AlexanderJane. 2000. Command performance. New York: Public Affairs.
2.
AltJames E.LowryRobert C.. 1994. Divided government, fiscal institutions, and budget deficits: Evidence from the states. American Political Science Review88:811–28.
3.
AltJames E.LowryRobert C.. 2000. A dynamic model of state budget outcomes under divided partisan government. Journal of Politics62:1035–69.
4.
BarsdateKelly. 2001. The state arts agency policy environment. Working paper. Cultural Policy Center, University of Chicago.
5.
BaumolWilliam J.1991. Public support for the arts: Why and wherefore?Washington, DC: President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities.
6.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science42:327–48.
7.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 2006. Most recently updated measures of citizen and government ideology. www.uky.edu/∼rford/Home-files/page0005.htm. Accessed July 10, 2007.
8.
BracePaulSims-ButlerKellieArceneauxKevinJohnsonMartin. 2002. Measuring public opinion in the American states: New perspectives using national survey data. American Journal of Political Science46:173–89.
9.
BrensonMichael. 2001. Visionaries and outcasts. New York: New Press.
10.
BrooksArthur C.2001. Who opposes government arts funding?Public Choice108:355–67.
11.
BrooksArthur C.2004. In search of true public arts support. Public Budgeting and Finance24:88–100.
12.
BursteinP.BauldryS.FroesesP.. 2001. Public opinion and congressional support for policy change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
13.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.. 1989. Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
CummingsMilton C.Jr.1991. Government and the arts: An overview. In Public money and the muse, ed.BenedictStephen. New York: Norton.
15.
DiMaggioPaul J.1991. Decentralization of arts funding from the federal government to the states. In Public money and the muse, ed.BenedictStephen. New York: Norton.
16.
DiMaggioPaul J.PettitBecky1999. Public opinion and political vulnerability: Why has the National Endowment for the Arts been such an attractive target? Working paper no. 7. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University.
17.
EricksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.. 1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and democracy in the American states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FilickoTherese. 1996. In what spirit do Americans cultivate the arts? A review of survey questions on the arts. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society26:221–46.
19.
FiorinaMorris P.1991. Divided government in the states. Political Science and Politics24:646–50.
20.
FloridaRichard. 2002. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
21.
FreyBruno. 2000. Arts and economics: Analysis and cultural policy. Berlin: Springer.
22.
GormleyWilliam T.1986. Regulatory issue networks in a federal system. Polity18:595–620.
23.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.MeierKenneth J.. 1996. The politics of gay and lesbian rights: Expanding the scope of the conflict. Journal of Politics58:332–49.
24.
HeilbrunJamesGrayCharles M.. 2001. The economics of art and culture. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HofferbertRichard I.UriceJohn K.. 1985. Small-scale policy: The federal stimulus versus competing explanations for state funding of the arts. American Journal of Political Science29:308–29.
26.
KinzerS.2004. Many state arts councils make their case and survive budget cuts. New York Times, January 8, E-1.
27.
LewisGregory B.2003. Contentious and consensus gay rights issues: Public opinion and state laws on discrimination and same-sex marriage. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC.
28.
LewisGregory B.2005. Same-sex marriage and the 2004 presidential election. PS: Political Science and Politics38:195–99.
29.
LewisGregory B.2006. Public spending on the arts as morality policy: The structure of public attitudes. Policy Studies Journal34:131–38.
30.
LewisGregory B.BrooksArthur C.. 2005. Aquestion of morality: Artists' values and public funding for the arts. Public Administration Review65:8–17.
31.
LowellJulia F.2004. State arts agencies 1965–2003: Whose interests to serve?Santa Monica: RAND.
32.
MoenMatthew C.1997. Congress and the National Endowment for the Arts: Institutional patterns and arts funding, 1965–1994. Social Science Journal34:185–200.
33.
MooneyChristopher Z.LeeMei-Hsien. 2000. The influence of values on consensus and contentious morality policy: U.S. death penalty reform, 1956–82. Journal of Politics62:223–39.
34.
MulcahyKevin V.2002. The state arts agency: An overview of cultural federalism in the United States. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society32:67–80.
35.
National Assembly of State Arts Agencies.2001. State arts agency public funding sourcebook: 1966–2001. Washington, DC: National Assembly of State Arts Agencies.
36.
National Assembly of State Arts Agencies.2006. Legislative appropriations annual survey: Fiscal year 2006. Washington, DC: National Assembly of State Arts Agencies.
37.
National Endowment for the Arts.2000. A brief chronology of federal support for the arts: 1965–2000. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
38.
NiceDavid C.1983. Representation in the states: Policymaking and ideology. Social Science Quarterly64:404–11.
39.
NorranderBarbara. 2000. The multi-layered impact of public opinion on capital punishment implementation in the American states. Political Research Quarterly53:771–93.
40.
NorranderBarbaraWilcoxClyde1999. Public opinion and policymaking in the states: The case of post-Roe abortion policy. Policy Studies Journal27:707–22.
41.
PerssonTorstenRolandGérardTabelliniGuido. 1997. Separation of powers and political accountability. Quarterly Journal of Economics112:1163–1202.
42.
PerssonTorstenRolandGérardTabelliniGuido. 2000. Comparative politics and public finance. Journal of Political Economy108:1121–61.
43.
PettitBeckyDiMaggioPaul1998. Public sentiments towards the arts: A critical reanalysis of 13 opinion surveys. Working paper no. 5. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University.
44.
PoterbaJames M.1994. State responses to fiscal crises: The effects of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of Political Economy102:799–821.
45.
RushtonMichael. 2002. Political oversight of arts councils: A comparison of Canada and the United States. International Journal of Cultural Policy8:153–65.
46.
RushtonMichael. 2003. Transaction cost politics and the National Endowment for the Arts. Poetics31:133–50.
47.
RushtonMichael. 2005. Support for earmarked public spending on culture: Evidence from a referendum in metropolitan Detroit. Public Budgeting and Finance25:72–85.
48.
SchusterJ. Mark. 2002. Sub-national cultural policy—Where the action is: Mapping state cultural policy in the United States. International Journal of Cultural Policy8:181–96.
49.
ThrosbyDavid. 1994. The production and consumption of the arts: A view from cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature32:1–29.
50.
ThrosbyDavid. 2001. Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
UriceJohn K.1992. The future of the state arts agency movement in the 1990s: Decline and effect. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society22:19–32.
52.
WrightGerald C.Jr.EricksonRobert S.McIverJohn P.. 1985. Measuring state partisanship and ideology with survey data. Journal of Politics47:469–89.
53.
WrightGerald C.Jr.EricksonRobert S.McIverJohn P.. 1987. Public opinion and policy liberalism in the American states. American Journal of Political Science33:980–1001.