EderingtonLouis. 1979. The hedging performance of the new futures markets. Journal of Finance34, no. 1:157–70.
2.
FerryJohn. 2004. U.S. local governments increase derivatives use. Risk Magazine (September): 12.
3.
GarrettThomasWagnerGary. 2004. State government finances: World War II to the current crises. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review86, no. 2:9–25.
4.
HullJohn. 2005. Fundamentals of futures and options markets. 5th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
5.
KnightBrianLevinsonArik. 1999. Rainy day funds and state government savings. National Tax Journal53, no. 3:459–72.
6.
KrizKenneth. 2003. Could governments hedge financial risk? Working paper. University of Nebraska at Omaha.
7.
LindahlMary. 1996. A hedging strategy for Alaska: Learning from the Texas experience. Journal of Energy Finance & Development1, no. 1:9–20.
8.
MattoonRichard. 2003. Creating a national state rainy day fund: A modest proposal to improve state fiscal performance. Working paper 2003–20. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
9.
OverdahlJames. 1987. The use of crude oil futures by the governments of oil-producing states. Journal of Futures Markets7, no. 6:603–17.
10.
ShillerRobert. 2003. The new financial order: Risk in the 21st century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1994. Financial derivatives: Actions needed to protect the financial system. GAO/GGD-94–133. Washington, DC: GAO.
12.
WagnerGary. 2003. Are state budget stabilization funds only the illusion of savings? Evidence from stationary panel data. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance43, no. 2:213–38.
13.
WagnerGary. 2004. The municipal bond market and fiscal institutions: Have budget stabilization funds reduced state borrowing costs?National Tax Journal57, no. 4:785–804.
