BarberBernard. 1983. The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2.
BurbankStephen B.FriedmanBarry2002. Reconsidering judicial independence. In Judicial independence at the crossroads: An interdisciplinary approach, ed.BurbankStephen B.FriedmanBarry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
CaldeiraGregory A.GibsonJames L.. 1992. The etiology of public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science36:635–64.
4.
CaliendoStephen M.1996. Public support for the U.S. Supreme Court: 1973–1994. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
5.
Carl Vinson Institute of Government.2000. Citizen survey results: Final report for the Georgia Supreme Court Commission on Public Trust and Confidence. Athens: Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia.
6.
CitrinJackMusteChristopher1999. Trust in government. In Measures of political attitudes, ed.RobinsonJohnShaverPhillip R.WrightsmanLawrence S.. San Diego: Academic Press.
7.
De la GarzaR. O.DeSipioL.. 2001. A satisfied clientele seeking more diverse services: Latinos and the courts. Behavioral Sciences and the Law19:237–48.
8.
DoughertyGeorge W.Randy BeckJ.BradburyMark2003. Race and the Georgia court: Implications of the Georgia Public Trust and Confidence Survey for Batson v. Kentucky and Its Progeny. Georgia Law Review37–1021.
9.
DouglasJ.HartleyR. E.. 2003. The politics of court budgeting in the states: Is judicial independence threatened by the budgetary process?Public Administration Review63:441–54.
10.
FaganR. W.1981. Public support for the courts: An examination of alternative explanations. Journal of Criminal Justice9:403–18.
11.
FeeneyFloyd. 1993. Evaluating trial court performance. In Handbook of court administration and management, ed.HaysSteven W.Blease GrahamColeJr.New York: Marcel Dekker.
12.
FleischmannArnoldPierannunziCarol1997. Politics in Georgia. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
13.
GalanterMarc. 1998. An oil strike in hell: Contemporary legends about the civil justice system. Arizona Law Review40:717–52.
14.
GreeneWilliam H.2001. Econometric analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
15.
HalvorsenKathleen E.2003. Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administration Review63:535–43.
16.
HetheringtonMarc J.1998. The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review92:791–808.
17.
HowellSusan E.1998. Citizen evaluation of the Louisiana courts. Commissioned by the Louisiana State Supreme Court. New Orleans: Survey Research Center, University of New Orleans.
18.
HowellSusan E.FaganDeborah1988. Race and trust in government: Testing the political reality model. Public Opinion Quarterly52:343–50.
19.
Judicial Council of Georgia.2000. FY2000 Annual Report. Atlanta: Administrative Office of the Courts of Georgia.
20.
KritzerHerbert M.VoelkerJohn1998. Familiarity breeds respect: How Wisconsin citizens view their courts. Judicature82:58–64.
21.
LehneR.ReynoldsJ.. 1978. The impact of judicial activism on public opinion. American Journal of Political Science22:896–904.
22.
LeviMargaretStokerLaura2000. Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science3:475–507.
23.
LindE. A.TylerT. R.. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justiceNew York: Plenum Press.
24.
LindE. A.KulikC. T.AmbroseM.De Vera ParkM. V.. 1993. Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly38:224–51.
25.
MishlerWilliamSheehanReginald S.. 1993. The Supreme Court as countermajoritarian institution? The impact of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review87:87–101.
26.
MurphyWalter F.TanenhausJosephKastnerD.. 1973. Public evaluations of constitutional courts: Alternative explanations. Beverly Hills, CA Sage.
27.
MyersL. B.1996. Bringing the offender to heel: Views of the criminal courts. In Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey, ed.FlanaganJ. T.LongmireD. R.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
National Center for State Courts.1999. How the public views the state courts: A 1999 national survey. Paper presented at The National Conference on Public Trust and Confidence in the Justice System, Washington, DC.
29.
NicholsonStephen P.HowardRobert2003. Framing support for the Supreme Court in the aftermath of Bush v. Gore. Journal of Politics65:656–75.
30.
OlsonSusan M.HuthDavid A.. 1998. Explaining public attitudes toward local courts. Justice System Journal20:41–62.
31.
PerrettiTerri Jennings. 2002. Does judicial independence exist? The lessons of social science research. In Judicial independence at the crossroads: An interdisciplinary approach, ed.BurbankStephen B.FriedmanBarry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
PrillamanW. C.The judiciary and democratic decay in Latin America. 2000. Westport, CT: Praeger.
33.
RaymondP.1992. The impact of a televised trial on individuals' information and attitudes. Judicature75:204.
34.
SpigelmanJ. J.2001. Citizens, consumers and courts. Address before the International Conference on Regulation Reform Management and Scrutiny of Legislation, New South Wales Parliament House, Sydney, Australia, www.agd.nwsw.gov.
35.
StimsonJames A.MackuenM. B.EriksonRichard S.. 1995. Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review89:543–65.
36.
StuntzW. J.1999. Race, class, and drugs. Columbia Law Review98:1795–1842.
37.
SunshineJasonTylerTom R.. 2003. The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review37:555–89.
38.
TylerT. R.1988. What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review22:103–35.
39.
TylerT. R.1990. Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
40.
TylerT. R.1994. Governing amid diversity: The effect of fair decisionmaking procedures on the legitimacy of government. Law and Society Review29:809–31.
41.
TylerT. R.2001. Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions?Behavioral Sciences and the Law19:215–35.
42.
UlbigStacy G.2002. Policies, procedures, and the people: Sources of support for government?Social Science Quarterly83:789–809.
43.
ZemansFrances K.1991. In the eye of the beholder: The relationship between the public and the courts. Justice System Journal15:722.