Assessing the Quality of Municipal Government Web Sites

Accenture. 2004. E-government leadership: High performance, maximum value. The Accenture Government Executive Series. www.accenture.com/xdoc/en/industries/government/gove_egov_value.pdf. Accessed May 31.

AGIMO. See Australian Government Information Management Office.

American Society for Quality. 2004. Definition of quality. www.asq.org/portal/page?_pageid=33,39211,33_39248&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL. Accessed July 23.

Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO). 2003. E-government benefits study. April. www.agimo.gov.au/_data/assets/file/16032/benefits.pdf. Accessed September 10, 2004.

Barker Joe . 2004. Evaluating Web pages: Techniques to apply & questions to ask. University California- Berkeley Teaching Library Internet Workshops. January 7. www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html. Accessed June 18.

Beck Susan . 1997. Evaluation criteria. The good, the bad & the ugly: Or, why it's a good idea to evaluate web sources. lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/evalcrit.html. Accessed June 17, 2004.

Beenan G. Ling Kimberly Wang Xiaoqing Chang Klarissa Frankowski Dan Resnick Paul Kraut Robert . 2004. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Presented at 2004 computer-supported collaborative work, Chicago. November.

Bimber Bruce . 2000. The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Communication 17: 329–33.

Black Jane . 2002. Usability is next to profitability. Business Week Online. December 4. www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2002/tc2002124_2181.htm. Accessed June 21, 2004.

Bonnet Monica . 2001. Personalization of Web services: Opportunities and challenges. Ariande, 28,. June. www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/personalization/. Accessed June 11, 2004.

BroadVision Inc . 2004. Using proven personalization techniques to drive profitable online behavior. Broadvision Information Week white paper. May 1. whitepapers.informationweek.com/detail/RES/1084902212_986.html. Accessed June 21.

Caldow Janet . 2004. E-democracy: Putting down global roots. IBM Institute for Electronic Government. www-1.ibm.com/industries/government/ieg/pdf/e-democracy%20putting%20down%20roots.pdf. Accessed April 23.

Cap Gemini Ernst & Young. 2004. Online availability of public services: How is Europe progressing? Report to the European Commission DG Information Society. europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2005/doc/highlights/whats_new/capgemini4.pdf. Accessed April 16.

Carmines Edward Zeller Richard . 1979. Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Cronbach L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, no. 3:297–334.

Dean Joshua . 2002. Study says federal websites need to be easier to use. Government Executive.com. March 8. www.peacecorps.gov/library/pdf/T0103_trainculturematters.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2004.

Paul Di Maggio Eszter Hargittai W. Neuman Russell Robinson John P. . 2001. The Internet's effect on society. Annual Review of Sociology. 27: 306–27.

E-Government Institute. 2003. Digital governance in municipalities worldwide: An assessment of municipal Web sites throughout the world. National Center for Public Productivity, Rutgers University and the Global e-Policy e-Government Institute. Sungkyunkwan University. www.andromeda.rutgers.edu/∼egovinst/Website/summary.htm. Accessed May 25, 2004.

Fogg B. J. 2002. How do people evaluate a website's credibility? Results from a large study. Report jointly published by the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, Consumer Web Watch, and Sliced Bread Design, LLC. November 11. www.consumerwebwatch.org/news/report3_credibilityresearch/stanfordPTL.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2004.

Fountain Jane . 2001. Building the virtual state: information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Freed Larry . 2005. The American customer satisfaction index: E-government satisfaction index. March 15. media.centerdigitalgov.com/GTEN/americanindex.pdf. Accessed March 17.

Friesen Leslie . 2004. Weighing value: Good intentions don't always stack up. Government Technology. June. www.govtech.net/magazine/story.php?id=90476. Accessed June 22.

Gamble-Risley Michelle . 2002. 2002 best of the Web: Best of breed programs. The Center for Digital Government. media.centerdigitalgov.com/Best_of_Breed/BOBBOW02.pdf. Accessed August 9, 2004.

Government Technology. 2004. An interview with David Eichenthal and Mark Kiel of the City of Chattanooga. Government Technology Online. August 5. www.govtech.net/magazine/channel_story.php?channel=7&id=91172. Accessed August 19.

Gronlund Ake . 2001. Managing electronic services: A public sector perspective. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Hale Matthew Musso Juliet Weare Christopher . 1999. Developing digital democracy: Evidence from California municipal Web pages. In Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age, edited by Hague Barry Loader Brian . New York: Routledge.

Hasson, Judi. E-gov services go unused. 2004. Federal Computer Week. June 2. www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2004/0531/web-egov-06-02-04.asp. Accessed June 22.

Ho A. T.-K. 2002. Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Adminstration Review 62, no. 4:434–44.

Ho A. T.-K. Ni A. . 2004. Explaining the adoption of e-government features: A case study of Iowa County treasurers' offices. American Review of Public Administration 34, no. 2:164–80.

Horrigan John . 2004. How Americans get in touch with government. A Pew Internet and the American Life Report. May 24. www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_E-Gov_Report_0504.pdf. Accessed May 25.

Kaylor Charles Deshazo Randy Van Eck David . 2001. Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly 18, no. 4:293–307.

Kim Amy Jo . 2000. Community building on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.

Kinder Tony . 2002. Vote early, vote often? Public Administration 80, no. 3:557–82.

Koyanl Sanjay Bailey Robert Hall Janice Allison Susan Mulligan Conrad Bailey Kent Tolson Mark ). 2003. Research-based Web design and usability guidelines. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. usability.gov/pdfs/guidelines_book.pdf. Accessed June 11, 2004.

Lake D. 2000. The Web: Growing by 2 million pages a day. CIO Asia. June. www.computerworld.com.sg/pcio.nsf/0/

Microsoft Inc . 2004. Microsoft and Section 508. Microsoft Accessibility Initiative. April 2. www.microsoft.com/enable/microsoft/section508.aspx. Accessed July 12.

Moon M. Jae . 2002. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review 62, no. 4:24ff.

Mossberger Karen Tolbert Caroline Stansbury Mary . 2003. Virtual inequality: beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Mullaney Tim . 2004. The Web 20: Bruised but still strong. Business Week. September 13:106–8.

Musso Juliet Weare C. Hale M. . 2001. Designing Web technology for local governance reform: Good management or good democracy? Political Communication 17: 1–19.

National Electronic Commerce Coordinating Council (NECCC). 2002. Electronic payments primer. Presented at the National Electronic Commerce Coordinating Council National Conference. New York: December. www.ec3.org/Downloads/2002/epayments_primer.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2004.

NECCC. See National Electronic Commerce Coordinating Council.

Nielsen Net Ratings. 2004. Three out of four Americans have access to the Internet. Media release. March 18. www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_040318.pdf. Accessed June 16.

OECD. See Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Office of the E-envoy. 2003. Guidelines for UK government websites: Framework for local government. Accessed June 16, 2004.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2003. The E-Government Imperative. OECD E-government Studies. www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/egov/E-GovernmentImperative.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2004.

Payne Chris . 2000. Everything you need to know about personalization. Web Developers Virtual Library. November 22. www.wdvl.com/Authoring/ASP/Personalization/. Accessed June 11, 2004.

Personalization Consortium. 2000. Personalization and privacy survey results. www.personalization.org/WebConsumerSurveyRelease.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2004.

Personalization Consortium. 2003. What is personalization? Frequently asked questions. www.personalization.org/faqs1.html#questionone. Accessed June 11, 2004.

Putnam Robert . 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Resnick Paul . 2004. Impersonal sociotechnical capital, ICTs and collective action among strangers. www.si.umich.edu/∼presnick/papers/xforment/chapter.pdf. Accessed April 20.

Scott James K. forthcoming. E the people: Do U.S. municipal government websites facilitate public involvement? Public Administration Review.

Stowers Genie . 1999. Becoming cyberactive: State and local governments on the World Wide Web. Government Information Quarterly 16, no. 2:111–27.

Surmacz Jon . 2003. The personalization myth. CIO Magazine. October 22. www2.cio.com/metrics/2003/metric621.html?CATEGORY=8&NAME=E-Business. Accessed June 21, 2004.

U.S. General Services Administration. 2003. STEP 508: Your tool for prioritizing Web site accessibility problems. December 16. www.section508.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=content&id=155. Accessed July 12, 2004.

West Darrell . 2002. Urban e-government: 2002. Center for Public Policy, Brown University. www.inside-politics.org/egovt02city.html. Accessed September 9, 2004.