessed December 30.
35.
National Association of County Engineers.2000. Action guide V: Stormwater management and drainage. Washington, DC: National Association of County Engineers.
36.
OlberdinJean Cencula. 2002. Does regionalism beget regionalism? The relationship between norms and regional partnerships for economic development. Public Administration Review62:480–91.
37.
ReeseLaura A.1991. The role of counties in local economic development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta.
38.
SingerIngridDavidsonLindsay J.TolbertJenniferFagnaniLynne2004. America's safety net hospitals and health systems, 2002: Results of the 2002 annual NAPH member survey. Washington, DC: National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems.
39.
StriebGregoryWaughWilliam L.Jr.1991. The changing responsibilities of county governments: Data from a national survey of county leaders. American Review of Public Administration21:139–55.
40.
SvaraJames H.1996. Leadership and professionalism in county government. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge, ed.MenzelDonald C., 109–27. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
41.
WeissertCarol S.GogginMalcolm L.. 2002. Non-incremental policy change: Lessons from Michigan's Medicaid managed care initiative. Public Administration Review62:206–16.
42.
WhiteDale. 2005. Sarasota County may require affordable housing. Sarasota Herald-Tribune, April 28, 5B.