BacotA. HunterDawesRoy A.. 1997. State expenditures and policy outcomes in environmental program management. Policy Studies Journal25:355–70.
2.
BouwesNicholaasHassurSteven M.ShapiroMark D.. 2001. Empowerment through risk-related information: EPA's Risk-Screening Environmental Indicators Project. Working paper series no. 18. Amherst: Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts.
De MarchiScottHamiltonJames T.. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of self-reported data: An evaluation of the toxics release inventory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty32:57–76.
5.
EriksonRobertWrightGeraldMcIverJohn1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
FiorinoDaniel J.2004. Flexibility. In Environmental governance reconsidered: Challenges, choices, and opportunities, ed.DurantRobert F.FiorinoDaniel J.O'LearyRosemary393–425. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
FiorinoDaniel J.The new environmental regulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8.
FungArchonO'RourkeDara. 2000. Reinventing environmental regulation from the grassroots up: Explaining and expanding the success of the Toxics Release Inventory. Environmental Management25:115–27.
9.
GerberBrian J.TeskePaul2000. Regulatory policymaking in the American states: A review of theories and evidence. Political Research Quarterly53:849–86.
10.
GrahamMary. 1999. The morning after Earth Day: Practical environmental politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11.
GrahamMary. 2002. Democracy by disclosure: The rise of technopopulism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12.
GrahamMaryMillerCatherine2001. Disclosure of toxic releases in the United States. Environment43, no. 8: 8–20.
13.
GrantDon. 1997. Allowing citizen participation in environmental regulation: An empirical analysis of the effects of Right-to-Sue and Right-to-Know provisions on industry's toxic emissions. Social Science Quarterly78:859–73.
14.
GrantDonJonesAndrewBergesenAlbert2002. Organizational size and pollution: The case of the U.S. chemical industry. American Sociological Review67:389–407.
15.
GrantDonJonesAndrewNell TrautnerMary. 2004. Do facilities with distant headquarters pollute more? How civic engagement conditions the environmental performance of absentee plants. Social Forces83:189–214.
16.
HallBobLee KerrMary. 1991. 1991–1992 Green index: A state by state guide to the nation's environmental health. Washington, DC: Island Press.
17.
HamiltonJames T.2005. Regulation through revelation: The origins, politics, and impacts of the Toxics Release Inventory program. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
JohnsonJanet ButtolphReynoldsH. T.. 2005. Political science research methods. 5th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
19.
KonarShameekCohenMark A.. 1997. Information as regulation: The effect of community Right-to-Know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management32:109–24.
20.
LesterJames P.1994. A new federalism? Environmental policy in the states. In Environmental policy in the 1990s. 2nd ed., ed.VigNorman J.KraftMichael E.51–68. Washington: CQ Press.
21.
LesterJames P.AllenDavid W.HillKelly M.. 2001. Environmental injustice in the United States: Myths and realities. Boulder: Westview Press.
22.
LesterJames P.FrankeJames L.BowmanAnn O'M.KramerKenneth W.. 1983. A comparative perspective on state hazardous waste regulation. In Politics of hazardous waste management, ed.LesterJames P.BowmanAnn O'M.212–31. Durham: Duke University Press.
23.
LowryWilliam. 1992. The dimensions of federalism: State governments and pollution control policies. Durham: Duke University Press.
24.
NatanThomas E.Jr.MillerCatherine G.. 1998. Are Toxic Release Inventory reductions real?Environmental Science and Technology32:368A–74A.
25.
PotoskiMatthewWoodsNeal D.. 2002. Dimensions of state environmental policies: Air pollution regulation in the United States. Policy Studies Journal30:208–26.
26.
PressDanielMazmanianDaniel A.. 2003. Understanding the transition to a sustainable economy. In Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century, ed.VigNorman J.KraftMichael E.275–98. Washington: CQ Press.
27.
RingquistEvan J.1993a. Environmental protection at the state level: Politics and progress in controlling pollution. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
28.
RingquistEvan J.1993b. Does regulation matter? Evaluating the effects of state air pollution control programs. Journal of Politics55:1022–45.
29.
RingquistEvan J.1994. Policy influence and policy responsiveness in state pollution control. Policy Studies Journal22:25–43.
30.
RingquistEvan J.1995. Is “effective regulation” always oxymoronic? The states and ambient air quality. Social Science Quarterly76:69–87.
31.
SantosSusan L.CovelloVincent T.McCallumDavid B.. 1996. Industry response to SARA Title III: Pollution prevention, risk reduction, and risk communication. Risk Analysis16:57–66.
32.
ShapiroMarc D.2005. Equity and information: Information regulation, environmental justice, and risks from toxic chemicals. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management24:373–98.
33.
SigmanHilary. 2003. Letting states do the dirty work: State responsibility for federal environmental regulation. Unpublished manuscript. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
34.
StephanMark. 2002. Environmental information disclosure programs: They work, but why?Social Science Quarterly83:190–205.
35.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1993. The statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
36.
U.S. Department of Commerce.1992. 1995. Annual survey of manufacturers. Washington, DC: Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
37.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.1993. 1991 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) public data release. Washington, DC: Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
38.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.1998. 1996 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) public data release. Washington, DC: Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
39.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.2002. 2000 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) public data release report. Washington, DC: Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
40.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.2007. 2005 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) public data release report. Washington, DC: Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
41.
WilliamsBruce A.MathenyAlbert R.. 1984. Testing theories of social regulation: Hazardous waste regulation in the American states. Journal of Politics46:428–59.
42.
World Bank.2000. Greening industry: New roles for communities, markets, and governments. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
YuChilikO'TooleLawrence J.Jr.CooleyJamesCowieGailCrowSusanHerbertStephanie. 1998. Policy instruments for reducing toxic releases: The effectiveness of state information and enforcement actions. Evaluation Review22:571–89.