Aryeetey-AttohSamuelMorrow-JonesHazel A.CostaFrank J.MonroeCharles B.SommersGail G.. 1998. Central-city distress in Ohio's elastic cities: Regional and local policy responses. Urban Geography19: 735–56.
2.
BassettEllen M.TaylorGary D.. 2004. Intergovernmental cooperation: Joint efforts generate options. Ann Arbor: Michigan Society of Planning.
3.
BlairJohn P.StaleySamuel R.ZhangZhongcai. 1996. The central city elasticity hypothesis: A critical appraisal of Rusk's Theory of Urban Development. Journal of the American Planning Association62: 345–53.
4.
CarrJered B.FeiockRichard C.. 2001. State annexation “constraints” and the frequency of municipal annexation. Political Research Quarterly54: 459–70.
5.
Citizens Research Council of Michigan. 1999. A bird's eye view of Michigan local government at the end of the twentieth century. Livonia: Citizens Research Council of Michigan.
6.
DownsAnthony. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
7.
EdwardsMary. 1999. Annexation: A “winner-take-all” process?State and Local Government Review31: 221–31.
NorrisDonald F.2001. Prospects for regional governance under the New Regionalism: Economic imperatives versus political impediments. Journal of Urban Affairs23: 557–71.
11.
NunnSamuelRosentraubMark S.. 1997. Dimensions of interjurisdictional cooperation. Journal of the American Planning Association63: 205–19.
12.
OrfieldMyron. 1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13.
PalmerJamie L.LindseyGreg. 2001. Classifying state approaches to annexation. State and Local Government Review33: 60–73.
14.
RuskDavid. 1993. Cities without suburbs. Princeton: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
15.
SavitchH. V.VogelRonald K.. 2000. Introduction: Paths to New Regionalism. State and Local Government Review32: 158–68.
16.
SavitchH. V.CollinsDavidSandersDanielMarkhamJohn P.. 1993. Ties that bind: Central cities, suburbs and the new metropolitan region. Economic Development Quarterly7: 341–57.
17.
TaylorGary D.2001. Selected constitutional and legislative provisions promoting local government cooperation. East Lansing: Michigan State University Cooperative Extension.
18.
TaylorGary D.HarveyLyn R.. 2004. The Conditional Land Transfer Act: Research, reflections and policy recommendations. Detroit: Southeast Michigan Council of Governments.
VogelRonaldNezelkewiczNorman. 2003. Metropolitan planning organizations and the New Regionalism: The case of Louisville. Publius32: 107–29.
21.
WeivelWimPerskyJosephSchafferKimberly. 2002. Less sprawl, greater equity? The potential for revenue sharing in the Chicago region. In Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences and policy responses, ed.SquiresGregory D.. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
